Cargando…

Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice

OBJECTIVES: In this prospective cohort study, we investigated whether patient-specific finite element (FE) models can identify patients at risk of a pathological femoral fracture resulting from metastatic bone disease, and compared these FE predictions with clinical assessments by experienced clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eggermont, F., Derikx, L. C., Verdonschot, N., van der Geest, I. C. M., de Jong, M. A. A., Snyers, A., van der Linden, Y. M., Tanck, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.76.BJR-2017-0325.R2
_version_ 1783338036143063040
author Eggermont, F.
Derikx, L. C.
Verdonschot, N.
van der Geest, I. C. M.
de Jong, M. A. A.
Snyers, A.
van der Linden, Y. M.
Tanck, E.
author_facet Eggermont, F.
Derikx, L. C.
Verdonschot, N.
van der Geest, I. C. M.
de Jong, M. A. A.
Snyers, A.
van der Linden, Y. M.
Tanck, E.
author_sort Eggermont, F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In this prospective cohort study, we investigated whether patient-specific finite element (FE) models can identify patients at risk of a pathological femoral fracture resulting from metastatic bone disease, and compared these FE predictions with clinical assessments by experienced clinicians. METHODS: A total of 39 patients with non-fractured femoral metastatic lesions who were irradiated for pain were included from three radiotherapy institutes. During follow-up, nine pathological fractures occurred in seven patients. Quantitative CT-based FE models were generated for all patients. Femoral failure load was calculated and compared between the fractured and non-fractured femurs. Due to inter-scanner differences, patients were analyzed separately for the three institutes. In addition, the FE-based predictions were compared with fracture risk assessments by experienced clinicians. RESULTS: In institute 1, median failure load was significantly lower for patients who sustained a fracture than for patients with no fractures. In institutes 2 and 3, the number of patients with a fracture was too low to make a clear distinction. Fracture locations were well predicted by the FE model when compared with post-fracture radiographs. The FE model was more accurate in identifying patients with a high fracture risk compared with experienced clinicians, with a sensitivity of 89% versus 0% to 33% for clinical assessments. Specificity was 79% for the FE models versus 84% to 95% for clinical assessments. CONCLUSION: FE models can be a valuable tool to improve clinical fracture risk predictions in metastatic bone disease. Future work in a larger patient population should confirm the higher predictive power of FE models compared with current clinical guidelines. Cite this article: F. Eggermont, L. C. Derikx, N. Verdonschot, I. C. M. van der Geest, M. A. A. de Jong, A. Snyers, Y. M. van der Linden, E. Tanck. Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians? Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:430–439. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.76.BJR-2017-0325.R2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6035356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60353562018-07-20 Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice Eggermont, F. Derikx, L. C. Verdonschot, N. van der Geest, I. C. M. de Jong, M. A. A. Snyers, A. van der Linden, Y. M. Tanck, E. Bone Joint Res Biomaterials OBJECTIVES: In this prospective cohort study, we investigated whether patient-specific finite element (FE) models can identify patients at risk of a pathological femoral fracture resulting from metastatic bone disease, and compared these FE predictions with clinical assessments by experienced clinicians. METHODS: A total of 39 patients with non-fractured femoral metastatic lesions who were irradiated for pain were included from three radiotherapy institutes. During follow-up, nine pathological fractures occurred in seven patients. Quantitative CT-based FE models were generated for all patients. Femoral failure load was calculated and compared between the fractured and non-fractured femurs. Due to inter-scanner differences, patients were analyzed separately for the three institutes. In addition, the FE-based predictions were compared with fracture risk assessments by experienced clinicians. RESULTS: In institute 1, median failure load was significantly lower for patients who sustained a fracture than for patients with no fractures. In institutes 2 and 3, the number of patients with a fracture was too low to make a clear distinction. Fracture locations were well predicted by the FE model when compared with post-fracture radiographs. The FE model was more accurate in identifying patients with a high fracture risk compared with experienced clinicians, with a sensitivity of 89% versus 0% to 33% for clinical assessments. Specificity was 79% for the FE models versus 84% to 95% for clinical assessments. CONCLUSION: FE models can be a valuable tool to improve clinical fracture risk predictions in metastatic bone disease. Future work in a larger patient population should confirm the higher predictive power of FE models compared with current clinical guidelines. Cite this article: F. Eggermont, L. C. Derikx, N. Verdonschot, I. C. M. van der Geest, M. A. A. de Jong, A. Snyers, Y. M. van der Linden, E. Tanck. Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians? Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:430–439. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.76.BJR-2017-0325.R2. 2018-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6035356/ /pubmed/30034797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.76.BJR-2017-0325.R2 Text en © 2018 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biomaterials
Eggermont, F.
Derikx, L. C.
Verdonschot, N.
van der Geest, I. C. M.
de Jong, M. A. A.
Snyers, A.
van der Linden, Y. M.
Tanck, E.
Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice
title Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice
title_full Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice
title_fullStr Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice
title_short Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice
title_sort can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice
topic Biomaterials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.76.BJR-2017-0325.R2
work_keys_str_mv AT eggermontf canpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsbetterpredictfracturesinmetastaticbonediseasethanexperiencedclinicianstowardscomputationalmodellingindailyclinicalpractice
AT derikxlc canpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsbetterpredictfracturesinmetastaticbonediseasethanexperiencedclinicianstowardscomputationalmodellingindailyclinicalpractice
AT verdonschotn canpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsbetterpredictfracturesinmetastaticbonediseasethanexperiencedclinicianstowardscomputationalmodellingindailyclinicalpractice
AT vandergeesticm canpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsbetterpredictfracturesinmetastaticbonediseasethanexperiencedclinicianstowardscomputationalmodellingindailyclinicalpractice
AT dejongmaa canpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsbetterpredictfracturesinmetastaticbonediseasethanexperiencedclinicianstowardscomputationalmodellingindailyclinicalpractice
AT snyersa canpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsbetterpredictfracturesinmetastaticbonediseasethanexperiencedclinicianstowardscomputationalmodellingindailyclinicalpractice
AT vanderlindenym canpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsbetterpredictfracturesinmetastaticbonediseasethanexperiencedclinicianstowardscomputationalmodellingindailyclinicalpractice
AT tancke canpatientspecificfiniteelementmodelsbetterpredictfracturesinmetastaticbonediseasethanexperiencedclinicianstowardscomputationalmodellingindailyclinicalpractice