Cargando…

Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays. Most patients’ disease develops via the adenoma–carcinoma sequence; colonoscopy with polypectomy effectively reduces both mortality and incidence by removing precancerous adenomas. Previous studies showed that pol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yen-Nien, Chang, Li-Chun, Chang, Chi-Yang, Chen, Peng-Jen, Chen, Chi-Yi, Tseng, Cheng-Hao, Chiu, Han-Mo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z
_version_ 1783338043677081600
author Chen, Yen-Nien
Chang, Li-Chun
Chang, Chi-Yang
Chen, Peng-Jen
Chen, Chi-Yi
Tseng, Cheng-Hao
Chiu, Han-Mo
author_facet Chen, Yen-Nien
Chang, Li-Chun
Chang, Chi-Yang
Chen, Peng-Jen
Chen, Chi-Yi
Tseng, Cheng-Hao
Chiu, Han-Mo
author_sort Chen, Yen-Nien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays. Most patients’ disease develops via the adenoma–carcinoma sequence; colonoscopy with polypectomy effectively reduces both mortality and incidence by removing precancerous adenomas. Previous studies showed that polypectomy without electrocautery (cold snaring polypectomy) is a safe and time-saving procedure to manage polyps < 10 mm. However, randomized controlled trials have failed to prove the superiority of cold snaring polypectomy for reducing the risk of delayed bleeding in comparison with hot snaring polypectomy, generally because of their low statistical power that was limited by sample sizes. In this study, we aim to compare the risk of delayed bleeding following cold and hot snaring polypectomy based on a large sample size. METHODS: This is a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to compare cold and hot snaring polypectomy for the treatment of small colorectal polyps. A total of 4258 patients with small polyps (4–10 mm) will be randomized 1:1 to each group. Colonoscopy and polypectomy will be performed by 17 experienced endoscopists at six study sites. The randomization will be performed via an online website. Pathological examination using image-enhanced endoscopy with either narrow-band imaging or chromoendoscopy will be conducted to confirm optically and histologically that complete resections have been achieved, respectively. The primary outcome measurement is the risk of delayed bleeding. The secondary outcome measurements include the number of hemoclip applications, complete eradication confirmed optically and histologically, tissue retrieval rate, procedure time, emergency unit visits, and any adverse events such as immediate bleeding or perforation. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that cold snaring polypectomy can reduce the risk of delayed bleeding by avoiding thermal injury. In addition, this study will also compare cold and hot snaring polypectomy in terms of the complete eradication rate and procedure time. Based on data collected, we will demonstrate that cold snaring polypectomy is a safe, effective, and economic procedure for small colorectal polyps. The results will also provide additional data on which to develop recommendations for treating small colorectal polyps. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03373136. Registered on 29 November 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6035397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60353972018-07-09 Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Chen, Yen-Nien Chang, Li-Chun Chang, Chi-Yang Chen, Peng-Jen Chen, Chi-Yi Tseng, Cheng-Hao Chiu, Han-Mo Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays. Most patients’ disease develops via the adenoma–carcinoma sequence; colonoscopy with polypectomy effectively reduces both mortality and incidence by removing precancerous adenomas. Previous studies showed that polypectomy without electrocautery (cold snaring polypectomy) is a safe and time-saving procedure to manage polyps < 10 mm. However, randomized controlled trials have failed to prove the superiority of cold snaring polypectomy for reducing the risk of delayed bleeding in comparison with hot snaring polypectomy, generally because of their low statistical power that was limited by sample sizes. In this study, we aim to compare the risk of delayed bleeding following cold and hot snaring polypectomy based on a large sample size. METHODS: This is a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to compare cold and hot snaring polypectomy for the treatment of small colorectal polyps. A total of 4258 patients with small polyps (4–10 mm) will be randomized 1:1 to each group. Colonoscopy and polypectomy will be performed by 17 experienced endoscopists at six study sites. The randomization will be performed via an online website. Pathological examination using image-enhanced endoscopy with either narrow-band imaging or chromoendoscopy will be conducted to confirm optically and histologically that complete resections have been achieved, respectively. The primary outcome measurement is the risk of delayed bleeding. The secondary outcome measurements include the number of hemoclip applications, complete eradication confirmed optically and histologically, tissue retrieval rate, procedure time, emergency unit visits, and any adverse events such as immediate bleeding or perforation. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that cold snaring polypectomy can reduce the risk of delayed bleeding by avoiding thermal injury. In addition, this study will also compare cold and hot snaring polypectomy in terms of the complete eradication rate and procedure time. Based on data collected, we will demonstrate that cold snaring polypectomy is a safe, effective, and economic procedure for small colorectal polyps. The results will also provide additional data on which to develop recommendations for treating small colorectal polyps. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03373136. Registered on 29 November 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6035397/ /pubmed/29980220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Chen, Yen-Nien
Chang, Li-Chun
Chang, Chi-Yang
Chen, Peng-Jen
Chen, Chi-Yi
Tseng, Cheng-Hao
Chiu, Han-Mo
Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyennien comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT changlichun comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT changchiyang comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenpengjen comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenchiyi comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tsengchenghao comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chiuhanmo comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial