Cargando…
Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays. Most patients’ disease develops via the adenoma–carcinoma sequence; colonoscopy with polypectomy effectively reduces both mortality and incidence by removing precancerous adenomas. Previous studies showed that pol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z |
_version_ | 1783338043677081600 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yen-Nien Chang, Li-Chun Chang, Chi-Yang Chen, Peng-Jen Chen, Chi-Yi Tseng, Cheng-Hao Chiu, Han-Mo |
author_facet | Chen, Yen-Nien Chang, Li-Chun Chang, Chi-Yang Chen, Peng-Jen Chen, Chi-Yi Tseng, Cheng-Hao Chiu, Han-Mo |
author_sort | Chen, Yen-Nien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays. Most patients’ disease develops via the adenoma–carcinoma sequence; colonoscopy with polypectomy effectively reduces both mortality and incidence by removing precancerous adenomas. Previous studies showed that polypectomy without electrocautery (cold snaring polypectomy) is a safe and time-saving procedure to manage polyps < 10 mm. However, randomized controlled trials have failed to prove the superiority of cold snaring polypectomy for reducing the risk of delayed bleeding in comparison with hot snaring polypectomy, generally because of their low statistical power that was limited by sample sizes. In this study, we aim to compare the risk of delayed bleeding following cold and hot snaring polypectomy based on a large sample size. METHODS: This is a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to compare cold and hot snaring polypectomy for the treatment of small colorectal polyps. A total of 4258 patients with small polyps (4–10 mm) will be randomized 1:1 to each group. Colonoscopy and polypectomy will be performed by 17 experienced endoscopists at six study sites. The randomization will be performed via an online website. Pathological examination using image-enhanced endoscopy with either narrow-band imaging or chromoendoscopy will be conducted to confirm optically and histologically that complete resections have been achieved, respectively. The primary outcome measurement is the risk of delayed bleeding. The secondary outcome measurements include the number of hemoclip applications, complete eradication confirmed optically and histologically, tissue retrieval rate, procedure time, emergency unit visits, and any adverse events such as immediate bleeding or perforation. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that cold snaring polypectomy can reduce the risk of delayed bleeding by avoiding thermal injury. In addition, this study will also compare cold and hot snaring polypectomy in terms of the complete eradication rate and procedure time. Based on data collected, we will demonstrate that cold snaring polypectomy is a safe, effective, and economic procedure for small colorectal polyps. The results will also provide additional data on which to develop recommendations for treating small colorectal polyps. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03373136. Registered on 29 November 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6035397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60353972018-07-09 Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Chen, Yen-Nien Chang, Li-Chun Chang, Chi-Yang Chen, Peng-Jen Chen, Chi-Yi Tseng, Cheng-Hao Chiu, Han-Mo Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains a considerable challenge in healthcare nowadays. Most patients’ disease develops via the adenoma–carcinoma sequence; colonoscopy with polypectomy effectively reduces both mortality and incidence by removing precancerous adenomas. Previous studies showed that polypectomy without electrocautery (cold snaring polypectomy) is a safe and time-saving procedure to manage polyps < 10 mm. However, randomized controlled trials have failed to prove the superiority of cold snaring polypectomy for reducing the risk of delayed bleeding in comparison with hot snaring polypectomy, generally because of their low statistical power that was limited by sample sizes. In this study, we aim to compare the risk of delayed bleeding following cold and hot snaring polypectomy based on a large sample size. METHODS: This is a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to compare cold and hot snaring polypectomy for the treatment of small colorectal polyps. A total of 4258 patients with small polyps (4–10 mm) will be randomized 1:1 to each group. Colonoscopy and polypectomy will be performed by 17 experienced endoscopists at six study sites. The randomization will be performed via an online website. Pathological examination using image-enhanced endoscopy with either narrow-band imaging or chromoendoscopy will be conducted to confirm optically and histologically that complete resections have been achieved, respectively. The primary outcome measurement is the risk of delayed bleeding. The secondary outcome measurements include the number of hemoclip applications, complete eradication confirmed optically and histologically, tissue retrieval rate, procedure time, emergency unit visits, and any adverse events such as immediate bleeding or perforation. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that cold snaring polypectomy can reduce the risk of delayed bleeding by avoiding thermal injury. In addition, this study will also compare cold and hot snaring polypectomy in terms of the complete eradication rate and procedure time. Based on data collected, we will demonstrate that cold snaring polypectomy is a safe, effective, and economic procedure for small colorectal polyps. The results will also provide additional data on which to develop recommendations for treating small colorectal polyps. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03373136. Registered on 29 November 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6035397/ /pubmed/29980220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Chen, Yen-Nien Chang, Li-Chun Chang, Chi-Yang Chen, Peng-Jen Chen, Chi-Yi Tseng, Cheng-Hao Chiu, Han-Mo Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyennien comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT changlichun comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT changchiyang comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenpengjen comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenchiyi comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tsengchenghao comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chiuhanmo comparisonofcoldandhotsnaringpolypectomyforsmallcolorectalpolypsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |