Cargando…

Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The physical, occupational, social and psychological impact of chronic leg ulcers (CLUs) on an individual is considerable. Wound-related pain (WRP), the most common symptom, is frequently reported as moderate to severe and mostly occurs at dressing change. WRP pain may not be alleviated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purcell, Anne, Buckley, Thomas, King, Jennie, Moyle, Wendy, Marshall, Andrea P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0312-6
_version_ 1783338050001043456
author Purcell, Anne
Buckley, Thomas
King, Jennie
Moyle, Wendy
Marshall, Andrea P.
author_facet Purcell, Anne
Buckley, Thomas
King, Jennie
Moyle, Wendy
Marshall, Andrea P.
author_sort Purcell, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The physical, occupational, social and psychological impact of chronic leg ulcers (CLUs) on an individual is considerable. Wound-related pain (WRP), the most common symptom, is frequently reported as moderate to severe and mostly occurs at dressing change. WRP pain may not be alleviated by oral analgesics alone. Persistent poorly controlled leg ulcer pain can negatively impact wound healing and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: A pilot, parallel group, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted in six procedure clinics located in a public community nursing service in New South Wales, Australia to evaluate eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) on painful CLUs when used as a primary dressing. The primary objective was to assess feasibility by using pre-determined criteria: at least 80% recruitment rate, 80% retention rate and 80% adherence to the study protocol. Key eligibility criteria were that participants had a painful CLU no larger than 100 cm(2), a numerical rating scale (NRS) wound-related pain intensity score equal to or greater than 4, low to moderate exudate, no contraindications to EMLA® and capacity to consent. One hundred and seven patients with painful CLUs were screened for eligibility; 56% (n = 60) were eligible and consented to participate in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 30) or control (n = 30) groups. The intervention group received a measured dose of the topical anaesthetic EMLA® 5% cream daily as a primary dressing for 4 weeks followed by usual wound management for a further 8 weeks. The control group received usual wound management. Participants and investigators were not blinded to the treatment. WRP was measured at every dressing change. Wound healing and HRQoL were measured at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Recruitment rate was lower than expected which likely meant patients were missed. Study retention rate was 90% (n = 54). Intervention fidelity was impacted by availability of resources and patient factors such as increased WRP. CONCLUSION: This study identified that a larger randomised controlled trial investigating EMLA® applied as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers is feasible with modifications to the study protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: Registered 16 December, 2009
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6035424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60354242018-07-12 Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial Purcell, Anne Buckley, Thomas King, Jennie Moyle, Wendy Marshall, Andrea P. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: The physical, occupational, social and psychological impact of chronic leg ulcers (CLUs) on an individual is considerable. Wound-related pain (WRP), the most common symptom, is frequently reported as moderate to severe and mostly occurs at dressing change. WRP pain may not be alleviated by oral analgesics alone. Persistent poorly controlled leg ulcer pain can negatively impact wound healing and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: A pilot, parallel group, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted in six procedure clinics located in a public community nursing service in New South Wales, Australia to evaluate eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) on painful CLUs when used as a primary dressing. The primary objective was to assess feasibility by using pre-determined criteria: at least 80% recruitment rate, 80% retention rate and 80% adherence to the study protocol. Key eligibility criteria were that participants had a painful CLU no larger than 100 cm(2), a numerical rating scale (NRS) wound-related pain intensity score equal to or greater than 4, low to moderate exudate, no contraindications to EMLA® and capacity to consent. One hundred and seven patients with painful CLUs were screened for eligibility; 56% (n = 60) were eligible and consented to participate in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 30) or control (n = 30) groups. The intervention group received a measured dose of the topical anaesthetic EMLA® 5% cream daily as a primary dressing for 4 weeks followed by usual wound management for a further 8 weeks. The control group received usual wound management. Participants and investigators were not blinded to the treatment. WRP was measured at every dressing change. Wound healing and HRQoL were measured at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Recruitment rate was lower than expected which likely meant patients were missed. Study retention rate was 90% (n = 54). Intervention fidelity was impacted by availability of resources and patient factors such as increased WRP. CONCLUSION: This study identified that a larger randomised controlled trial investigating EMLA® applied as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers is feasible with modifications to the study protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: Registered 16 December, 2009 BioMed Central 2018-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6035424/ /pubmed/30002870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0312-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Purcell, Anne
Buckley, Thomas
King, Jennie
Moyle, Wendy
Marshall, Andrea P.
Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_short Eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial
title_sort eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (emla®) as a primary dressing on painful chronic leg ulcers: a pilot randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0312-6
work_keys_str_mv AT purcellanne eutecticmixtureoflocalanaestheticsemlaasaprimarydressingonpainfulchroniclegulcersapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT buckleythomas eutecticmixtureoflocalanaestheticsemlaasaprimarydressingonpainfulchroniclegulcersapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kingjennie eutecticmixtureoflocalanaestheticsemlaasaprimarydressingonpainfulchroniclegulcersapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moylewendy eutecticmixtureoflocalanaestheticsemlaasaprimarydressingonpainfulchroniclegulcersapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marshallandreap eutecticmixtureoflocalanaestheticsemlaasaprimarydressingonpainfulchroniclegulcersapilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial