Cargando…

A Comparative Study of the Amount of Bleeding and Hemodynamic Changes between Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Remifentanil Infusion for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia in Lumbar Discopathy Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the volume of blood loss and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing lumbar discopathy, after continuous infusions of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil during anesthesia with controlled low blood pressure. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Javaherforooshzadeh, Fatemeh, Monajemzadeh, Seyed Alireza, Soltanzadeh, Mansoor, Janatmakan, Farahzad, Salari, Amir, Saeed, Hesam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30009153
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.66959
_version_ 1783338066387140608
author Javaherforooshzadeh, Fatemeh
Monajemzadeh, Seyed Alireza
Soltanzadeh, Mansoor
Janatmakan, Farahzad
Salari, Amir
Saeed, Hesam
author_facet Javaherforooshzadeh, Fatemeh
Monajemzadeh, Seyed Alireza
Soltanzadeh, Mansoor
Janatmakan, Farahzad
Salari, Amir
Saeed, Hesam
author_sort Javaherforooshzadeh, Fatemeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the volume of blood loss and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing lumbar discopathy, after continuous infusions of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil during anesthesia with controlled low blood pressure. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 60 patients aged 20 to 65 years were randomly assigned to control and intervention groups. The intervention group received a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine at 0.3 - 0.7 µg/kg/hour plus propofol at 50 - 100 µg/kg/minute. The control group was given a continuous infusion of remifentanil at 0.1 to 1 µg/kg/minute plus the same dose of propofol as above. The primary outcome was the amount of patient's bleeding during surgery, and secondary outcomes were changes in the patient's systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and urinary output. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses of the main outcome in the control and intervention groups showed that there was no significant difference between the two drugs with regards to the volume of blood loss, mean arterial pressure, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Postoperative side effects were significantly lower in the intervention group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of dexmedetomidine plus propofol in comparison with remifentanil plus propofol did not show any significant difference regarding blood loss and hemodynamic changes; however, it reduced some side effects after surgery and decreased analgesic requirement in the postoperative period. Taken together, the findings of this study do not support strong recommendations for dexmedetomidine infusion for all patients and the decision should be taken with caution on basis of the anesthesiologist’s expert opinion and the patient’s condition during surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6035495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60354952018-07-13 A Comparative Study of the Amount of Bleeding and Hemodynamic Changes between Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Remifentanil Infusion for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia in Lumbar Discopathy Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial Javaherforooshzadeh, Fatemeh Monajemzadeh, Seyed Alireza Soltanzadeh, Mansoor Janatmakan, Farahzad Salari, Amir Saeed, Hesam Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the volume of blood loss and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing lumbar discopathy, after continuous infusions of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil during anesthesia with controlled low blood pressure. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 60 patients aged 20 to 65 years were randomly assigned to control and intervention groups. The intervention group received a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine at 0.3 - 0.7 µg/kg/hour plus propofol at 50 - 100 µg/kg/minute. The control group was given a continuous infusion of remifentanil at 0.1 to 1 µg/kg/minute plus the same dose of propofol as above. The primary outcome was the amount of patient's bleeding during surgery, and secondary outcomes were changes in the patient's systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and urinary output. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses of the main outcome in the control and intervention groups showed that there was no significant difference between the two drugs with regards to the volume of blood loss, mean arterial pressure, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Postoperative side effects were significantly lower in the intervention group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of dexmedetomidine plus propofol in comparison with remifentanil plus propofol did not show any significant difference regarding blood loss and hemodynamic changes; however, it reduced some side effects after surgery and decreased analgesic requirement in the postoperative period. Taken together, the findings of this study do not support strong recommendations for dexmedetomidine infusion for all patients and the decision should be taken with caution on basis of the anesthesiologist’s expert opinion and the patient’s condition during surgery. Kowsar 2018-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6035495/ /pubmed/30009153 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.66959 Text en Copyright © 2018, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Research Article
Javaherforooshzadeh, Fatemeh
Monajemzadeh, Seyed Alireza
Soltanzadeh, Mansoor
Janatmakan, Farahzad
Salari, Amir
Saeed, Hesam
A Comparative Study of the Amount of Bleeding and Hemodynamic Changes between Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Remifentanil Infusion for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia in Lumbar Discopathy Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial
title A Comparative Study of the Amount of Bleeding and Hemodynamic Changes between Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Remifentanil Infusion for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia in Lumbar Discopathy Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial
title_full A Comparative Study of the Amount of Bleeding and Hemodynamic Changes between Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Remifentanil Infusion for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia in Lumbar Discopathy Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of the Amount of Bleeding and Hemodynamic Changes between Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Remifentanil Infusion for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia in Lumbar Discopathy Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of the Amount of Bleeding and Hemodynamic Changes between Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Remifentanil Infusion for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia in Lumbar Discopathy Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial
title_short A Comparative Study of the Amount of Bleeding and Hemodynamic Changes between Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Remifentanil Infusion for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia in Lumbar Discopathy Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial
title_sort comparative study of the amount of bleeding and hemodynamic changes between dexmedetomidine infusion and remifentanil infusion for controlled hypotensive anesthesia in lumbar discopathy surgery: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30009153
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.66959
work_keys_str_mv AT javaherforooshzadehfatemeh acomparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT monajemzadehseyedalireza acomparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT soltanzadehmansoor acomparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT janatmakanfarahzad acomparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT salariamir acomparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT saeedhesam acomparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT javaherforooshzadehfatemeh comparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT monajemzadehseyedalireza comparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT soltanzadehmansoor comparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT janatmakanfarahzad comparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT salariamir comparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT saeedhesam comparativestudyoftheamountofbleedingandhemodynamicchangesbetweendexmedetomidineinfusionandremifentanilinfusionforcontrolledhypotensiveanesthesiainlumbardiscopathysurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial