Cargando…
Does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? A three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa
INTRODUCTION: Gentle assisted pushing (GAP) is an innovative method of applying gentle, steady pressure to a woman’s uterine fundus during second stage of labour. This randomised trial evaluated GAP in an upright position, compared with upright position alone or routine practice (recumbent posture)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29989055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000906 |
_version_ | 1783338069178449920 |
---|---|
author | Hofmeyr, G Justus Vogel, Joshua P Singata, Mandisa Habib, Ndema Abu Landoulsi, Sihem Gülmezoglu, A Metin |
author_facet | Hofmeyr, G Justus Vogel, Joshua P Singata, Mandisa Habib, Ndema Abu Landoulsi, Sihem Gülmezoglu, A Metin |
author_sort | Hofmeyr, G Justus |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Gentle assisted pushing (GAP) is an innovative method of applying gentle, steady pressure to a woman’s uterine fundus during second stage of labour. This randomised trial evaluated GAP in an upright position, compared with upright position alone or routine practice (recumbent posture). METHODS: An open-label, hospital-based, randomised trial was conducted in Eastern Cape, South Africa. Randomisation occurred following at least 15 min in second stage of labour. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using computer-generated block randomisation of variable size using opaque, sealed, numbered envelopes. Primary analysis was intention to treat. Participants were healthy, nulliparous, consenting women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation where vaginal birth was anticipated. The primary outcome was mean time from randomisation to birth. RESULTS: 1158 participants were randomly allocated to GAP (n=388), upright position (n=386) and routine practice (n=384), with no loss to follow-up. Baseline characteristics were largely similar. In the experimental arm, GAP was applied a median of two times (IQR 1.0–3.0). Women in upright position alone spent a median of 6 min (IQR 3.0–10.0) upright. Mean duration from randomisation to birth was not different across groups (mean (SD) duration: 24.1 (34.9) min in GAP group, 24.6 (30.5) min in upright group, 25.0 (39.3) min in routine practice group). There were no differences in secondary outcomes, except that at two sites maternal discomfort was greater for both GAP and upright position compared with routine practice; at the other sites there were no differences. CONCLUSION: No benefit was identified from GAP in the second stage; some women found the position uncomfortable. The use of fundal pressure should be limited to further research to determine techniques or settings in which it can safely assist vaginal birth. Women should be encouraged to assume the position they find most comfortable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PACTR201502001034448. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6035507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60355072018-07-09 Does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? A three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa Hofmeyr, G Justus Vogel, Joshua P Singata, Mandisa Habib, Ndema Abu Landoulsi, Sihem Gülmezoglu, A Metin BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: Gentle assisted pushing (GAP) is an innovative method of applying gentle, steady pressure to a woman’s uterine fundus during second stage of labour. This randomised trial evaluated GAP in an upright position, compared with upright position alone or routine practice (recumbent posture). METHODS: An open-label, hospital-based, randomised trial was conducted in Eastern Cape, South Africa. Randomisation occurred following at least 15 min in second stage of labour. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using computer-generated block randomisation of variable size using opaque, sealed, numbered envelopes. Primary analysis was intention to treat. Participants were healthy, nulliparous, consenting women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation where vaginal birth was anticipated. The primary outcome was mean time from randomisation to birth. RESULTS: 1158 participants were randomly allocated to GAP (n=388), upright position (n=386) and routine practice (n=384), with no loss to follow-up. Baseline characteristics were largely similar. In the experimental arm, GAP was applied a median of two times (IQR 1.0–3.0). Women in upright position alone spent a median of 6 min (IQR 3.0–10.0) upright. Mean duration from randomisation to birth was not different across groups (mean (SD) duration: 24.1 (34.9) min in GAP group, 24.6 (30.5) min in upright group, 25.0 (39.3) min in routine practice group). There were no differences in secondary outcomes, except that at two sites maternal discomfort was greater for both GAP and upright position compared with routine practice; at the other sites there were no differences. CONCLUSION: No benefit was identified from GAP in the second stage; some women found the position uncomfortable. The use of fundal pressure should be limited to further research to determine techniques or settings in which it can safely assist vaginal birth. Women should be encouraged to assume the position they find most comfortable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PACTR201502001034448. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6035507/ /pubmed/29989055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000906 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Hofmeyr, G Justus Vogel, Joshua P Singata, Mandisa Habib, Ndema Abu Landoulsi, Sihem Gülmezoglu, A Metin Does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? A three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa |
title | Does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? A three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa |
title_full | Does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? A three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa |
title_fullStr | Does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? A three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? A three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa |
title_short | Does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? A three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in South Africa |
title_sort | does gentle assisted pushing or giving birth in the upright position reduce the duration of the second stage of labour? a three-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial in south africa |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29989055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hofmeyrgjustus doesgentleassistedpushingorgivingbirthintheuprightpositionreducethedurationofthesecondstageoflabourathreearmopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialinsouthafrica AT vogeljoshuap doesgentleassistedpushingorgivingbirthintheuprightpositionreducethedurationofthesecondstageoflabourathreearmopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialinsouthafrica AT singatamandisa doesgentleassistedpushingorgivingbirthintheuprightpositionreducethedurationofthesecondstageoflabourathreearmopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialinsouthafrica AT habibndemaabu doesgentleassistedpushingorgivingbirthintheuprightpositionreducethedurationofthesecondstageoflabourathreearmopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialinsouthafrica AT landoulsisihem doesgentleassistedpushingorgivingbirthintheuprightpositionreducethedurationofthesecondstageoflabourathreearmopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialinsouthafrica AT gulmezogluametin doesgentleassistedpushingorgivingbirthintheuprightpositionreducethedurationofthesecondstageoflabourathreearmopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrialinsouthafrica |