Cargando…

A comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy of topical anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for vitreous floaters. METHODS: 30 patients with vitreous floaters were randomized into Group T (topical anesthesia, proparacaine eye drop) and Group R (retrobul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Rong Han, Zhang, Rui, Lin, Zhong, Liang, Qi Hua, Moonasar, Nived
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29981573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0838-7
_version_ 1783338076720857088
author Wu, Rong Han
Zhang, Rui
Lin, Zhong
Liang, Qi Hua
Moonasar, Nived
author_facet Wu, Rong Han
Zhang, Rui
Lin, Zhong
Liang, Qi Hua
Moonasar, Nived
author_sort Wu, Rong Han
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy of topical anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for vitreous floaters. METHODS: 30 patients with vitreous floaters were randomized into Group T (topical anesthesia, proparacaine eye drop) and Group R (retrobulbar anesthesia), and underwent 27-gauge PPV. A 5-point visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) was used to assess patients’ pain experience of anesthesia and surgery procedure (during surgery, 2 h and 1 day after surgery). RESULTS: The VAPS of anesthesia procedure was 1.27 ± 0.59 for patients in Group R, while it was all 0 for patients in Group T (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference for VAPS during surgery (Group T: 1.13 ± 0.74, Group R: 0.67 ± 0.62, p = 0.67), 2 h (Group T: 0.80 ± 1.01, Group R: 0.67 ± 0.62, p = 0.67) and 1 day (Group T: 0.20 ± 0.41, Group R: 0.27 ± 0.46, p = 0.68) after surgery between these two groups. Only one patient (6.7%) in Group T required additional topical anesthesia during the surgery. Most of the patients reported the pain experience came from initial trocar insertion in both groups. None of the patients required post operative analgesia in both groups. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that topical anesthesia is a safe and effective anesthetic approach for patients with floaters who underwent 27-gauge PPV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03049163. Registered 8 February 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-0838-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6035792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60357922018-07-12 A comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial Wu, Rong Han Zhang, Rui Lin, Zhong Liang, Qi Hua Moonasar, Nived BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy of topical anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for vitreous floaters. METHODS: 30 patients with vitreous floaters were randomized into Group T (topical anesthesia, proparacaine eye drop) and Group R (retrobulbar anesthesia), and underwent 27-gauge PPV. A 5-point visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) was used to assess patients’ pain experience of anesthesia and surgery procedure (during surgery, 2 h and 1 day after surgery). RESULTS: The VAPS of anesthesia procedure was 1.27 ± 0.59 for patients in Group R, while it was all 0 for patients in Group T (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference for VAPS during surgery (Group T: 1.13 ± 0.74, Group R: 0.67 ± 0.62, p = 0.67), 2 h (Group T: 0.80 ± 1.01, Group R: 0.67 ± 0.62, p = 0.67) and 1 day (Group T: 0.20 ± 0.41, Group R: 0.27 ± 0.46, p = 0.68) after surgery between these two groups. Only one patient (6.7%) in Group T required additional topical anesthesia during the surgery. Most of the patients reported the pain experience came from initial trocar insertion in both groups. None of the patients required post operative analgesia in both groups. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that topical anesthesia is a safe and effective anesthetic approach for patients with floaters who underwent 27-gauge PPV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03049163. Registered 8 February 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-0838-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6035792/ /pubmed/29981573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0838-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Rong Han
Zhang, Rui
Lin, Zhong
Liang, Qi Hua
Moonasar, Nived
A comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial
title A comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial
title_full A comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial
title_short A comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison between topical and retrobulbar anesthesia in 27-gauge vitrectomy for vitreous floaters: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29981573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0838-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wuronghan acomparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangrui acomparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linzhong acomparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liangqihua acomparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moonasarnived acomparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuronghan comparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangrui comparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linzhong comparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liangqihua comparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moonasarnived comparisonbetweentopicalandretrobulbaranesthesiain27gaugevitrectomyforvitreousfloatersarandomizedcontrolledtrial