Cargando…

Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study

BACKGROUND: Diaper rash, also known as diaper dermatitis (DD), is a very common skin condition in infants, and use of disposable diapers with breathable materials is an effective approach for the management of diaper rash. In China, new material diapers and standard diapers are currently the two mos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Chao, Takagi, Rinko, Yao, Xue-Qiu, Xu, Ya-fei, Ishida, Koichi, Toyoshima, Haruko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30035123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5874184
_version_ 1783338082162966528
author Yuan, Chao
Takagi, Rinko
Yao, Xue-Qiu
Xu, Ya-fei
Ishida, Koichi
Toyoshima, Haruko
author_facet Yuan, Chao
Takagi, Rinko
Yao, Xue-Qiu
Xu, Ya-fei
Ishida, Koichi
Toyoshima, Haruko
author_sort Yuan, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diaper rash, also known as diaper dermatitis (DD), is a very common skin condition in infants, and use of disposable diapers with breathable materials is an effective approach for the management of diaper rash. In China, new material diapers and standard diapers are currently the two most commonly used disposable diapers. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of new material diapers versus standard diaper for the prevention of diaper rash in Chinese babies. METHODS: A total of 80 eligible babies admitted to Shanghai Skin Diseases Hospital during the period from June through July, 2016, were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Babies in Group A (n = 41) used the new material diapers, and babies in Group B (n = 39) used standard diapers. Two weeks after the use of the diaper, the babies used the alternate product for the next 2 weeks. Skin conditions were assessed on the front and back waist, right and left buttock, pubic region, anal region, and right and left groin using a 6-point scoring system based on four parameters in 0, 2, and 4 weeks after use of the diapers. RESULTS: There were changes of the mean skin assessment score in each of the six regions after the use of the diapers. There were significant differences, in the mean skin assessment score of the front waist in Group A between weeks 2 and 4 (P = 0.006) and in Group B between weeks 0 and 2 (P = 0.004), and no significant differences were detected in the mean skin assessment score of the back waist and buttock in both Group A and Group B on weeks 0, 2, and 4. A higher mean skin assessment score of the pubic region was assessed in Group A on week 4 than on week 2 (P = 0.036), with a higher score seen on week 2 than on week 0 (P = 0.048), while no significant differences were found in Group B among weeks 0, 2, or 4. There was a higher mean score of the anal region assessed in Group A on week 2 than on week 0 (P = 0.01), while a higher mean score was found in Group B on week 2 than on weeks 0 (P = 0.036) and 4 (P = 0.01). In addition, a higher mean skin assessment score of the groin was detected on week 2 than on week 0 in both Group A (P = 0.00001) and Group B (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The new material diaper is superior to the standard diaper for the prevention of diaper rash in Chinese babies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6035815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60358152018-07-22 Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study Yuan, Chao Takagi, Rinko Yao, Xue-Qiu Xu, Ya-fei Ishida, Koichi Toyoshima, Haruko Biomed Res Int Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Diaper rash, also known as diaper dermatitis (DD), is a very common skin condition in infants, and use of disposable diapers with breathable materials is an effective approach for the management of diaper rash. In China, new material diapers and standard diapers are currently the two most commonly used disposable diapers. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of new material diapers versus standard diaper for the prevention of diaper rash in Chinese babies. METHODS: A total of 80 eligible babies admitted to Shanghai Skin Diseases Hospital during the period from June through July, 2016, were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Babies in Group A (n = 41) used the new material diapers, and babies in Group B (n = 39) used standard diapers. Two weeks after the use of the diaper, the babies used the alternate product for the next 2 weeks. Skin conditions were assessed on the front and back waist, right and left buttock, pubic region, anal region, and right and left groin using a 6-point scoring system based on four parameters in 0, 2, and 4 weeks after use of the diapers. RESULTS: There were changes of the mean skin assessment score in each of the six regions after the use of the diapers. There were significant differences, in the mean skin assessment score of the front waist in Group A between weeks 2 and 4 (P = 0.006) and in Group B between weeks 0 and 2 (P = 0.004), and no significant differences were detected in the mean skin assessment score of the back waist and buttock in both Group A and Group B on weeks 0, 2, and 4. A higher mean skin assessment score of the pubic region was assessed in Group A on week 4 than on week 2 (P = 0.036), with a higher score seen on week 2 than on week 0 (P = 0.048), while no significant differences were found in Group B among weeks 0, 2, or 4. There was a higher mean score of the anal region assessed in Group A on week 2 than on week 0 (P = 0.01), while a higher mean score was found in Group B on week 2 than on weeks 0 (P = 0.036) and 4 (P = 0.01). In addition, a higher mean skin assessment score of the groin was detected on week 2 than on week 0 in both Group A (P = 0.00001) and Group B (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The new material diaper is superior to the standard diaper for the prevention of diaper rash in Chinese babies. Hindawi 2018-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6035815/ /pubmed/30035123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5874184 Text en Copyright © 2018 Chao Yuan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Yuan, Chao
Takagi, Rinko
Yao, Xue-Qiu
Xu, Ya-fei
Ishida, Koichi
Toyoshima, Haruko
Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study
title Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study
title_full Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study
title_short Comparison of the Effectiveness of New Material Diapers versus Standard Diapers for the Prevention of Diaper Rash in Chinese Babies: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled, Cross-Over Study
title_sort comparison of the effectiveness of new material diapers versus standard diapers for the prevention of diaper rash in chinese babies: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled, cross-over study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6035815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30035123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5874184
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanchao comparisonoftheeffectivenessofnewmaterialdiapersversusstandarddiapersforthepreventionofdiaperrashinchinesebabiesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT takagirinko comparisonoftheeffectivenessofnewmaterialdiapersversusstandarddiapersforthepreventionofdiaperrashinchinesebabiesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT yaoxueqiu comparisonoftheeffectivenessofnewmaterialdiapersversusstandarddiapersforthepreventionofdiaperrashinchinesebabiesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT xuyafei comparisonoftheeffectivenessofnewmaterialdiapersversusstandarddiapersforthepreventionofdiaperrashinchinesebabiesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT ishidakoichi comparisonoftheeffectivenessofnewmaterialdiapersversusstandarddiapersforthepreventionofdiaperrashinchinesebabiesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT toyoshimaharuko comparisonoftheeffectivenessofnewmaterialdiapersversusstandarddiapersforthepreventionofdiaperrashinchinesebabiesadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy