Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Detection

BACKGROUND: Methylated Septin9 (mSEPT9) has been suggested as a reliable biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of mSEPT9 for CRC detection in Chinese patients. In addition, we compared the diagnostic efficacy of mSEPT9 to traditional screening met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Li, Jiang, Xiyi, Li, Qian, Sun, Zujun, Quan, Wenqiang, Duan, Yuping, Li, Dong, Chen, Tianhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00247
_version_ 1783338105801015296
author Xie, Li
Jiang, Xiyi
Li, Qian
Sun, Zujun
Quan, Wenqiang
Duan, Yuping
Li, Dong
Chen, Tianhui
author_facet Xie, Li
Jiang, Xiyi
Li, Qian
Sun, Zujun
Quan, Wenqiang
Duan, Yuping
Li, Dong
Chen, Tianhui
author_sort Xie, Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methylated Septin9 (mSEPT9) has been suggested as a reliable biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of mSEPT9 for CRC detection in Chinese patients. In addition, we compared the diagnostic efficacy of mSEPT9 to traditional screening method [fecal occult blood test (FOBT)] and two biomarkers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen-199 (Ca-199)]. METHODS: Overall 248 subjects including 123 patients with CRC and 125 controls were included. Plasma and fecal samples were collected for CEA, Ca-199, mSEPT9, and FOBT tests. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each method; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for the assessment of diagnostic accuracy, and comparisons among FOBT, mSEPT9, and the combination were assessed through area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: mSEPT9 achieved overall sensitivity and specificity of 61.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 53.0–69.9%] and 89.6% (83.0–93.8%), respectively, with an AUC value of 0.757 (95% CI: 0.701–0.807), superior to FOBT [sensitivity: 61.4% (50.9–70.9%); specificity: 70.3% (59.1–79.5%); AUC: 0.658 (0.578–0.723)], CEA [sensitivity: 35.0% (27.1–43.7%); specificity: 62.6% (53.8–70.7%); AUC: 0.485 (0.411–0.559)], and Ca-199 [sensitivity: 17.9% (12.1–25.6%); specificity: 55.7% (48.9–64.1%); AUC: 0.353 (0.283–0.423)]. The combination of mSEPT9 and FOBT further improved sensitivity and AUC value of 84.1% (75.1–90.3%) and 0.807 (0.752–0.863), respectively, while specificity was declined to 62.2% (50.8–72.4%). CONCLUSION: mSEPT9 demonstrated best diagnostic ability in CRC detection compared with FOBT, CEA, and Ca-199. The combination of mSEPT9 and FOBT further improved diagnostic sensitivity especially for early stage disease, which may provide a new approach for future CRC screening, though further investigations are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6036110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60361102018-07-16 Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Detection Xie, Li Jiang, Xiyi Li, Qian Sun, Zujun Quan, Wenqiang Duan, Yuping Li, Dong Chen, Tianhui Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Methylated Septin9 (mSEPT9) has been suggested as a reliable biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of mSEPT9 for CRC detection in Chinese patients. In addition, we compared the diagnostic efficacy of mSEPT9 to traditional screening method [fecal occult blood test (FOBT)] and two biomarkers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen-199 (Ca-199)]. METHODS: Overall 248 subjects including 123 patients with CRC and 125 controls were included. Plasma and fecal samples were collected for CEA, Ca-199, mSEPT9, and FOBT tests. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each method; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted for the assessment of diagnostic accuracy, and comparisons among FOBT, mSEPT9, and the combination were assessed through area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: mSEPT9 achieved overall sensitivity and specificity of 61.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 53.0–69.9%] and 89.6% (83.0–93.8%), respectively, with an AUC value of 0.757 (95% CI: 0.701–0.807), superior to FOBT [sensitivity: 61.4% (50.9–70.9%); specificity: 70.3% (59.1–79.5%); AUC: 0.658 (0.578–0.723)], CEA [sensitivity: 35.0% (27.1–43.7%); specificity: 62.6% (53.8–70.7%); AUC: 0.485 (0.411–0.559)], and Ca-199 [sensitivity: 17.9% (12.1–25.6%); specificity: 55.7% (48.9–64.1%); AUC: 0.353 (0.283–0.423)]. The combination of mSEPT9 and FOBT further improved sensitivity and AUC value of 84.1% (75.1–90.3%) and 0.807 (0.752–0.863), respectively, while specificity was declined to 62.2% (50.8–72.4%). CONCLUSION: mSEPT9 demonstrated best diagnostic ability in CRC detection compared with FOBT, CEA, and Ca-199. The combination of mSEPT9 and FOBT further improved diagnostic sensitivity especially for early stage disease, which may provide a new approach for future CRC screening, though further investigations are warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6036110/ /pubmed/30013949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00247 Text en Copyright © 2018 Xie, Jiang, Li, Sun, Quan, Duan, Li and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xie, Li
Jiang, Xiyi
Li, Qian
Sun, Zujun
Quan, Wenqiang
Duan, Yuping
Li, Dong
Chen, Tianhui
Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Detection
title Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Detection
title_full Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Detection
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Detection
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Detection
title_short Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Detection
title_sort diagnostic value of methylated septin9 for colorectal cancer detection
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00247
work_keys_str_mv AT xieli diagnosticvalueofmethylatedseptin9forcolorectalcancerdetection
AT jiangxiyi diagnosticvalueofmethylatedseptin9forcolorectalcancerdetection
AT liqian diagnosticvalueofmethylatedseptin9forcolorectalcancerdetection
AT sunzujun diagnosticvalueofmethylatedseptin9forcolorectalcancerdetection
AT quanwenqiang diagnosticvalueofmethylatedseptin9forcolorectalcancerdetection
AT duanyuping diagnosticvalueofmethylatedseptin9forcolorectalcancerdetection
AT lidong diagnosticvalueofmethylatedseptin9forcolorectalcancerdetection
AT chentianhui diagnosticvalueofmethylatedseptin9forcolorectalcancerdetection