Cargando…
Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system
In this study, the optimum density scaling factors of phantom materials for a commercially available three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system (Delta4) were investigated in order to improve the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions in the phantom materials. At field sizes of 10 × 10 an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12357 |
_version_ | 1783338149296996352 |
---|---|
author | Tani, Kensuke Fujita, Yukio Wakita, Akihisa Miyasaka, Ryohei Uehara, Ryuzo Kodama, Takumi Suzuki, Yuya Aikawa, Ako Mizuno, Norifumi Kawamori, Jiro Saitoh, Hidetoshi |
author_facet | Tani, Kensuke Fujita, Yukio Wakita, Akihisa Miyasaka, Ryohei Uehara, Ryuzo Kodama, Takumi Suzuki, Yuya Aikawa, Ako Mizuno, Norifumi Kawamori, Jiro Saitoh, Hidetoshi |
author_sort | Tani, Kensuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, the optimum density scaling factors of phantom materials for a commercially available three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system (Delta4) were investigated in order to improve the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions in the phantom materials. At field sizes of 10 × 10 and 5 × 5 cm(2) with the same geometry, tissue‐phantom ratios (TPRs) in water, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and Plastic Water Diagnostic Therapy (PWDT) were measured, and TPRs in various density scaling factors of water were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation, Adaptive Convolve (AdC, Pinnacle(3)), Collapsed Cone Convolution (CCC, RayStation), and AcurosXB (AXB, Eclipse). Effective linear attenuation coefficients (μ (eff)) were obtained from the TPRs. The ratios of μ (eff) in phantom and water ((μ (eff))(pl,water)) were compared between the measurements and calculations. For each phantom material, the density scaling factor proposed in this study (DSF) was set to be the value providing a match between the calculated and measured (μ (eff))(pl,water). The optimum density scaling factor was verified through the comparison of the dose distributions measured by Delta4 and calculated with three different density scaling factors: the nominal physical density (PD), nominal relative electron density (ED), and DSF. Three plans were used for the verifications: a static field of 10 × 10 cm(2) and two intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans. DSF were determined to be 1.13 for PMMA and 0.98 for PWDT. DSF for PMMA showed good agreement for AdC and CCC with 6 MV x ray, and AdC for 10 MV x ray. DSF for PWDT showed good agreement regardless of the dose calculation algorithms and x‐ray energy. DSF can be considered one of the references for the density scaling factor of Delta4 phantom materials and may help improve the accuracy of the IMRT dose verification using Delta4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6036349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60363492018-07-12 Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system Tani, Kensuke Fujita, Yukio Wakita, Akihisa Miyasaka, Ryohei Uehara, Ryuzo Kodama, Takumi Suzuki, Yuya Aikawa, Ako Mizuno, Norifumi Kawamori, Jiro Saitoh, Hidetoshi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In this study, the optimum density scaling factors of phantom materials for a commercially available three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system (Delta4) were investigated in order to improve the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions in the phantom materials. At field sizes of 10 × 10 and 5 × 5 cm(2) with the same geometry, tissue‐phantom ratios (TPRs) in water, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and Plastic Water Diagnostic Therapy (PWDT) were measured, and TPRs in various density scaling factors of water were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation, Adaptive Convolve (AdC, Pinnacle(3)), Collapsed Cone Convolution (CCC, RayStation), and AcurosXB (AXB, Eclipse). Effective linear attenuation coefficients (μ (eff)) were obtained from the TPRs. The ratios of μ (eff) in phantom and water ((μ (eff))(pl,water)) were compared between the measurements and calculations. For each phantom material, the density scaling factor proposed in this study (DSF) was set to be the value providing a match between the calculated and measured (μ (eff))(pl,water). The optimum density scaling factor was verified through the comparison of the dose distributions measured by Delta4 and calculated with three different density scaling factors: the nominal physical density (PD), nominal relative electron density (ED), and DSF. Three plans were used for the verifications: a static field of 10 × 10 cm(2) and two intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans. DSF were determined to be 1.13 for PMMA and 0.98 for PWDT. DSF for PMMA showed good agreement for AdC and CCC with 6 MV x ray, and AdC for 10 MV x ray. DSF for PWDT showed good agreement regardless of the dose calculation algorithms and x‐ray energy. DSF can be considered one of the references for the density scaling factor of Delta4 phantom materials and may help improve the accuracy of the IMRT dose verification using Delta4. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6036349/ /pubmed/29785725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12357 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Tani, Kensuke Fujita, Yukio Wakita, Akihisa Miyasaka, Ryohei Uehara, Ryuzo Kodama, Takumi Suzuki, Yuya Aikawa, Ako Mizuno, Norifumi Kawamori, Jiro Saitoh, Hidetoshi Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system |
title | Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system |
title_full | Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system |
title_fullStr | Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system |
title_full_unstemmed | Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system |
title_short | Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system |
title_sort | density scaling of phantom materials for a 3d dose verification system |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12357 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanikensuke densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT fujitayukio densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT wakitaakihisa densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT miyasakaryohei densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT uehararyuzo densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT kodamatakumi densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT suzukiyuya densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT aikawaako densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT mizunonorifumi densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT kawamorijiro densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem AT saitohhidetoshi densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem |