Cargando…

Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system

In this study, the optimum density scaling factors of phantom materials for a commercially available three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system (Delta4) were investigated in order to improve the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions in the phantom materials. At field sizes of 10 × 10 an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tani, Kensuke, Fujita, Yukio, Wakita, Akihisa, Miyasaka, Ryohei, Uehara, Ryuzo, Kodama, Takumi, Suzuki, Yuya, Aikawa, Ako, Mizuno, Norifumi, Kawamori, Jiro, Saitoh, Hidetoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12357
_version_ 1783338149296996352
author Tani, Kensuke
Fujita, Yukio
Wakita, Akihisa
Miyasaka, Ryohei
Uehara, Ryuzo
Kodama, Takumi
Suzuki, Yuya
Aikawa, Ako
Mizuno, Norifumi
Kawamori, Jiro
Saitoh, Hidetoshi
author_facet Tani, Kensuke
Fujita, Yukio
Wakita, Akihisa
Miyasaka, Ryohei
Uehara, Ryuzo
Kodama, Takumi
Suzuki, Yuya
Aikawa, Ako
Mizuno, Norifumi
Kawamori, Jiro
Saitoh, Hidetoshi
author_sort Tani, Kensuke
collection PubMed
description In this study, the optimum density scaling factors of phantom materials for a commercially available three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system (Delta4) were investigated in order to improve the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions in the phantom materials. At field sizes of 10 × 10 and 5 × 5 cm(2) with the same geometry, tissue‐phantom ratios (TPRs) in water, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and Plastic Water Diagnostic Therapy (PWDT) were measured, and TPRs in various density scaling factors of water were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation, Adaptive Convolve (AdC, Pinnacle(3)), Collapsed Cone Convolution (CCC, RayStation), and AcurosXB (AXB, Eclipse). Effective linear attenuation coefficients (μ (eff)) were obtained from the TPRs. The ratios of μ (eff) in phantom and water ((μ (eff))(pl,water)) were compared between the measurements and calculations. For each phantom material, the density scaling factor proposed in this study (DSF) was set to be the value providing a match between the calculated and measured (μ (eff))(pl,water). The optimum density scaling factor was verified through the comparison of the dose distributions measured by Delta4 and calculated with three different density scaling factors: the nominal physical density (PD), nominal relative electron density (ED), and DSF. Three plans were used for the verifications: a static field of 10 × 10 cm(2) and two intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans. DSF were determined to be 1.13 for PMMA and 0.98 for PWDT. DSF for PMMA showed good agreement for AdC and CCC with 6 MV x ray, and AdC for 10 MV x ray. DSF for PWDT showed good agreement regardless of the dose calculation algorithms and x‐ray energy. DSF can be considered one of the references for the density scaling factor of Delta4 phantom materials and may help improve the accuracy of the IMRT dose verification using Delta4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6036349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60363492018-07-12 Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system Tani, Kensuke Fujita, Yukio Wakita, Akihisa Miyasaka, Ryohei Uehara, Ryuzo Kodama, Takumi Suzuki, Yuya Aikawa, Ako Mizuno, Norifumi Kawamori, Jiro Saitoh, Hidetoshi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In this study, the optimum density scaling factors of phantom materials for a commercially available three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system (Delta4) were investigated in order to improve the accuracy of the calculated dose distributions in the phantom materials. At field sizes of 10 × 10 and 5 × 5 cm(2) with the same geometry, tissue‐phantom ratios (TPRs) in water, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and Plastic Water Diagnostic Therapy (PWDT) were measured, and TPRs in various density scaling factors of water were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation, Adaptive Convolve (AdC, Pinnacle(3)), Collapsed Cone Convolution (CCC, RayStation), and AcurosXB (AXB, Eclipse). Effective linear attenuation coefficients (μ (eff)) were obtained from the TPRs. The ratios of μ (eff) in phantom and water ((μ (eff))(pl,water)) were compared between the measurements and calculations. For each phantom material, the density scaling factor proposed in this study (DSF) was set to be the value providing a match between the calculated and measured (μ (eff))(pl,water). The optimum density scaling factor was verified through the comparison of the dose distributions measured by Delta4 and calculated with three different density scaling factors: the nominal physical density (PD), nominal relative electron density (ED), and DSF. Three plans were used for the verifications: a static field of 10 × 10 cm(2) and two intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment plans. DSF were determined to be 1.13 for PMMA and 0.98 for PWDT. DSF for PMMA showed good agreement for AdC and CCC with 6 MV x ray, and AdC for 10 MV x ray. DSF for PWDT showed good agreement regardless of the dose calculation algorithms and x‐ray energy. DSF can be considered one of the references for the density scaling factor of Delta4 phantom materials and may help improve the accuracy of the IMRT dose verification using Delta4. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6036349/ /pubmed/29785725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12357 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Tani, Kensuke
Fujita, Yukio
Wakita, Akihisa
Miyasaka, Ryohei
Uehara, Ryuzo
Kodama, Takumi
Suzuki, Yuya
Aikawa, Ako
Mizuno, Norifumi
Kawamori, Jiro
Saitoh, Hidetoshi
Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system
title Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system
title_full Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system
title_fullStr Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system
title_full_unstemmed Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system
title_short Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system
title_sort density scaling of phantom materials for a 3d dose verification system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12357
work_keys_str_mv AT tanikensuke densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT fujitayukio densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT wakitaakihisa densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT miyasakaryohei densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT uehararyuzo densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT kodamatakumi densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT suzukiyuya densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT aikawaako densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT mizunonorifumi densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT kawamorijiro densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem
AT saitohhidetoshi densityscalingofphantommaterialsfora3ddoseverificationsystem