Cargando…

Relationship between size‐specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size

This study investigates the relationship between contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) and size‐specific dose estimate (SSDE) in computed tomography (CT) depending on patient size. In addition, the relationship to the auto exposure control (AEC) techniques is examined. A tissue‐equivalent material having hu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawashima, Hiroki, Ichikawa, Katsuhiro, Hanaoka, Shinsuke, Matsubara, Kosuke, Takata, Tadanori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29729075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12340
_version_ 1783338152806580224
author Kawashima, Hiroki
Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
Hanaoka, Shinsuke
Matsubara, Kosuke
Takata, Tadanori
author_facet Kawashima, Hiroki
Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
Hanaoka, Shinsuke
Matsubara, Kosuke
Takata, Tadanori
author_sort Kawashima, Hiroki
collection PubMed
description This study investigates the relationship between contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) and size‐specific dose estimate (SSDE) in computed tomography (CT) depending on patient size. In addition, the relationship to the auto exposure control (AEC) techniques is examined. A tissue‐equivalent material having human‐liver energy dependence is developed and used to evaluate these relationships. Three exposure dose levels (constant CT dose index, constant SSDE, and with AEC) are tested using four different phantom sizes (diameter: 15, 20, 25 and 30 cm) in two different CT scanners (SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens, and LightSpeed VCT, GE). The contrast‐to‐noise ratios (CNRs) are measured using the developed phantom. It is found that the CNR increases with decreasing phantom size at constant SSDE, although the increase ratio is smaller than that of the constant CT dose index. This result indicates that the image characteristics differ even when the patient dose received from the CT examination is equivalent for each patient size. In the case of AEC use, the CNR results of the Siemens scanner exhibit a similar trend to those obtained for constant SSDE, for each phantom size. This suggests that the AEC technique that maintains a constant image quality (CARE Dose 4D) for each patient size corresponds well to the image quality obtained for constant SSDE. These findings facilitate further understanding of the relationship between image quality and exposure CT dose depending on patient size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6036365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60363652018-07-12 Relationship between size‐specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size Kawashima, Hiroki Ichikawa, Katsuhiro Hanaoka, Shinsuke Matsubara, Kosuke Takata, Tadanori J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging This study investigates the relationship between contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) and size‐specific dose estimate (SSDE) in computed tomography (CT) depending on patient size. In addition, the relationship to the auto exposure control (AEC) techniques is examined. A tissue‐equivalent material having human‐liver energy dependence is developed and used to evaluate these relationships. Three exposure dose levels (constant CT dose index, constant SSDE, and with AEC) are tested using four different phantom sizes (diameter: 15, 20, 25 and 30 cm) in two different CT scanners (SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens, and LightSpeed VCT, GE). The contrast‐to‐noise ratios (CNRs) are measured using the developed phantom. It is found that the CNR increases with decreasing phantom size at constant SSDE, although the increase ratio is smaller than that of the constant CT dose index. This result indicates that the image characteristics differ even when the patient dose received from the CT examination is equivalent for each patient size. In the case of AEC use, the CNR results of the Siemens scanner exhibit a similar trend to those obtained for constant SSDE, for each phantom size. This suggests that the AEC technique that maintains a constant image quality (CARE Dose 4D) for each patient size corresponds well to the image quality obtained for constant SSDE. These findings facilitate further understanding of the relationship between image quality and exposure CT dose depending on patient size. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6036365/ /pubmed/29729075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12340 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Kawashima, Hiroki
Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
Hanaoka, Shinsuke
Matsubara, Kosuke
Takata, Tadanori
Relationship between size‐specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size
title Relationship between size‐specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size
title_full Relationship between size‐specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size
title_fullStr Relationship between size‐specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between size‐specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size
title_short Relationship between size‐specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size
title_sort relationship between size‐specific dose estimates and image quality in computed tomography depending on patient size
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29729075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12340
work_keys_str_mv AT kawashimahiroki relationshipbetweensizespecificdoseestimatesandimagequalityincomputedtomographydependingonpatientsize
AT ichikawakatsuhiro relationshipbetweensizespecificdoseestimatesandimagequalityincomputedtomographydependingonpatientsize
AT hanaokashinsuke relationshipbetweensizespecificdoseestimatesandimagequalityincomputedtomographydependingonpatientsize
AT matsubarakosuke relationshipbetweensizespecificdoseestimatesandimagequalityincomputedtomographydependingonpatientsize
AT takatatadanori relationshipbetweensizespecificdoseestimatesandimagequalityincomputedtomographydependingonpatientsize