Cargando…

Evaluation of the dosimetry approaches in ablation treatment of thyroid cancer

In this study, we aimed to evaluate dosimetric approaches in ablation treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (DTC) without interrupting the clinical routine. Prior to therapy, 10.7 MBq (131)I in average was orally given to 24 patients suffering from DTC. MIRD formalism was used for dosimetric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alan Selcuk, Nalan, Toklu, Turkay, Beykan, Seval, Karaaslan, Serife Ipek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29858536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12350
_version_ 1783338153494446080
author Alan Selcuk, Nalan
Toklu, Turkay
Beykan, Seval
Karaaslan, Serife Ipek
author_facet Alan Selcuk, Nalan
Toklu, Turkay
Beykan, Seval
Karaaslan, Serife Ipek
author_sort Alan Selcuk, Nalan
collection PubMed
description In this study, we aimed to evaluate dosimetric approaches in ablation treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (DTC) without interrupting the clinical routine. Prior to therapy, 10.7 MBq (131)I in average was orally given to 24 patients suffering from DTC. MIRD formalism was used for dosimetric calculations. For blood and bone marrow dosimetry, blood samples and whole‐body counts were collected at 2, 24, 72, and 120 h after I‐131 administration. For remnant tissue dosimetry, uptake measurements were performed at the same time intervals. To estimate the remnant volume, anterior and lateral planar gamma camera images were acquired with a reference source within the field of view at 24 h after I‐131 administration. Ultrasound imaging was also performed. Treatment activities determined with the fixed activity method were administered to the patients. Secondary cancer risk relative to applied therapy was evaluated for dosimetric approaches. The average dose to blood and bone marrow were determined as 0.15 ± 0.04 and 0.11 ± 0.04 Gy/GBq, respectively. The average remnant tissue dose was 0.58 ± 0.52 Gy/MBq and the corresponding required activity to ablate the remnant was approximately 1.3 GBq of (131)I. A strong correlation between 24th‐hour uptake and time‐integrated activity coefficient values was obtained. Compared to fixed activity method, approximately five times higher secondary cancer risk was determined in bone marrow dosimetry, while the risk was about three times lower in lesion‐based dosimetry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6036368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60363682018-07-12 Evaluation of the dosimetry approaches in ablation treatment of thyroid cancer Alan Selcuk, Nalan Toklu, Turkay Beykan, Seval Karaaslan, Serife Ipek J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In this study, we aimed to evaluate dosimetric approaches in ablation treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (DTC) without interrupting the clinical routine. Prior to therapy, 10.7 MBq (131)I in average was orally given to 24 patients suffering from DTC. MIRD formalism was used for dosimetric calculations. For blood and bone marrow dosimetry, blood samples and whole‐body counts were collected at 2, 24, 72, and 120 h after I‐131 administration. For remnant tissue dosimetry, uptake measurements were performed at the same time intervals. To estimate the remnant volume, anterior and lateral planar gamma camera images were acquired with a reference source within the field of view at 24 h after I‐131 administration. Ultrasound imaging was also performed. Treatment activities determined with the fixed activity method were administered to the patients. Secondary cancer risk relative to applied therapy was evaluated for dosimetric approaches. The average dose to blood and bone marrow were determined as 0.15 ± 0.04 and 0.11 ± 0.04 Gy/GBq, respectively. The average remnant tissue dose was 0.58 ± 0.52 Gy/MBq and the corresponding required activity to ablate the remnant was approximately 1.3 GBq of (131)I. A strong correlation between 24th‐hour uptake and time‐integrated activity coefficient values was obtained. Compared to fixed activity method, approximately five times higher secondary cancer risk was determined in bone marrow dosimetry, while the risk was about three times lower in lesion‐based dosimetry. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6036368/ /pubmed/29858536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12350 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Alan Selcuk, Nalan
Toklu, Turkay
Beykan, Seval
Karaaslan, Serife Ipek
Evaluation of the dosimetry approaches in ablation treatment of thyroid cancer
title Evaluation of the dosimetry approaches in ablation treatment of thyroid cancer
title_full Evaluation of the dosimetry approaches in ablation treatment of thyroid cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of the dosimetry approaches in ablation treatment of thyroid cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the dosimetry approaches in ablation treatment of thyroid cancer
title_short Evaluation of the dosimetry approaches in ablation treatment of thyroid cancer
title_sort evaluation of the dosimetry approaches in ablation treatment of thyroid cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29858536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12350
work_keys_str_mv AT alanselcuknalan evaluationofthedosimetryapproachesinablationtreatmentofthyroidcancer
AT tokluturkay evaluationofthedosimetryapproachesinablationtreatmentofthyroidcancer
AT beykanseval evaluationofthedosimetryapproachesinablationtreatmentofthyroidcancer
AT karaaslanserifeipek evaluationofthedosimetryapproachesinablationtreatmentofthyroidcancer