Cargando…
Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images
We present the development of a two‐component magnetic resonance (MR) fiducial system, that is, a fiducial marker device combined with an auto‐segmentation algorithm, designed to be paired with existing ultrasound probe tracking and image fusion technology to automatically fuse MR and ultrasound (US...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12352 |
_version_ | 1783338157340622848 |
---|---|
author | Favazza, Christopher P. Gorny, Krzysztof R. Callstrom, Matthew R. Kurup, Anil N. Washburn, Michael Trester, Pamela S. Fowler, Charles L. Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. |
author_facet | Favazza, Christopher P. Gorny, Krzysztof R. Callstrom, Matthew R. Kurup, Anil N. Washburn, Michael Trester, Pamela S. Fowler, Charles L. Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. |
author_sort | Favazza, Christopher P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present the development of a two‐component magnetic resonance (MR) fiducial system, that is, a fiducial marker device combined with an auto‐segmentation algorithm, designed to be paired with existing ultrasound probe tracking and image fusion technology to automatically fuse MR and ultrasound (US) images. The fiducial device consisted of four ~6.4 mL cylindrical wells filled with 1 g/L copper sulfate solution. The algorithm was designed to automatically segment the device in clinical abdominal MR images. The algorithm's detection rate and repeatability were investigated through a phantom study and in human volunteers. The detection rate was 100% in all phantom and human images. The center‐of‐mass of the fiducial device was robustly identified with maximum variations of 2.9 mm in position and 0.9° in angular orientation. In volunteer images, average differences between algorithm‐measured inter‐marker spacings and actual separation distances were 0.53 ± 0.36 mm. “Proof‐of‐concept” automatic MR‐US fusions were conducted with sets of images from both a phantom and volunteer using a commercial prototype system, which was built based on the above findings. Image fusion accuracy was measured to be within 5 mm for breath‐hold scanning. These results demonstrate the capability of this approach to automatically fuse US and MR images acquired across a wide range of clinical abdominal pulse sequences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6036384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60363842018-07-12 Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images Favazza, Christopher P. Gorny, Krzysztof R. Callstrom, Matthew R. Kurup, Anil N. Washburn, Michael Trester, Pamela S. Fowler, Charles L. Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging We present the development of a two‐component magnetic resonance (MR) fiducial system, that is, a fiducial marker device combined with an auto‐segmentation algorithm, designed to be paired with existing ultrasound probe tracking and image fusion technology to automatically fuse MR and ultrasound (US) images. The fiducial device consisted of four ~6.4 mL cylindrical wells filled with 1 g/L copper sulfate solution. The algorithm was designed to automatically segment the device in clinical abdominal MR images. The algorithm's detection rate and repeatability were investigated through a phantom study and in human volunteers. The detection rate was 100% in all phantom and human images. The center‐of‐mass of the fiducial device was robustly identified with maximum variations of 2.9 mm in position and 0.9° in angular orientation. In volunteer images, average differences between algorithm‐measured inter‐marker spacings and actual separation distances were 0.53 ± 0.36 mm. “Proof‐of‐concept” automatic MR‐US fusions were conducted with sets of images from both a phantom and volunteer using a commercial prototype system, which was built based on the above findings. Image fusion accuracy was measured to be within 5 mm for breath‐hold scanning. These results demonstrate the capability of this approach to automatically fuse US and MR images acquired across a wide range of clinical abdominal pulse sequences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6036384/ /pubmed/29785834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12352 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Favazza, Christopher P. Gorny, Krzysztof R. Callstrom, Matthew R. Kurup, Anil N. Washburn, Michael Trester, Pamela S. Fowler, Charles L. Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images |
title | Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images |
title_full | Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images |
title_fullStr | Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images |
title_short | Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images |
title_sort | development of a robust mri fiducial system for automated fusion of mr‐us abdominal images |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT favazzachristopherp developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages AT gornykrzysztofr developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages AT callstrommatthewr developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages AT kurupaniln developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages AT washburnmichael developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages AT tresterpamelas developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages AT fowlercharlesl developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages AT hangiandreounicholasj developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages |