Cargando…

Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images

We present the development of a two‐component magnetic resonance (MR) fiducial system, that is, a fiducial marker device combined with an auto‐segmentation algorithm, designed to be paired with existing ultrasound probe tracking and image fusion technology to automatically fuse MR and ultrasound (US...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Favazza, Christopher P., Gorny, Krzysztof R., Callstrom, Matthew R., Kurup, Anil N., Washburn, Michael, Trester, Pamela S., Fowler, Charles L., Hangiandreou, Nicholas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12352
_version_ 1783338157340622848
author Favazza, Christopher P.
Gorny, Krzysztof R.
Callstrom, Matthew R.
Kurup, Anil N.
Washburn, Michael
Trester, Pamela S.
Fowler, Charles L.
Hangiandreou, Nicholas J.
author_facet Favazza, Christopher P.
Gorny, Krzysztof R.
Callstrom, Matthew R.
Kurup, Anil N.
Washburn, Michael
Trester, Pamela S.
Fowler, Charles L.
Hangiandreou, Nicholas J.
author_sort Favazza, Christopher P.
collection PubMed
description We present the development of a two‐component magnetic resonance (MR) fiducial system, that is, a fiducial marker device combined with an auto‐segmentation algorithm, designed to be paired with existing ultrasound probe tracking and image fusion technology to automatically fuse MR and ultrasound (US) images. The fiducial device consisted of four ~6.4 mL cylindrical wells filled with 1 g/L copper sulfate solution. The algorithm was designed to automatically segment the device in clinical abdominal MR images. The algorithm's detection rate and repeatability were investigated through a phantom study and in human volunteers. The detection rate was 100% in all phantom and human images. The center‐of‐mass of the fiducial device was robustly identified with maximum variations of 2.9 mm in position and 0.9° in angular orientation. In volunteer images, average differences between algorithm‐measured inter‐marker spacings and actual separation distances were 0.53 ± 0.36 mm. “Proof‐of‐concept” automatic MR‐US fusions were conducted with sets of images from both a phantom and volunteer using a commercial prototype system, which was built based on the above findings. Image fusion accuracy was measured to be within 5 mm for breath‐hold scanning. These results demonstrate the capability of this approach to automatically fuse US and MR images acquired across a wide range of clinical abdominal pulse sequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6036384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60363842018-07-12 Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images Favazza, Christopher P. Gorny, Krzysztof R. Callstrom, Matthew R. Kurup, Anil N. Washburn, Michael Trester, Pamela S. Fowler, Charles L. Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging We present the development of a two‐component magnetic resonance (MR) fiducial system, that is, a fiducial marker device combined with an auto‐segmentation algorithm, designed to be paired with existing ultrasound probe tracking and image fusion technology to automatically fuse MR and ultrasound (US) images. The fiducial device consisted of four ~6.4 mL cylindrical wells filled with 1 g/L copper sulfate solution. The algorithm was designed to automatically segment the device in clinical abdominal MR images. The algorithm's detection rate and repeatability were investigated through a phantom study and in human volunteers. The detection rate was 100% in all phantom and human images. The center‐of‐mass of the fiducial device was robustly identified with maximum variations of 2.9 mm in position and 0.9° in angular orientation. In volunteer images, average differences between algorithm‐measured inter‐marker spacings and actual separation distances were 0.53 ± 0.36 mm. “Proof‐of‐concept” automatic MR‐US fusions were conducted with sets of images from both a phantom and volunteer using a commercial prototype system, which was built based on the above findings. Image fusion accuracy was measured to be within 5 mm for breath‐hold scanning. These results demonstrate the capability of this approach to automatically fuse US and MR images acquired across a wide range of clinical abdominal pulse sequences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6036384/ /pubmed/29785834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12352 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Favazza, Christopher P.
Gorny, Krzysztof R.
Callstrom, Matthew R.
Kurup, Anil N.
Washburn, Michael
Trester, Pamela S.
Fowler, Charles L.
Hangiandreou, Nicholas J.
Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images
title Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images
title_full Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images
title_fullStr Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images
title_full_unstemmed Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images
title_short Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images
title_sort development of a robust mri fiducial system for automated fusion of mr‐us abdominal images
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12352
work_keys_str_mv AT favazzachristopherp developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages
AT gornykrzysztofr developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages
AT callstrommatthewr developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages
AT kurupaniln developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages
AT washburnmichael developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages
AT tresterpamelas developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages
AT fowlercharlesl developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages
AT hangiandreounicholasj developmentofarobustmrifiducialsystemforautomatedfusionofmrusabdominalimages