Cargando…
Humic Substances Alter Ammonia Production and the Microbial Populations Within a RUSITEC Fed a Mixed Hay – Concentrate Diet
Humic substances are a novel feed additive which may have the potential to mitigate enteric methane (CH(4)) production from ruminants as well as enhance microbial activity in the rumen. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of humic substances on fermentation characteristics and microbial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01410 |
_version_ | 1783338189537148928 |
---|---|
author | Terry, Stephanie A. Ramos, Aline F. O. Holman, Devin B. McAllister, Tim A. Breves, Gerhard Chaves, Alexandre V. |
author_facet | Terry, Stephanie A. Ramos, Aline F. O. Holman, Devin B. McAllister, Tim A. Breves, Gerhard Chaves, Alexandre V. |
author_sort | Terry, Stephanie A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humic substances are a novel feed additive which may have the potential to mitigate enteric methane (CH(4)) production from ruminants as well as enhance microbial activity in the rumen. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of humic substances on fermentation characteristics and microbial communities using the rumen stimulation technique (RUSITEC). The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design with 3 treatments duplicated in 2 runs (a 15-day period each run) with 2 replicates per run. Treatments consisted of a control diet (forage:concentrate; 60:40) without humic substances or humic substances added at either 1.5 g/d or 3.0 g/d. Dry matter disappearance, pH, fermentation parameters and gas production were measured from day 8 to 15. Samples for microbial profiling were taken on day 5, 10, and 15 using the digested feed bags for solid- associated microbes (SAM) and fermenter fluid for liquid- associated microbes (LAM). The inclusion of humic substances had no effect (P ≥ 0.19) on DM disappearance, pH or the concentrations of VFA. The production of NH(3) was linearly decreased (P = 0.04) with increasing levels of humic substances in the diet. There was no effect (P ≥ 0.43) of humic substances on total gas, CO(2) or CH(4) production. The number of OTUs was significantly reduced in the 3.0 g/d treatment compared to the control on d 10 and 15; however, the microbial community structure was largely unaffected (P > 0.05). In the SAM samples, the genera Lachnospiraceae XPB1014 group, Succiniclasticum, and Fibrobacter were reduced in the 3.0 g/d treatment and Anaeroplasma, Olsenella, and Pseudobutyrivibrio were increased on day 5, 10, and 15. Within the LAM samples, Christensenellaceae R-7 and Succiniclasticum were the most differentially abundant genera between the control and 3.0 g/d HS treatment samples (P < 0.05). This study highlights the potential use of humic substances as a natural feed additive which may play a role in nitrogen metabolism without negatively affecting the ruminal microbiota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6036602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60366022018-07-16 Humic Substances Alter Ammonia Production and the Microbial Populations Within a RUSITEC Fed a Mixed Hay – Concentrate Diet Terry, Stephanie A. Ramos, Aline F. O. Holman, Devin B. McAllister, Tim A. Breves, Gerhard Chaves, Alexandre V. Front Microbiol Microbiology Humic substances are a novel feed additive which may have the potential to mitigate enteric methane (CH(4)) production from ruminants as well as enhance microbial activity in the rumen. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of humic substances on fermentation characteristics and microbial communities using the rumen stimulation technique (RUSITEC). The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design with 3 treatments duplicated in 2 runs (a 15-day period each run) with 2 replicates per run. Treatments consisted of a control diet (forage:concentrate; 60:40) without humic substances or humic substances added at either 1.5 g/d or 3.0 g/d. Dry matter disappearance, pH, fermentation parameters and gas production were measured from day 8 to 15. Samples for microbial profiling were taken on day 5, 10, and 15 using the digested feed bags for solid- associated microbes (SAM) and fermenter fluid for liquid- associated microbes (LAM). The inclusion of humic substances had no effect (P ≥ 0.19) on DM disappearance, pH or the concentrations of VFA. The production of NH(3) was linearly decreased (P = 0.04) with increasing levels of humic substances in the diet. There was no effect (P ≥ 0.43) of humic substances on total gas, CO(2) or CH(4) production. The number of OTUs was significantly reduced in the 3.0 g/d treatment compared to the control on d 10 and 15; however, the microbial community structure was largely unaffected (P > 0.05). In the SAM samples, the genera Lachnospiraceae XPB1014 group, Succiniclasticum, and Fibrobacter were reduced in the 3.0 g/d treatment and Anaeroplasma, Olsenella, and Pseudobutyrivibrio were increased on day 5, 10, and 15. Within the LAM samples, Christensenellaceae R-7 and Succiniclasticum were the most differentially abundant genera between the control and 3.0 g/d HS treatment samples (P < 0.05). This study highlights the potential use of humic substances as a natural feed additive which may play a role in nitrogen metabolism without negatively affecting the ruminal microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6036602/ /pubmed/30013529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01410 Text en Copyright © 2018 Terry, Ramos, Holman, McAllister, Breves and Chaves. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Terry, Stephanie A. Ramos, Aline F. O. Holman, Devin B. McAllister, Tim A. Breves, Gerhard Chaves, Alexandre V. Humic Substances Alter Ammonia Production and the Microbial Populations Within a RUSITEC Fed a Mixed Hay – Concentrate Diet |
title | Humic Substances Alter Ammonia Production and the Microbial Populations Within a RUSITEC Fed a Mixed Hay – Concentrate Diet |
title_full | Humic Substances Alter Ammonia Production and the Microbial Populations Within a RUSITEC Fed a Mixed Hay – Concentrate Diet |
title_fullStr | Humic Substances Alter Ammonia Production and the Microbial Populations Within a RUSITEC Fed a Mixed Hay – Concentrate Diet |
title_full_unstemmed | Humic Substances Alter Ammonia Production and the Microbial Populations Within a RUSITEC Fed a Mixed Hay – Concentrate Diet |
title_short | Humic Substances Alter Ammonia Production and the Microbial Populations Within a RUSITEC Fed a Mixed Hay – Concentrate Diet |
title_sort | humic substances alter ammonia production and the microbial populations within a rusitec fed a mixed hay – concentrate diet |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terrystephaniea humicsubstancesalterammoniaproductionandthemicrobialpopulationswithinarusitecfedamixedhayconcentratediet AT ramosalinefo humicsubstancesalterammoniaproductionandthemicrobialpopulationswithinarusitecfedamixedhayconcentratediet AT holmandevinb humicsubstancesalterammoniaproductionandthemicrobialpopulationswithinarusitecfedamixedhayconcentratediet AT mcallistertima humicsubstancesalterammoniaproductionandthemicrobialpopulationswithinarusitecfedamixedhayconcentratediet AT brevesgerhard humicsubstancesalterammoniaproductionandthemicrobialpopulationswithinarusitecfedamixedhayconcentratediet AT chavesalexandrev humicsubstancesalterammoniaproductionandthemicrobialpopulationswithinarusitecfedamixedhayconcentratediet |