Cargando…
Fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become a useful method of fabrication for many clinical applications. It is also a technique that is becoming increasingly accessible, as the price of the necessary tools and supplies decline. One emerging, and unreported, application for 3D printing i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-017-0011-6 |
_version_ | 1783338217439756288 |
---|---|
author | Cox, Benjamin L. Schumacher, Nathan Konieczny, John Reifschneider, Issac Mackie, Thomas R. Otegui, Marisa S. Eliceiri, Kevin W. |
author_facet | Cox, Benjamin L. Schumacher, Nathan Konieczny, John Reifschneider, Issac Mackie, Thomas R. Otegui, Marisa S. Eliceiri, Kevin W. |
author_sort | Cox, Benjamin L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become a useful method of fabrication for many clinical applications. It is also a technique that is becoming increasingly accessible, as the price of the necessary tools and supplies decline. One emerging, and unreported, application for 3D printing is to aid in the visualization of 3D imaging data by creating physical models of select structures of interest. METHODS: Presented here are three physical models that were fabricated from three different 3D microscopy datasets. Different methods of fabrication and imaging techniques were used in each case. RESULTS: Each model is presented in detail. This includes the imaging modality used to capture the raw data, the software used to create any computer models and the 3D printing tools used to create each model. Despite the differences in their creation, these examples follow a simple common workflow that is also detailed. CONCLUSIONS: Following these approaches, one can easily make 3D printed models from 3D microscopy datasets utilizing off the shelf commercially available software and hardware. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6036764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60367642018-07-24 Fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data Cox, Benjamin L. Schumacher, Nathan Konieczny, John Reifschneider, Issac Mackie, Thomas R. Otegui, Marisa S. Eliceiri, Kevin W. 3D Print Med Research BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become a useful method of fabrication for many clinical applications. It is also a technique that is becoming increasingly accessible, as the price of the necessary tools and supplies decline. One emerging, and unreported, application for 3D printing is to aid in the visualization of 3D imaging data by creating physical models of select structures of interest. METHODS: Presented here are three physical models that were fabricated from three different 3D microscopy datasets. Different methods of fabrication and imaging techniques were used in each case. RESULTS: Each model is presented in detail. This includes the imaging modality used to capture the raw data, the software used to create any computer models and the 3D printing tools used to create each model. Despite the differences in their creation, these examples follow a simple common workflow that is also detailed. CONCLUSIONS: Following these approaches, one can easily make 3D printed models from 3D microscopy datasets utilizing off the shelf commercially available software and hardware. Springer International Publishing 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6036764/ /pubmed/30050979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-017-0011-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Cox, Benjamin L. Schumacher, Nathan Konieczny, John Reifschneider, Issac Mackie, Thomas R. Otegui, Marisa S. Eliceiri, Kevin W. Fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data |
title | Fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data |
title_full | Fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data |
title_fullStr | Fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data |
title_full_unstemmed | Fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data |
title_short | Fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data |
title_sort | fabrication approaches for the creation of physical models from microscopy data |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-017-0011-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coxbenjaminl fabricationapproachesforthecreationofphysicalmodelsfrommicroscopydata AT schumachernathan fabricationapproachesforthecreationofphysicalmodelsfrommicroscopydata AT koniecznyjohn fabricationapproachesforthecreationofphysicalmodelsfrommicroscopydata AT reifschneiderissac fabricationapproachesforthecreationofphysicalmodelsfrommicroscopydata AT mackiethomasr fabricationapproachesforthecreationofphysicalmodelsfrommicroscopydata AT oteguimarisas fabricationapproachesforthecreationofphysicalmodelsfrommicroscopydata AT eliceirikevinw fabricationapproachesforthecreationofphysicalmodelsfrommicroscopydata |