Cargando…

Accuracy of Leg Length and Offset Restoration in Femoral Pinless Navigation Compared to Navigation Using a Fixed Pin during Total Hip Arthroplasty

Equalization of biomechanical differences is a major goal in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study we compared the accuracy of restoring leg length and offset using imageless navigation with an osseous fixed pin to a femoral pinless device in 97 minimally invasive THAs through an antero...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Markus, Thieme, Max, Kaiser, Moritz, Völlner, Florian, Worlicek, Michael, Craiovan, Benjamin, Grifka, Joachim, Renkawitz, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1639840
_version_ 1783338235449049088
author Weber, Markus
Thieme, Max
Kaiser, Moritz
Völlner, Florian
Worlicek, Michael
Craiovan, Benjamin
Grifka, Joachim
Renkawitz, Tobias
author_facet Weber, Markus
Thieme, Max
Kaiser, Moritz
Völlner, Florian
Worlicek, Michael
Craiovan, Benjamin
Grifka, Joachim
Renkawitz, Tobias
author_sort Weber, Markus
collection PubMed
description Equalization of biomechanical differences is a major goal in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study we compared the accuracy of restoring leg length and offset using imageless navigation with an osseous fixed pin to a femoral pinless device in 97 minimally invasive THAs through an anterolateral approach in the lateral decubitus position. Leg length and offset differences were evaluated on magnification-corrected radiographs by a blinded observer. A postoperative mean difference of -0.9 mm (95% CI -2.8 mm to 1.1 mm, p = 0.38) between pinless navigation and navigation with a fixed pin was observed for leg length and that of -2.4 mm (95% CI -3.9 mm to -0.9 mm, p = 0.002) was observed for offset, respectively. The number of patients with a residual difference below 5 mm after THA was higher if using a fixed pin than in pinless navigation for both leg length (98.2%, 54/55 to 50.0%, 21/42, p < 0.001) and offset (100.0%, 55/55 to 71.4%, 30/42, p < 0.001). Imageless navigation is a feasible method in intraoperative control of leg length and offset in minimally invasive THA. The use of pins fixed to the bone has a higher precision than pinless devices. This trial is registered with DRKS00000739.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6036845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60368452018-07-25 Accuracy of Leg Length and Offset Restoration in Femoral Pinless Navigation Compared to Navigation Using a Fixed Pin during Total Hip Arthroplasty Weber, Markus Thieme, Max Kaiser, Moritz Völlner, Florian Worlicek, Michael Craiovan, Benjamin Grifka, Joachim Renkawitz, Tobias Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Equalization of biomechanical differences is a major goal in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study we compared the accuracy of restoring leg length and offset using imageless navigation with an osseous fixed pin to a femoral pinless device in 97 minimally invasive THAs through an anterolateral approach in the lateral decubitus position. Leg length and offset differences were evaluated on magnification-corrected radiographs by a blinded observer. A postoperative mean difference of -0.9 mm (95% CI -2.8 mm to 1.1 mm, p = 0.38) between pinless navigation and navigation with a fixed pin was observed for leg length and that of -2.4 mm (95% CI -3.9 mm to -0.9 mm, p = 0.002) was observed for offset, respectively. The number of patients with a residual difference below 5 mm after THA was higher if using a fixed pin than in pinless navigation for both leg length (98.2%, 54/55 to 50.0%, 21/42, p < 0.001) and offset (100.0%, 55/55 to 71.4%, 30/42, p < 0.001). Imageless navigation is a feasible method in intraoperative control of leg length and offset in minimally invasive THA. The use of pins fixed to the bone has a higher precision than pinless devices. This trial is registered with DRKS00000739. Hindawi 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6036845/ /pubmed/30046589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1639840 Text en Copyright © 2018 Markus Weber et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Weber, Markus
Thieme, Max
Kaiser, Moritz
Völlner, Florian
Worlicek, Michael
Craiovan, Benjamin
Grifka, Joachim
Renkawitz, Tobias
Accuracy of Leg Length and Offset Restoration in Femoral Pinless Navigation Compared to Navigation Using a Fixed Pin during Total Hip Arthroplasty
title Accuracy of Leg Length and Offset Restoration in Femoral Pinless Navigation Compared to Navigation Using a Fixed Pin during Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full Accuracy of Leg Length and Offset Restoration in Femoral Pinless Navigation Compared to Navigation Using a Fixed Pin during Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Accuracy of Leg Length and Offset Restoration in Femoral Pinless Navigation Compared to Navigation Using a Fixed Pin during Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Leg Length and Offset Restoration in Femoral Pinless Navigation Compared to Navigation Using a Fixed Pin during Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_short Accuracy of Leg Length and Offset Restoration in Femoral Pinless Navigation Compared to Navigation Using a Fixed Pin during Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_sort accuracy of leg length and offset restoration in femoral pinless navigation compared to navigation using a fixed pin during total hip arthroplasty
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1639840
work_keys_str_mv AT webermarkus accuracyofleglengthandoffsetrestorationinfemoralpinlessnavigationcomparedtonavigationusingafixedpinduringtotalhiparthroplasty
AT thiememax accuracyofleglengthandoffsetrestorationinfemoralpinlessnavigationcomparedtonavigationusingafixedpinduringtotalhiparthroplasty
AT kaisermoritz accuracyofleglengthandoffsetrestorationinfemoralpinlessnavigationcomparedtonavigationusingafixedpinduringtotalhiparthroplasty
AT vollnerflorian accuracyofleglengthandoffsetrestorationinfemoralpinlessnavigationcomparedtonavigationusingafixedpinduringtotalhiparthroplasty
AT worlicekmichael accuracyofleglengthandoffsetrestorationinfemoralpinlessnavigationcomparedtonavigationusingafixedpinduringtotalhiparthroplasty
AT craiovanbenjamin accuracyofleglengthandoffsetrestorationinfemoralpinlessnavigationcomparedtonavigationusingafixedpinduringtotalhiparthroplasty
AT grifkajoachim accuracyofleglengthandoffsetrestorationinfemoralpinlessnavigationcomparedtonavigationusingafixedpinduringtotalhiparthroplasty
AT renkawitztobias accuracyofleglengthandoffsetrestorationinfemoralpinlessnavigationcomparedtonavigationusingafixedpinduringtotalhiparthroplasty