Cargando…
Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts
Historical GIS involves applying GIS to historical research. Using a unique method, I recovered historical tree survey information stored in bar chart figures of a 1956 publication. I converted PDF files to TIF files, which is a format for a GIS layer. I then employed GIS tools to measure lengths of...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002982 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5158 |
_version_ | 1783338285905477632 |
---|---|
author | Hanberry, Brice |
author_facet | Hanberry, Brice |
author_sort | Hanberry, Brice |
collection | PubMed |
description | Historical GIS involves applying GIS to historical research. Using a unique method, I recovered historical tree survey information stored in bar chart figures of a 1956 publication. I converted PDF files to TIF files, which is a format for a GIS layer. I then employed GIS tools to measure lengths of each bar in the TIF file and used a regression (R(2) = 97%) to convert bar lengths to numerical values of tree composition. I joined this information to a spatial GIS layer of Indiana, USA. To validate results, I compared predictions against an independent dataset and written summaries. I determined that historically (circa 1799 to 1846) in Indiana, oaks were 27% of all trees, beech was 25%, hickories and sugar maple were 7% each, and ash was 4.5%. Beech forests dominated (i.e., >24% of all trees) 44% of 8.9 million ha (i.e., where data were available in Indiana), oak forests dominated 29%, beech and oak forests dominated 4.5%, and oak savannas were in 6% of Indiana, resulting in beech and/or oak dominance in 84% of the state. This method may be valuable to reclaim information available in published figures, when associated raw data are not available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6037136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60371362018-07-12 Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts Hanberry, Brice PeerJ Biogeography Historical GIS involves applying GIS to historical research. Using a unique method, I recovered historical tree survey information stored in bar chart figures of a 1956 publication. I converted PDF files to TIF files, which is a format for a GIS layer. I then employed GIS tools to measure lengths of each bar in the TIF file and used a regression (R(2) = 97%) to convert bar lengths to numerical values of tree composition. I joined this information to a spatial GIS layer of Indiana, USA. To validate results, I compared predictions against an independent dataset and written summaries. I determined that historically (circa 1799 to 1846) in Indiana, oaks were 27% of all trees, beech was 25%, hickories and sugar maple were 7% each, and ash was 4.5%. Beech forests dominated (i.e., >24% of all trees) 44% of 8.9 million ha (i.e., where data were available in Indiana), oak forests dominated 29%, beech and oak forests dominated 4.5%, and oak savannas were in 6% of Indiana, resulting in beech and/or oak dominance in 84% of the state. This method may be valuable to reclaim information available in published figures, when associated raw data are not available. PeerJ Inc. 2018-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6037136/ /pubmed/30002982 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5158 Text en ©2018 Hanberry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Biogeography Hanberry, Brice Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts |
title | Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts |
title_full | Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts |
title_fullStr | Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts |
title_full_unstemmed | Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts |
title_short | Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts |
title_sort | revisiting historical beech and oak forests in indiana using a gis method to recover information from bar charts |
topic | Biogeography |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002982 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanberrybrice revisitinghistoricalbeechandoakforestsinindianausingagismethodtorecoverinformationfrombarcharts |