Cargando…

Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts

Historical GIS involves applying GIS to historical research. Using a unique method, I recovered historical tree survey information stored in bar chart figures of a 1956 publication. I converted PDF files to TIF files, which is a format for a GIS layer. I then employed GIS tools to measure lengths of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hanberry, Brice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002982
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5158
_version_ 1783338285905477632
author Hanberry, Brice
author_facet Hanberry, Brice
author_sort Hanberry, Brice
collection PubMed
description Historical GIS involves applying GIS to historical research. Using a unique method, I recovered historical tree survey information stored in bar chart figures of a 1956 publication. I converted PDF files to TIF files, which is a format for a GIS layer. I then employed GIS tools to measure lengths of each bar in the TIF file and used a regression (R(2) = 97%) to convert bar lengths to numerical values of tree composition. I joined this information to a spatial GIS layer of Indiana, USA. To validate results, I compared predictions against an independent dataset and written summaries. I determined that historically (circa 1799 to 1846) in Indiana, oaks were 27% of all trees, beech was 25%, hickories and sugar maple were 7% each, and ash was 4.5%. Beech forests dominated (i.e., >24% of all trees) 44% of 8.9 million ha (i.e., where data were available in Indiana), oak forests dominated 29%, beech and oak forests dominated 4.5%, and oak savannas were in 6% of Indiana, resulting in beech and/or oak dominance in 84% of the state. This method may be valuable to reclaim information available in published figures, when associated raw data are not available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6037136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60371362018-07-12 Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts Hanberry, Brice PeerJ Biogeography Historical GIS involves applying GIS to historical research. Using a unique method, I recovered historical tree survey information stored in bar chart figures of a 1956 publication. I converted PDF files to TIF files, which is a format for a GIS layer. I then employed GIS tools to measure lengths of each bar in the TIF file and used a regression (R(2) = 97%) to convert bar lengths to numerical values of tree composition. I joined this information to a spatial GIS layer of Indiana, USA. To validate results, I compared predictions against an independent dataset and written summaries. I determined that historically (circa 1799 to 1846) in Indiana, oaks were 27% of all trees, beech was 25%, hickories and sugar maple were 7% each, and ash was 4.5%. Beech forests dominated (i.e., >24% of all trees) 44% of 8.9 million ha (i.e., where data were available in Indiana), oak forests dominated 29%, beech and oak forests dominated 4.5%, and oak savannas were in 6% of Indiana, resulting in beech and/or oak dominance in 84% of the state. This method may be valuable to reclaim information available in published figures, when associated raw data are not available. PeerJ Inc. 2018-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6037136/ /pubmed/30002982 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5158 Text en ©2018 Hanberry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biogeography
Hanberry, Brice
Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts
title Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts
title_full Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts
title_fullStr Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts
title_short Revisiting historical beech and oak forests in Indiana using a GIS method to recover information from bar charts
title_sort revisiting historical beech and oak forests in indiana using a gis method to recover information from bar charts
topic Biogeography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002982
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5158
work_keys_str_mv AT hanberrybrice revisitinghistoricalbeechandoakforestsinindianausingagismethodtorecoverinformationfrombarcharts