Cargando…

Exposure to Upper Arm Elevation During Work Compared to Leisure Among 12 Different Occupations Measured with Triaxial Accelerometers

Regarding prevention of neck and shoulder pain (NSP), unsupported arm elevation is one factor that should be taken into account when performing work risk assessment. Triaxial accelerometers can be used to measure arm elevation over several days but it is not possible to differentiate between support...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palm, Peter, Gupta, Nidhi, Forsman, Mikael, Skotte, Jørgen, Nordquist, Tobias, Holtermann, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy037
_version_ 1783338295427596288
author Palm, Peter
Gupta, Nidhi
Forsman, Mikael
Skotte, Jørgen
Nordquist, Tobias
Holtermann, Andreas
author_facet Palm, Peter
Gupta, Nidhi
Forsman, Mikael
Skotte, Jørgen
Nordquist, Tobias
Holtermann, Andreas
author_sort Palm, Peter
collection PubMed
description Regarding prevention of neck and shoulder pain (NSP), unsupported arm elevation is one factor that should be taken into account when performing work risk assessment. Triaxial accelerometers can be used to measure arm elevation over several days but it is not possible to differentiate between supported and unsupported arm elevation from accelerometers only. Supported arm elevation is more likely to exist during sitting than standing. The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of whole workday measurements of arm elevation with accelerometers to assess potentially harmful work exposure of arm elevation, by comparing arm elevation at work with arm elevation during leisure, in a population with diverse work tasks, and to assess how the exposure parameters were modified when upper arm elevation during sitting time was excluded. The participants, 197 workers belonging to 12 occupational groups with diverse work tasks, wore triaxial accelerometers on the dominant arm, hip, and back for 1–4 days to measure arm elevation and periods of sitting. None of the groups were found to have higher exposure to arm elevation during work compared to leisure. Even though some occupations where known to have work tasks that forced them to work with elevated arms to a large extent. A high proportion of arm elevation derived from sitting time, especially so during leisure. When arm elevation during sitting time was excluded from the analysis, arm elevation was significantly higher at work than during leisure among construction workers, garbage collectors, manufacturing workers, and domestic cleaners. Together this illustrates that it is not suitable to use whole workday measurments of arm elevation with accelerometer as a sole information source when assessing the risk for NSP due to arm elevation. Information on body posture can provide relevant contextual information in exposure assessments when it is known that the potential harmful exposure is performed in standing or walking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6037214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60372142018-07-12 Exposure to Upper Arm Elevation During Work Compared to Leisure Among 12 Different Occupations Measured with Triaxial Accelerometers Palm, Peter Gupta, Nidhi Forsman, Mikael Skotte, Jørgen Nordquist, Tobias Holtermann, Andreas Ann Work Expo Health Original Articles Regarding prevention of neck and shoulder pain (NSP), unsupported arm elevation is one factor that should be taken into account when performing work risk assessment. Triaxial accelerometers can be used to measure arm elevation over several days but it is not possible to differentiate between supported and unsupported arm elevation from accelerometers only. Supported arm elevation is more likely to exist during sitting than standing. The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of whole workday measurements of arm elevation with accelerometers to assess potentially harmful work exposure of arm elevation, by comparing arm elevation at work with arm elevation during leisure, in a population with diverse work tasks, and to assess how the exposure parameters were modified when upper arm elevation during sitting time was excluded. The participants, 197 workers belonging to 12 occupational groups with diverse work tasks, wore triaxial accelerometers on the dominant arm, hip, and back for 1–4 days to measure arm elevation and periods of sitting. None of the groups were found to have higher exposure to arm elevation during work compared to leisure. Even though some occupations where known to have work tasks that forced them to work with elevated arms to a large extent. A high proportion of arm elevation derived from sitting time, especially so during leisure. When arm elevation during sitting time was excluded from the analysis, arm elevation was significantly higher at work than during leisure among construction workers, garbage collectors, manufacturing workers, and domestic cleaners. Together this illustrates that it is not suitable to use whole workday measurments of arm elevation with accelerometer as a sole information source when assessing the risk for NSP due to arm elevation. Information on body posture can provide relevant contextual information in exposure assessments when it is known that the potential harmful exposure is performed in standing or walking. Oxford University Press 2018-07 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6037214/ /pubmed/29945157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy037 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Palm, Peter
Gupta, Nidhi
Forsman, Mikael
Skotte, Jørgen
Nordquist, Tobias
Holtermann, Andreas
Exposure to Upper Arm Elevation During Work Compared to Leisure Among 12 Different Occupations Measured with Triaxial Accelerometers
title Exposure to Upper Arm Elevation During Work Compared to Leisure Among 12 Different Occupations Measured with Triaxial Accelerometers
title_full Exposure to Upper Arm Elevation During Work Compared to Leisure Among 12 Different Occupations Measured with Triaxial Accelerometers
title_fullStr Exposure to Upper Arm Elevation During Work Compared to Leisure Among 12 Different Occupations Measured with Triaxial Accelerometers
title_full_unstemmed Exposure to Upper Arm Elevation During Work Compared to Leisure Among 12 Different Occupations Measured with Triaxial Accelerometers
title_short Exposure to Upper Arm Elevation During Work Compared to Leisure Among 12 Different Occupations Measured with Triaxial Accelerometers
title_sort exposure to upper arm elevation during work compared to leisure among 12 different occupations measured with triaxial accelerometers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy037
work_keys_str_mv AT palmpeter exposuretoupperarmelevationduringworkcomparedtoleisureamong12differentoccupationsmeasuredwithtriaxialaccelerometers
AT guptanidhi exposuretoupperarmelevationduringworkcomparedtoleisureamong12differentoccupationsmeasuredwithtriaxialaccelerometers
AT forsmanmikael exposuretoupperarmelevationduringworkcomparedtoleisureamong12differentoccupationsmeasuredwithtriaxialaccelerometers
AT skottejørgen exposuretoupperarmelevationduringworkcomparedtoleisureamong12differentoccupationsmeasuredwithtriaxialaccelerometers
AT nordquisttobias exposuretoupperarmelevationduringworkcomparedtoleisureamong12differentoccupationsmeasuredwithtriaxialaccelerometers
AT holtermannandreas exposuretoupperarmelevationduringworkcomparedtoleisureamong12differentoccupationsmeasuredwithtriaxialaccelerometers