Cargando…

Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods

Background: Epidemiological evidence on the social determinants of health inequity is well-advanced, but considerably less attention has been given to evaluating the impact of public policies addressing those social determinants. Methodological challenges to produce evidence on policy outcomes prese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Janice, Schram, Ashley, Riley, Emily, Harris, Patrick, Baum, Fran, Fisher, Matt, Freeman, Toby, Friel, Sharon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996578
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.04
_version_ 1783338338812428288
author Lee, Janice
Schram, Ashley
Riley, Emily
Harris, Patrick
Baum, Fran
Fisher, Matt
Freeman, Toby
Friel, Sharon
author_facet Lee, Janice
Schram, Ashley
Riley, Emily
Harris, Patrick
Baum, Fran
Fisher, Matt
Freeman, Toby
Friel, Sharon
author_sort Lee, Janice
collection PubMed
description Background: Epidemiological evidence on the social determinants of health inequity is well-advanced, but considerably less attention has been given to evaluating the impact of public policies addressing those social determinants. Methodological challenges to produce evidence on policy outcomes present a significant barrier to mobilising policy actions for health equities. This review aims to examine methodological approaches to policy evaluation of health equity outcomes and identify promising approaches for future research. Methods: We conducted a systematic narrative review of literature critically evaluating policy impact on health equity, synthesizing information on the methodological approaches used. We searched and screened records from five electronic databases, using pre-defined protocols resulting in a total of 50 studies included for review. We coded the studies according to (1) type of policy analysed; (2) research design; (3) analytical techniques; (4) health outcomes; and (5) equity dimensions evaluated. Results: We found a growing number of a wide range of policies being evaluated for health equity outcomes using a variety of research designs. The majority of studies employed an observational research design, most of which were cross-sectional, however, other approaches included experimental designs, simulation modelling, and meta-analysis. Regression techniques dominated the analytical approaches, although a number of novel techniques were used which may offer advantages over traditional regression analysis for the study of distributional impacts of policy. Few studies made intra-national or cross-national comparisons or collected primary data. Despite longstanding challenges of attribution in policy outcome evaluation, the majority of the studies attributed change in physical or mental health outcomes to the policy being evaluated. Conclusion: Our review provides an overview of methodological approaches to health equity policy outcome evaluation, demonstrating what is most commonplace and opportunities from novel approaches. We found the number of studies evaluating the impacts of public policies on health equity are on the rise, but this area of policy evaluation still requires more attention given growing inequities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6037500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60375002018-07-12 Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods Lee, Janice Schram, Ashley Riley, Emily Harris, Patrick Baum, Fran Fisher, Matt Freeman, Toby Friel, Sharon Int J Health Policy Manag Review Article Background: Epidemiological evidence on the social determinants of health inequity is well-advanced, but considerably less attention has been given to evaluating the impact of public policies addressing those social determinants. Methodological challenges to produce evidence on policy outcomes present a significant barrier to mobilising policy actions for health equities. This review aims to examine methodological approaches to policy evaluation of health equity outcomes and identify promising approaches for future research. Methods: We conducted a systematic narrative review of literature critically evaluating policy impact on health equity, synthesizing information on the methodological approaches used. We searched and screened records from five electronic databases, using pre-defined protocols resulting in a total of 50 studies included for review. We coded the studies according to (1) type of policy analysed; (2) research design; (3) analytical techniques; (4) health outcomes; and (5) equity dimensions evaluated. Results: We found a growing number of a wide range of policies being evaluated for health equity outcomes using a variety of research designs. The majority of studies employed an observational research design, most of which were cross-sectional, however, other approaches included experimental designs, simulation modelling, and meta-analysis. Regression techniques dominated the analytical approaches, although a number of novel techniques were used which may offer advantages over traditional regression analysis for the study of distributional impacts of policy. Few studies made intra-national or cross-national comparisons or collected primary data. Despite longstanding challenges of attribution in policy outcome evaluation, the majority of the studies attributed change in physical or mental health outcomes to the policy being evaluated. Conclusion: Our review provides an overview of methodological approaches to health equity policy outcome evaluation, demonstrating what is most commonplace and opportunities from novel approaches. We found the number of studies evaluating the impacts of public policies on health equity are on the rise, but this area of policy evaluation still requires more attention given growing inequities. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6037500/ /pubmed/29996578 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.04 Text en © 2018 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Lee, Janice
Schram, Ashley
Riley, Emily
Harris, Patrick
Baum, Fran
Fisher, Matt
Freeman, Toby
Friel, Sharon
Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods
title Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods
title_full Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods
title_fullStr Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods
title_full_unstemmed Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods
title_short Addressing Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Global Review of Policy Outcome Evaluation Methods
title_sort addressing health equity through action on the social determinants of health: a global review of policy outcome evaluation methods
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996578
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.04
work_keys_str_mv AT leejanice addressinghealthequitythroughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealthaglobalreviewofpolicyoutcomeevaluationmethods
AT schramashley addressinghealthequitythroughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealthaglobalreviewofpolicyoutcomeevaluationmethods
AT rileyemily addressinghealthequitythroughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealthaglobalreviewofpolicyoutcomeevaluationmethods
AT harrispatrick addressinghealthequitythroughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealthaglobalreviewofpolicyoutcomeevaluationmethods
AT baumfran addressinghealthequitythroughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealthaglobalreviewofpolicyoutcomeevaluationmethods
AT fishermatt addressinghealthequitythroughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealthaglobalreviewofpolicyoutcomeevaluationmethods
AT freemantoby addressinghealthequitythroughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealthaglobalreviewofpolicyoutcomeevaluationmethods
AT frielsharon addressinghealthequitythroughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealthaglobalreviewofpolicyoutcomeevaluationmethods