Cargando…

Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation

Background: Kenya introduced a free maternity policy in 2013 to address the cost barrier associated with accessing maternal health services. We carried out a mixed methods process evaluation of the policy to examine the extent to which the policy had been implemented according to design, and positiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tama, Eric, Molyneux, Sassy, Waweru, Evelyn, Tsofa, Benjamin, Chuma, Jane, Barasa, Edwine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996580
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135
_version_ 1783338339755098112
author Tama, Eric
Molyneux, Sassy
Waweru, Evelyn
Tsofa, Benjamin
Chuma, Jane
Barasa, Edwine
author_facet Tama, Eric
Molyneux, Sassy
Waweru, Evelyn
Tsofa, Benjamin
Chuma, Jane
Barasa, Edwine
author_sort Tama, Eric
collection PubMed
description Background: Kenya introduced a free maternity policy in 2013 to address the cost barrier associated with accessing maternal health services. We carried out a mixed methods process evaluation of the policy to examine the extent to which the policy had been implemented according to design, and positive experiences and challenges encountered during implementation. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study in 3 purposely selected counties in Kenya. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) with policy-makers at the national level, health managers at the county level, and frontline staff at the health facility level (n=60), focus group discussions (FGDs) with community representatives (n=10), facility records, and document reviews. We analysed the data using a framework approach. Results: Rapid implementation led to inadequate stakeholder engagement and confusion about the policy. While the policy was meant to cover antenatal visits, deliveries, and post-natal visits, in practice the policy only covered deliveries. While the policy led to a rapid increase in facility deliveries, this was not matched by an increase in health facility capacity and hence compromised quality of care. The policy led to an improvement in the level of revenues for facilities. However, in all three counties, reimbursements were not made on time. The policy did not have a system of verifying health facility reports on utilization of services. Conclusion: The Kenyan Ministry of Health (MoH) should develop a formal policy on the free maternity services, and provide clear guidelines on its content and implementation arrangements, engage with and effectively communicate the policy to stakeholders, ensure timeliness of payment disbursement to healthcare facilities, and introduce a mechanism for verifying utilization reports prepared by healthcare providers. User fee removal policies such as free maternity programmes should be accompanied by supply side capacity strengthening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6037504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60375042018-07-12 Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Tama, Eric Molyneux, Sassy Waweru, Evelyn Tsofa, Benjamin Chuma, Jane Barasa, Edwine Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: Kenya introduced a free maternity policy in 2013 to address the cost barrier associated with accessing maternal health services. We carried out a mixed methods process evaluation of the policy to examine the extent to which the policy had been implemented according to design, and positive experiences and challenges encountered during implementation. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study in 3 purposely selected counties in Kenya. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) with policy-makers at the national level, health managers at the county level, and frontline staff at the health facility level (n=60), focus group discussions (FGDs) with community representatives (n=10), facility records, and document reviews. We analysed the data using a framework approach. Results: Rapid implementation led to inadequate stakeholder engagement and confusion about the policy. While the policy was meant to cover antenatal visits, deliveries, and post-natal visits, in practice the policy only covered deliveries. While the policy led to a rapid increase in facility deliveries, this was not matched by an increase in health facility capacity and hence compromised quality of care. The policy led to an improvement in the level of revenues for facilities. However, in all three counties, reimbursements were not made on time. The policy did not have a system of verifying health facility reports on utilization of services. Conclusion: The Kenyan Ministry of Health (MoH) should develop a formal policy on the free maternity services, and provide clear guidelines on its content and implementation arrangements, engage with and effectively communicate the policy to stakeholders, ensure timeliness of payment disbursement to healthcare facilities, and introduce a mechanism for verifying utilization reports prepared by healthcare providers. User fee removal policies such as free maternity programmes should be accompanied by supply side capacity strengthening. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2017-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6037504/ /pubmed/29996580 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135 Text en © 2018 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tama, Eric
Molyneux, Sassy
Waweru, Evelyn
Tsofa, Benjamin
Chuma, Jane
Barasa, Edwine
Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
title Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
title_full Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
title_fullStr Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
title_short Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
title_sort examining the implementation of the free maternity services policy in kenya: a mixed methods process evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996580
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135
work_keys_str_mv AT tamaeric examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT molyneuxsassy examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT waweruevelyn examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT tsofabenjamin examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT chumajane examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation
AT barasaedwine examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation