Cargando…
Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
Background: Kenya introduced a free maternity policy in 2013 to address the cost barrier associated with accessing maternal health services. We carried out a mixed methods process evaluation of the policy to examine the extent to which the policy had been implemented according to design, and positiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996580 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135 |
_version_ | 1783338339755098112 |
---|---|
author | Tama, Eric Molyneux, Sassy Waweru, Evelyn Tsofa, Benjamin Chuma, Jane Barasa, Edwine |
author_facet | Tama, Eric Molyneux, Sassy Waweru, Evelyn Tsofa, Benjamin Chuma, Jane Barasa, Edwine |
author_sort | Tama, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Kenya introduced a free maternity policy in 2013 to address the cost barrier associated with accessing maternal health services. We carried out a mixed methods process evaluation of the policy to examine the extent to which the policy had been implemented according to design, and positive experiences and challenges encountered during implementation. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study in 3 purposely selected counties in Kenya. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) with policy-makers at the national level, health managers at the county level, and frontline staff at the health facility level (n=60), focus group discussions (FGDs) with community representatives (n=10), facility records, and document reviews. We analysed the data using a framework approach. Results: Rapid implementation led to inadequate stakeholder engagement and confusion about the policy. While the policy was meant to cover antenatal visits, deliveries, and post-natal visits, in practice the policy only covered deliveries. While the policy led to a rapid increase in facility deliveries, this was not matched by an increase in health facility capacity and hence compromised quality of care. The policy led to an improvement in the level of revenues for facilities. However, in all three counties, reimbursements were not made on time. The policy did not have a system of verifying health facility reports on utilization of services. Conclusion: The Kenyan Ministry of Health (MoH) should develop a formal policy on the free maternity services, and provide clear guidelines on its content and implementation arrangements, engage with and effectively communicate the policy to stakeholders, ensure timeliness of payment disbursement to healthcare facilities, and introduce a mechanism for verifying utilization reports prepared by healthcare providers. User fee removal policies such as free maternity programmes should be accompanied by supply side capacity strengthening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6037504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60375042018-07-12 Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Tama, Eric Molyneux, Sassy Waweru, Evelyn Tsofa, Benjamin Chuma, Jane Barasa, Edwine Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: Kenya introduced a free maternity policy in 2013 to address the cost barrier associated with accessing maternal health services. We carried out a mixed methods process evaluation of the policy to examine the extent to which the policy had been implemented according to design, and positive experiences and challenges encountered during implementation. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study in 3 purposely selected counties in Kenya. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (IDIs) with policy-makers at the national level, health managers at the county level, and frontline staff at the health facility level (n=60), focus group discussions (FGDs) with community representatives (n=10), facility records, and document reviews. We analysed the data using a framework approach. Results: Rapid implementation led to inadequate stakeholder engagement and confusion about the policy. While the policy was meant to cover antenatal visits, deliveries, and post-natal visits, in practice the policy only covered deliveries. While the policy led to a rapid increase in facility deliveries, this was not matched by an increase in health facility capacity and hence compromised quality of care. The policy led to an improvement in the level of revenues for facilities. However, in all three counties, reimbursements were not made on time. The policy did not have a system of verifying health facility reports on utilization of services. Conclusion: The Kenyan Ministry of Health (MoH) should develop a formal policy on the free maternity services, and provide clear guidelines on its content and implementation arrangements, engage with and effectively communicate the policy to stakeholders, ensure timeliness of payment disbursement to healthcare facilities, and introduce a mechanism for verifying utilization reports prepared by healthcare providers. User fee removal policies such as free maternity programmes should be accompanied by supply side capacity strengthening. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2017-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6037504/ /pubmed/29996580 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135 Text en © 2018 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tama, Eric Molyneux, Sassy Waweru, Evelyn Tsofa, Benjamin Chuma, Jane Barasa, Edwine Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation |
title | Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation |
title_full | Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation |
title_short | Examining the Implementation of the Free Maternity Services Policy in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation |
title_sort | examining the implementation of the free maternity services policy in kenya: a mixed methods process evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996580 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tamaeric examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT molyneuxsassy examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT waweruevelyn examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT tsofabenjamin examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT chumajane examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation AT barasaedwine examiningtheimplementationofthefreematernityservicespolicyinkenyaamixedmethodsprocessevaluation |