Cargando…

Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?

Radiomics is an objective method for extracting quantitative information from medical images. However, in radiomics, standardization, overfitting, and generalization are major challenges to be overcome. Test–retest experiments can be used to select robust radiomic features that have minimal variatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Timmeren, Janna E., Leijenaar, Ralph T.H., van Elmpt, Wouter, Wang, Jiazhou, Zhang, Zhen, Dekker, André, Lambin, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Grapho Publications, LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042967
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00208
_version_ 1783338412703481856
author van Timmeren, Janna E.
Leijenaar, Ralph T.H.
van Elmpt, Wouter
Wang, Jiazhou
Zhang, Zhen
Dekker, André
Lambin, Philippe
author_facet van Timmeren, Janna E.
Leijenaar, Ralph T.H.
van Elmpt, Wouter
Wang, Jiazhou
Zhang, Zhen
Dekker, André
Lambin, Philippe
author_sort van Timmeren, Janna E.
collection PubMed
description Radiomics is an objective method for extracting quantitative information from medical images. However, in radiomics, standardization, overfitting, and generalization are major challenges to be overcome. Test–retest experiments can be used to select robust radiomic features that have minimal variation. Currently, it is unknown whether they should be identified for each disease (disease specific) or are only imaging device-specific (computed tomography [CT]-specific). Here, we performed a test–retest analysis on CT scans of 40 patients with rectal cancer in a clinical setting. Correlation between radiomic features was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). In total, only 9/542 features have a CCC > 0.85. Furthermore, results were compared with the test–retest results on CT scans of 27 patients with lung cancer with a 15-minute interval. Results show that 446/542 features have a higher CCC for the test–retest analysis of the data set of patients with lung cancer than for patients with rectal cancer. The importance of controlling factors such as scanners, imaging protocol, reconstruction methods, and time points in a radiomics analysis is shown. Moreover, the results imply that test–retest analyses should be performed before each radiomics study. More research is required to independently evaluate the effect of each factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6037932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Grapho Publications, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60379322018-07-24 Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? van Timmeren, Janna E. Leijenaar, Ralph T.H. van Elmpt, Wouter Wang, Jiazhou Zhang, Zhen Dekker, André Lambin, Philippe Tomography Research Articles Radiomics is an objective method for extracting quantitative information from medical images. However, in radiomics, standardization, overfitting, and generalization are major challenges to be overcome. Test–retest experiments can be used to select robust radiomic features that have minimal variation. Currently, it is unknown whether they should be identified for each disease (disease specific) or are only imaging device-specific (computed tomography [CT]-specific). Here, we performed a test–retest analysis on CT scans of 40 patients with rectal cancer in a clinical setting. Correlation between radiomic features was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). In total, only 9/542 features have a CCC > 0.85. Furthermore, results were compared with the test–retest results on CT scans of 27 patients with lung cancer with a 15-minute interval. Results show that 446/542 features have a higher CCC for the test–retest analysis of the data set of patients with lung cancer than for patients with rectal cancer. The importance of controlling factors such as scanners, imaging protocol, reconstruction methods, and time points in a radiomics analysis is shown. Moreover, the results imply that test–retest analyses should be performed before each radiomics study. More research is required to independently evaluate the effect of each factor. Grapho Publications, LLC 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6037932/ /pubmed/30042967 http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00208 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
van Timmeren, Janna E.
Leijenaar, Ralph T.H.
van Elmpt, Wouter
Wang, Jiazhou
Zhang, Zhen
Dekker, André
Lambin, Philippe
Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?
title Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?
title_full Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?
title_fullStr Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?
title_full_unstemmed Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?
title_short Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?
title_sort test–retest data for radiomics feature stability analysis: generalizable or study-specific?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042967
http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00208
work_keys_str_mv AT vantimmerenjannae testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific
AT leijenaarralphth testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific
AT vanelmptwouter testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific
AT wangjiazhou testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific
AT zhangzhen testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific
AT dekkerandre testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific
AT lambinphilippe testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific