Cargando…
Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?
Radiomics is an objective method for extracting quantitative information from medical images. However, in radiomics, standardization, overfitting, and generalization are major challenges to be overcome. Test–retest experiments can be used to select robust radiomic features that have minimal variatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Grapho Publications, LLC
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042967 http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00208 |
_version_ | 1783338412703481856 |
---|---|
author | van Timmeren, Janna E. Leijenaar, Ralph T.H. van Elmpt, Wouter Wang, Jiazhou Zhang, Zhen Dekker, André Lambin, Philippe |
author_facet | van Timmeren, Janna E. Leijenaar, Ralph T.H. van Elmpt, Wouter Wang, Jiazhou Zhang, Zhen Dekker, André Lambin, Philippe |
author_sort | van Timmeren, Janna E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radiomics is an objective method for extracting quantitative information from medical images. However, in radiomics, standardization, overfitting, and generalization are major challenges to be overcome. Test–retest experiments can be used to select robust radiomic features that have minimal variation. Currently, it is unknown whether they should be identified for each disease (disease specific) or are only imaging device-specific (computed tomography [CT]-specific). Here, we performed a test–retest analysis on CT scans of 40 patients with rectal cancer in a clinical setting. Correlation between radiomic features was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). In total, only 9/542 features have a CCC > 0.85. Furthermore, results were compared with the test–retest results on CT scans of 27 patients with lung cancer with a 15-minute interval. Results show that 446/542 features have a higher CCC for the test–retest analysis of the data set of patients with lung cancer than for patients with rectal cancer. The importance of controlling factors such as scanners, imaging protocol, reconstruction methods, and time points in a radiomics analysis is shown. Moreover, the results imply that test–retest analyses should be performed before each radiomics study. More research is required to independently evaluate the effect of each factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6037932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Grapho Publications, LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60379322018-07-24 Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? van Timmeren, Janna E. Leijenaar, Ralph T.H. van Elmpt, Wouter Wang, Jiazhou Zhang, Zhen Dekker, André Lambin, Philippe Tomography Research Articles Radiomics is an objective method for extracting quantitative information from medical images. However, in radiomics, standardization, overfitting, and generalization are major challenges to be overcome. Test–retest experiments can be used to select robust radiomic features that have minimal variation. Currently, it is unknown whether they should be identified for each disease (disease specific) or are only imaging device-specific (computed tomography [CT]-specific). Here, we performed a test–retest analysis on CT scans of 40 patients with rectal cancer in a clinical setting. Correlation between radiomic features was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). In total, only 9/542 features have a CCC > 0.85. Furthermore, results were compared with the test–retest results on CT scans of 27 patients with lung cancer with a 15-minute interval. Results show that 446/542 features have a higher CCC for the test–retest analysis of the data set of patients with lung cancer than for patients with rectal cancer. The importance of controlling factors such as scanners, imaging protocol, reconstruction methods, and time points in a radiomics analysis is shown. Moreover, the results imply that test–retest analyses should be performed before each radiomics study. More research is required to independently evaluate the effect of each factor. Grapho Publications, LLC 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6037932/ /pubmed/30042967 http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00208 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles van Timmeren, Janna E. Leijenaar, Ralph T.H. van Elmpt, Wouter Wang, Jiazhou Zhang, Zhen Dekker, André Lambin, Philippe Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? |
title | Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? |
title_full | Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? |
title_fullStr | Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? |
title_full_unstemmed | Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? |
title_short | Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? |
title_sort | test–retest data for radiomics feature stability analysis: generalizable or study-specific? |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6037932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042967 http://dx.doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2016.00208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vantimmerenjannae testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific AT leijenaarralphth testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific AT vanelmptwouter testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific AT wangjiazhou testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific AT zhangzhen testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific AT dekkerandre testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific AT lambinphilippe testretestdataforradiomicsfeaturestabilityanalysisgeneralizableorstudyspecific |