Cargando…

Correlation between circulating tumour DNA and metabolic tumour burden in metastatic melanoma patients

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) may serve as a measure of tumour burden and a useful tool for non-invasive monitoring of cancer. However, ctDNA is not always detectable in patients at time of diagnosis of metastatic disease. Therefore, there is a need to understand the correlation between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McEvoy, Ashleigh C., Warburton, Lydia, Al-Ogaili, Zeyad, Celliers, Liesl, Calapre, Leslie, Pereira, Michelle R., Khattak, Muhammad A., Meniawy, Tarek M., Millward, Michael, Ziman, Melanie, Gray, Elin S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29986670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4637-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) may serve as a measure of tumour burden and a useful tool for non-invasive monitoring of cancer. However, ctDNA is not always detectable in patients at time of diagnosis of metastatic disease. Therefore, there is a need to understand the correlation between ctDNA levels and the patients’ overall metabolic tumour burden (MTB). METHODS: Thirty-two treatment naïve metastatic melanoma patients were included in the study. MTB and metabolic tumour volume (MTV) was measured by 18F-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT). Plasma ctDNA was quantified using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). RESULTS: CtDNA was detected in 23 of 32 patients. Overall, a significant correlation was observed between ctDNA levels and MTB (p < 0.001). CtDNA was not detectable in patients with an MTB of ≤10, defining this value as the lower limit of tumour burden that can be detected through ctDNA analysis by ddPCR. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that ctDNA levels measured by ddPCR correlate with MTB in treatment naïve metastatic melanoma patients and observed a limit in tumour size for which ctDNA cannot be detected in blood. Nevertheless, our findings support the use of ctDNA as a non-invasive complementary modality to functional imaging for monitoring tumour burden. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4637-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.