Cargando…

Variability in contact precautions to control the nosocomial spread of multi-drug resistant organisms in the endemic setting: a multinational cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Definitions and practices regarding use of contact precautions and isolation to prevent the spread of gram-positive and gram-negative multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are not uniform. METHODS: We conducted an on-site survey during the European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gysin, Danielle Vuichard, Cookson, Barry, Saenz, Henri, Dettenkofer, Markus, Widmer, Andreas F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0366-5
_version_ 1783338460492333056
author Gysin, Danielle Vuichard
Cookson, Barry
Saenz, Henri
Dettenkofer, Markus
Widmer, Andreas F.
author_facet Gysin, Danielle Vuichard
Cookson, Barry
Saenz, Henri
Dettenkofer, Markus
Widmer, Andreas F.
author_sort Gysin, Danielle Vuichard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Definitions and practices regarding use of contact precautions and isolation to prevent the spread of gram-positive and gram-negative multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are not uniform. METHODS: We conducted an on-site survey during the European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2014 to assess specific details on contact precaution and implementation barriers. RESULTS: Attendants from 32 European (EU) and 24 non-EU countries participated (n = 213). In EU-respondents adherence to contact precautions and isolation was high for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and MDR A. baumannii (84.7, 85.7, and 80%, respectively) whereas only 68% of EU-respondents considered any contact precaution measures for extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing non-E. coli. Between 30 and 45% of all EU and non-EU respondents did not require health-care workers (HCW) to wear gowns and gloves at all times when entering the room of a patient in contact isolation. Between 10 and 20% of respondents did not consider any rooming specifications or isolation for gram-positive MDRO and up to 30% of respondents abstain from such interventions in gram-negative MDRO, especially non-E. coli ESBL. Understaffing and lack of sufficient isolation rooms were the most commonly encountered barriers amongst EU and non-EU respondents. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of contact precautions and isolation is difficult to assess due to great variation in components of the specific measures and mixed levels of implementation. The lack of uniform positive effects of contact isolation to prevent transmission may be explained by the variability of interpretation of this term. Indications for contact isolation require a global definition and further sound studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-018-0366-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6038251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60382512018-07-12 Variability in contact precautions to control the nosocomial spread of multi-drug resistant organisms in the endemic setting: a multinational cross-sectional survey Gysin, Danielle Vuichard Cookson, Barry Saenz, Henri Dettenkofer, Markus Widmer, Andreas F. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Definitions and practices regarding use of contact precautions and isolation to prevent the spread of gram-positive and gram-negative multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are not uniform. METHODS: We conducted an on-site survey during the European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2014 to assess specific details on contact precaution and implementation barriers. RESULTS: Attendants from 32 European (EU) and 24 non-EU countries participated (n = 213). In EU-respondents adherence to contact precautions and isolation was high for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and MDR A. baumannii (84.7, 85.7, and 80%, respectively) whereas only 68% of EU-respondents considered any contact precaution measures for extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing non-E. coli. Between 30 and 45% of all EU and non-EU respondents did not require health-care workers (HCW) to wear gowns and gloves at all times when entering the room of a patient in contact isolation. Between 10 and 20% of respondents did not consider any rooming specifications or isolation for gram-positive MDRO and up to 30% of respondents abstain from such interventions in gram-negative MDRO, especially non-E. coli ESBL. Understaffing and lack of sufficient isolation rooms were the most commonly encountered barriers amongst EU and non-EU respondents. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of contact precautions and isolation is difficult to assess due to great variation in components of the specific measures and mixed levels of implementation. The lack of uniform positive effects of contact isolation to prevent transmission may be explained by the variability of interpretation of this term. Indications for contact isolation require a global definition and further sound studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-018-0366-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6038251/ /pubmed/30002821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0366-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gysin, Danielle Vuichard
Cookson, Barry
Saenz, Henri
Dettenkofer, Markus
Widmer, Andreas F.
Variability in contact precautions to control the nosocomial spread of multi-drug resistant organisms in the endemic setting: a multinational cross-sectional survey
title Variability in contact precautions to control the nosocomial spread of multi-drug resistant organisms in the endemic setting: a multinational cross-sectional survey
title_full Variability in contact precautions to control the nosocomial spread of multi-drug resistant organisms in the endemic setting: a multinational cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Variability in contact precautions to control the nosocomial spread of multi-drug resistant organisms in the endemic setting: a multinational cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Variability in contact precautions to control the nosocomial spread of multi-drug resistant organisms in the endemic setting: a multinational cross-sectional survey
title_short Variability in contact precautions to control the nosocomial spread of multi-drug resistant organisms in the endemic setting: a multinational cross-sectional survey
title_sort variability in contact precautions to control the nosocomial spread of multi-drug resistant organisms in the endemic setting: a multinational cross-sectional survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0366-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gysindaniellevuichard variabilityincontactprecautionstocontrolthenosocomialspreadofmultidrugresistantorganismsintheendemicsettingamultinationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT cooksonbarry variabilityincontactprecautionstocontrolthenosocomialspreadofmultidrugresistantorganismsintheendemicsettingamultinationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT saenzhenri variabilityincontactprecautionstocontrolthenosocomialspreadofmultidrugresistantorganismsintheendemicsettingamultinationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT dettenkofermarkus variabilityincontactprecautionstocontrolthenosocomialspreadofmultidrugresistantorganismsintheendemicsettingamultinationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT widmerandreasf variabilityincontactprecautionstocontrolthenosocomialspreadofmultidrugresistantorganismsintheendemicsettingamultinationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT variabilityincontactprecautionstocontrolthenosocomialspreadofmultidrugresistantorganismsintheendemicsettingamultinationalcrosssectionalsurvey