Cargando…

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond LASIK: a prospective observational cohort study

PURPOSE: Based on the assumption that high levels of intraocular pressure (IOP) during femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) may compromise the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), newer femtosecond platforms that operate without causing significant IOP elevation have been develo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katsanos, Andreas, Arranz-Marquez, Esther, Cañones, Rafael, Lauzirika, Gorka, Rodríguez-Perez, Isabel, Teus, Miguel A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013314
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S168033
_version_ 1783338582187966464
author Katsanos, Andreas
Arranz-Marquez, Esther
Cañones, Rafael
Lauzirika, Gorka
Rodríguez-Perez, Isabel
Teus, Miguel A
author_facet Katsanos, Andreas
Arranz-Marquez, Esther
Cañones, Rafael
Lauzirika, Gorka
Rodríguez-Perez, Isabel
Teus, Miguel A
author_sort Katsanos, Andreas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Based on the assumption that high levels of intraocular pressure (IOP) during femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) may compromise the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), newer femtosecond platforms that operate without causing significant IOP elevation have been developed in recent years. However, this assumption has not been adequately tested. The aim of the current study was to evaluate possible changes in RFNL thickness in nonglaucomatous myopic patients undergoing FS-LASIK using the 60 KHz IntraLase(®) device that significantly elevates the IOP for an appreciable period of time vs an advanced surface ablation technique (laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis, LASEK) that does not induce any IOP elevation. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, controlled cohort study. One randomly selected eye of 114 consecutive eligible patients was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were myopia up to -6.00 diopters and astigmatism up to -2.00 diopters. As clinically indicated, 50 patients underwent LASEK and 64 underwent FS-LASIK. The RNFL thickness was determined with a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography device preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively by the same masked observer. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative refractive error, age, or sex between the groups. Preoperatively, central corneal thickness was significantly lower in the LASEK group (529.1±36.1 vs 562.4±31.6 µm, P=0.001). For the LASEK group, there was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative RNFL thickness in the studied sectors (superior-temporal, temporal, inferior-temporal, average). For the FS-LASIK group, compared to preoperative RNFL measures, statistically significant thicker postoperative values were found for the average RNFL (mean difference: 0.67 µm, 0.7% increase, P=0.008) and the inferior-temporal sector (mean difference: 0.92 µm, 0.6% increase, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: LASIK with a femtosecond platform that induces high intraoperative IOP did not cause RNFL thinning. The observed differences between preoperative and postoperative values are below the axial resolution limit of optical coherence tomography devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6038866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60388662018-07-16 Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond LASIK: a prospective observational cohort study Katsanos, Andreas Arranz-Marquez, Esther Cañones, Rafael Lauzirika, Gorka Rodríguez-Perez, Isabel Teus, Miguel A Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Based on the assumption that high levels of intraocular pressure (IOP) during femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) may compromise the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), newer femtosecond platforms that operate without causing significant IOP elevation have been developed in recent years. However, this assumption has not been adequately tested. The aim of the current study was to evaluate possible changes in RFNL thickness in nonglaucomatous myopic patients undergoing FS-LASIK using the 60 KHz IntraLase(®) device that significantly elevates the IOP for an appreciable period of time vs an advanced surface ablation technique (laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis, LASEK) that does not induce any IOP elevation. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, controlled cohort study. One randomly selected eye of 114 consecutive eligible patients was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were myopia up to -6.00 diopters and astigmatism up to -2.00 diopters. As clinically indicated, 50 patients underwent LASEK and 64 underwent FS-LASIK. The RNFL thickness was determined with a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography device preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively by the same masked observer. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative refractive error, age, or sex between the groups. Preoperatively, central corneal thickness was significantly lower in the LASEK group (529.1±36.1 vs 562.4±31.6 µm, P=0.001). For the LASEK group, there was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative RNFL thickness in the studied sectors (superior-temporal, temporal, inferior-temporal, average). For the FS-LASIK group, compared to preoperative RNFL measures, statistically significant thicker postoperative values were found for the average RNFL (mean difference: 0.67 µm, 0.7% increase, P=0.008) and the inferior-temporal sector (mean difference: 0.92 µm, 0.6% increase, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: LASIK with a femtosecond platform that induces high intraoperative IOP did not cause RNFL thinning. The observed differences between preoperative and postoperative values are below the axial resolution limit of optical coherence tomography devices. Dove Medical Press 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6038866/ /pubmed/30013314 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S168033 Text en © 2018 Katsanos et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Katsanos, Andreas
Arranz-Marquez, Esther
Cañones, Rafael
Lauzirika, Gorka
Rodríguez-Perez, Isabel
Teus, Miguel A
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond LASIK: a prospective observational cohort study
title Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond LASIK: a prospective observational cohort study
title_full Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond LASIK: a prospective observational cohort study
title_fullStr Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond LASIK: a prospective observational cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond LASIK: a prospective observational cohort study
title_short Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond LASIK: a prospective observational cohort study
title_sort retinal nerve fiber layer thickness after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and femtosecond lasik: a prospective observational cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013314
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S168033
work_keys_str_mv AT katsanosandreas retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessafterlaserassistedsubepithelialkeratomileusisandfemtosecondlasikaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT arranzmarquezesther retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessafterlaserassistedsubepithelialkeratomileusisandfemtosecondlasikaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT canonesrafael retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessafterlaserassistedsubepithelialkeratomileusisandfemtosecondlasikaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT lauzirikagorka retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessafterlaserassistedsubepithelialkeratomileusisandfemtosecondlasikaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT rodriguezperezisabel retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessafterlaserassistedsubepithelialkeratomileusisandfemtosecondlasikaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy
AT teusmiguela retinalnervefiberlayerthicknessafterlaserassistedsubepithelialkeratomileusisandfemtosecondlasikaprospectiveobservationalcohortstudy