Cargando…

Macular edema resolution assessment with implantable dexamethasone in diabetic retinopathy (MERIT): a pilot study

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone implantation on the hard exudates (HEX) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). STUDY DESIGN: This was a nonrandomized open-label single-center prospective trial. METHODS: This study included 15 eyes of 11 subjects with DME. Ke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chhablani, Jay, Jhingan, Mahima, Goud, Abhilash, Vupparaboina, Kiran Kumar, Das, Taraprasad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013313
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S163681
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone implantation on the hard exudates (HEX) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). STUDY DESIGN: This was a nonrandomized open-label single-center prospective trial. METHODS: This study included 15 eyes of 11 subjects with DME. Key inclusion criteria were naïve eyes with DME with HEX within 3 mm of fovea with center-involving DME; central macular thickness (CMT) >250 μm at baseline; best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 20/400 and 20/40. Key exclusion criteria were previous intraocular surgery and history of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in past 4 months. The primary outcome measure was change in total HEX area at the macula (in mm(2)) measured by semiautomated algorithm. Secondary outcome measures were change in visual acuity, low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA), retinal sensitivity (RS) on macular microperimetry, and CMT. RESULTS: The total HEX area reduced from 1.5 mm(2) (±1.46 mm(2)) at baseline to 0.89 mm(2) (±1.062 mm(2)) at the final visit (p=0.185). The CMT improved significantly (p=0.03) from 488.67 μm (±240.66 μm) to 326.93 μm (±135.84 μm) at the final visit. Mean BCVA remained stable (p=0.95) (50.93±16.65 at baseline and 50.6±18.95 at final visit). The mean LCVA and RS showed insignificant improvement (p=0.31 and p=0.28, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our pilot study demonstrated an improving trend in reduction of total HEX area and other anatomical outcomes, with limited functional outcomes. Larger randomized studies with a larger sample size with a control group are warranted to establish management protocols for DME with significant subfoveal HEX.