Cargando…

A Comparison of 2D and 3D Kidney Absorbed Dose Measures in Patients Receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE

OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate and compare quantitative accuracy of kidney absorbed dose measures made from both 2D and 3D imaging in patients receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE (Lutate) for treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). METHODS: Patients receiving Lutate therapy underwent both whole body planar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willowson, Kathy P, Ryu, HyunJu, Jackson, Price, Singh, Anita, Eslick, Enid, Bailey, Dale L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29998144
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2018.26105.1182
_version_ 1783338599369932800
author Willowson, Kathy P
Ryu, HyunJu
Jackson, Price
Singh, Anita
Eslick, Enid
Bailey, Dale L
author_facet Willowson, Kathy P
Ryu, HyunJu
Jackson, Price
Singh, Anita
Eslick, Enid
Bailey, Dale L
author_sort Willowson, Kathy P
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate and compare quantitative accuracy of kidney absorbed dose measures made from both 2D and 3D imaging in patients receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE (Lutate) for treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). METHODS: Patients receiving Lutate therapy underwent both whole body planar imaging and SPECT/CT imaging over the kidneys at time points 0.5, 4, 24, and 96-120 hours after injection. Planar data were corrected for attenuation using transmission data, and were converted to units of absolute activity via two methods, using either a calibration standard in the field of view or relative to pre-voiding image total counts. Hand drawn regions of interest were used to generate time activity curves and kidney absorbed dose estimates in OLINDA-EXM. Fully quantitative SPECT data were generated using CT-derived corrections for both scatter and attenuation, before correction for dead time and application of a camera specific sensitivity factor to convert data to units of absolute activity. Volumes of interest were defined for kidney using the co-registered x-ray CT, before time activity curves and absorbed dose measures were generated in OLINDA-EXM, both with and without corrections made to the model for patient specific kidney volumes. Quantitative SPECT data were also used to derive dose maps through dose kernel convolution (DKC), which was treated as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 50 studies were analysed, corresponding to various cycles of treatment from 21 patients. Planar absorbed dose estimates were consistently higher than SPECT derived estimates by, on average, a factor of 3. CONCLUSION: Quantitative SPECT is considered the gold standard approach for organ specific dosimetry however often relies on in house software. As such planar methods for estimating absorbed dose are much more widely available, and in particular, are often the only source of reference in previously published data. For the case of Lutate dosimetry, planar measures may lead to a three-fold increase in measures of kidney absorbed dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6038968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60389682018-07-11 A Comparison of 2D and 3D Kidney Absorbed Dose Measures in Patients Receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE Willowson, Kathy P Ryu, HyunJu Jackson, Price Singh, Anita Eslick, Enid Bailey, Dale L Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol Original Article OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate and compare quantitative accuracy of kidney absorbed dose measures made from both 2D and 3D imaging in patients receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE (Lutate) for treatment of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). METHODS: Patients receiving Lutate therapy underwent both whole body planar imaging and SPECT/CT imaging over the kidneys at time points 0.5, 4, 24, and 96-120 hours after injection. Planar data were corrected for attenuation using transmission data, and were converted to units of absolute activity via two methods, using either a calibration standard in the field of view or relative to pre-voiding image total counts. Hand drawn regions of interest were used to generate time activity curves and kidney absorbed dose estimates in OLINDA-EXM. Fully quantitative SPECT data were generated using CT-derived corrections for both scatter and attenuation, before correction for dead time and application of a camera specific sensitivity factor to convert data to units of absolute activity. Volumes of interest were defined for kidney using the co-registered x-ray CT, before time activity curves and absorbed dose measures were generated in OLINDA-EXM, both with and without corrections made to the model for patient specific kidney volumes. Quantitative SPECT data were also used to derive dose maps through dose kernel convolution (DKC), which was treated as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 50 studies were analysed, corresponding to various cycles of treatment from 21 patients. Planar absorbed dose estimates were consistently higher than SPECT derived estimates by, on average, a factor of 3. CONCLUSION: Quantitative SPECT is considered the gold standard approach for organ specific dosimetry however often relies on in house software. As such planar methods for estimating absorbed dose are much more widely available, and in particular, are often the only source of reference in previously published data. For the case of Lutate dosimetry, planar measures may lead to a three-fold increase in measures of kidney absorbed dose. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6038968/ /pubmed/29998144 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2018.26105.1182 Text en © 2018 mums.ac.ir All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Willowson, Kathy P
Ryu, HyunJu
Jackson, Price
Singh, Anita
Eslick, Enid
Bailey, Dale L
A Comparison of 2D and 3D Kidney Absorbed Dose Measures in Patients Receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE
title A Comparison of 2D and 3D Kidney Absorbed Dose Measures in Patients Receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE
title_full A Comparison of 2D and 3D Kidney Absorbed Dose Measures in Patients Receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE
title_fullStr A Comparison of 2D and 3D Kidney Absorbed Dose Measures in Patients Receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of 2D and 3D Kidney Absorbed Dose Measures in Patients Receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE
title_short A Comparison of 2D and 3D Kidney Absorbed Dose Measures in Patients Receiving (177)Lu-DOTATATE
title_sort comparison of 2d and 3d kidney absorbed dose measures in patients receiving (177)lu-dotatate
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29998144
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2018.26105.1182
work_keys_str_mv AT willowsonkathyp acomparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT ryuhyunju acomparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT jacksonprice acomparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT singhanita acomparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT eslickenid acomparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT baileydalel acomparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT willowsonkathyp comparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT ryuhyunju comparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT jacksonprice comparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT singhanita comparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT eslickenid comparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate
AT baileydalel comparisonof2dand3dkidneyabsorbeddosemeasuresinpatientsreceiving177ludotatate