Cargando…

Validation of Optimum ROI Size for (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT Imaging Using a 3D Mathematical Cylinder Phantom

OBJECTIVE(S): The partial volume effect (PVE) of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) on corpus striatum imaging is caused by the underestimation of specific binding ratio (SBR). A large ROI (region of interest) set using the Southampton method is independent of PVE for SBR. The presen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onishi, Hideo, Sakai, Takayuki, Shiromoto, Osamu, Amijima, Hizuru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29998147
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2018.10638
_version_ 1783338599612153856
author Onishi, Hideo
Sakai, Takayuki
Shiromoto, Osamu
Amijima, Hizuru
author_facet Onishi, Hideo
Sakai, Takayuki
Shiromoto, Osamu
Amijima, Hizuru
author_sort Onishi, Hideo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE(S): The partial volume effect (PVE) of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) on corpus striatum imaging is caused by the underestimation of specific binding ratio (SBR). A large ROI (region of interest) set using the Southampton method is independent of PVE for SBR. The present study aimed to determine the optimal ROI size with contrast and SBR for striatum images and validate the Southampton method using a three-dimensional mathematical cylinder (3D-MAC) phantom. METHODS: We used ROIs sizes of 27, 36, 44, 51, 61, 68, and 76 mm for targets with diameters 40, 20, and 10 mm on reference and processed images reconstructed using the 3D-MAC phantom. Contrast values and SBR were compared with the theoretical values to obtain the optimal ROI size. RESULTS: The contrast values in the ROI with diameters of 51 (target: 40 mm in diameter) and 44 (target: 20 mm in diameter) mm matched the theoretical values. However, this value did not correspond with the 10-mm-diameter target. The SBR matched the theoretical value with an ROI of > 44 mm in the 20-mm-diameter target; but, it was under- and overestimated under any other conditions. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that an ROI should be 2-4 folds larger than the target size without PVE, and that the Southampton method was remarkably accurate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6038969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60389692018-07-11 Validation of Optimum ROI Size for (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT Imaging Using a 3D Mathematical Cylinder Phantom Onishi, Hideo Sakai, Takayuki Shiromoto, Osamu Amijima, Hizuru Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol Original Article OBJECTIVE(S): The partial volume effect (PVE) of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) on corpus striatum imaging is caused by the underestimation of specific binding ratio (SBR). A large ROI (region of interest) set using the Southampton method is independent of PVE for SBR. The present study aimed to determine the optimal ROI size with contrast and SBR for striatum images and validate the Southampton method using a three-dimensional mathematical cylinder (3D-MAC) phantom. METHODS: We used ROIs sizes of 27, 36, 44, 51, 61, 68, and 76 mm for targets with diameters 40, 20, and 10 mm on reference and processed images reconstructed using the 3D-MAC phantom. Contrast values and SBR were compared with the theoretical values to obtain the optimal ROI size. RESULTS: The contrast values in the ROI with diameters of 51 (target: 40 mm in diameter) and 44 (target: 20 mm in diameter) mm matched the theoretical values. However, this value did not correspond with the 10-mm-diameter target. The SBR matched the theoretical value with an ROI of > 44 mm in the 20-mm-diameter target; but, it was under- and overestimated under any other conditions. CONCLUSION: These results suggested that an ROI should be 2-4 folds larger than the target size without PVE, and that the Southampton method was remarkably accurate. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6038969/ /pubmed/29998147 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2018.10638 Text en © 2018 mums.ac.ir All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Onishi, Hideo
Sakai, Takayuki
Shiromoto, Osamu
Amijima, Hizuru
Validation of Optimum ROI Size for (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT Imaging Using a 3D Mathematical Cylinder Phantom
title Validation of Optimum ROI Size for (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT Imaging Using a 3D Mathematical Cylinder Phantom
title_full Validation of Optimum ROI Size for (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT Imaging Using a 3D Mathematical Cylinder Phantom
title_fullStr Validation of Optimum ROI Size for (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT Imaging Using a 3D Mathematical Cylinder Phantom
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Optimum ROI Size for (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT Imaging Using a 3D Mathematical Cylinder Phantom
title_short Validation of Optimum ROI Size for (123)I-FP-CIT SPECT Imaging Using a 3D Mathematical Cylinder Phantom
title_sort validation of optimum roi size for (123)i-fp-cit spect imaging using a 3d mathematical cylinder phantom
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6038969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29998147
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2018.10638
work_keys_str_mv AT onishihideo validationofoptimumroisizefor123ifpcitspectimagingusinga3dmathematicalcylinderphantom
AT sakaitakayuki validationofoptimumroisizefor123ifpcitspectimagingusinga3dmathematicalcylinderphantom
AT shiromotoosamu validationofoptimumroisizefor123ifpcitspectimagingusinga3dmathematicalcylinderphantom
AT amijimahizuru validationofoptimumroisizefor123ifpcitspectimagingusinga3dmathematicalcylinderphantom