Cargando…

Effects of Cathode Location and the Size of Anode on Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Leg Motor Area in Healthy Humans

Objective: Non-invasive brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) involves passing low currents through the brain and is a promising tool for the modulation of cortical excitability. In this study, we investigated the effects of cathode location and the size of anode f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foerster, Águida S., Rezaee, Zeynab, Paulus, Walter, Nitsche, Michael A., Dutta, Anirban
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30022928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00443
_version_ 1783338699217436672
author Foerster, Águida S.
Rezaee, Zeynab
Paulus, Walter
Nitsche, Michael A.
Dutta, Anirban
author_facet Foerster, Águida S.
Rezaee, Zeynab
Paulus, Walter
Nitsche, Michael A.
Dutta, Anirban
author_sort Foerster, Águida S.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Non-invasive brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) involves passing low currents through the brain and is a promising tool for the modulation of cortical excitability. In this study, we investigated the effects of cathode location and the size of anode for anodal tDCS of the right-leg area of the motor cortex, which is challenging due to its depth and orientation in the inter-hemispheric fissure. Methods: We first computationally investigated the effects of cathode location and the size of the anode to find the best montage for specificity of stimulation effects for the targeted leg motor area using finite element analysis (FEA). We then compared the best electrode montage found from FEA with the conventional montage (contralateral supraorbital cathode) via neurophysiological testing of both, the targeted as well as the contralateral leg motor area. Results: The conventional anodal tDCS electrode montage for leg motor cortex stimulation using a large-anode (5 cm × 7 cm, current strength 2 mA) affected the contralateral side more strongly in both the FEA and the neurophysiological testing when compared to other electrode montages. A small-anode (3.5 cm × 1 cm at 0.2 mA) with the same current density at the electrode surface and identical contralateral supraorbital cathode placement improved specificity. The best cathode location for the small-anode in terms of specificity for anodal tDCS of the right-leg motor area was T7 (10–10 EEG system). Conclusion: A small-anode (3.5 cm × 1 cm) with the same current density at the electrode surface as a large-anode (5 cm × 7 cm) resulted in similar cortical excitability alterations of the targeted leg motor cortex respresentation. In relation to the other stimulation conditions, the small-anode montage with the cathode positioned at T7 resulted in the best specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6039564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60395642018-07-18 Effects of Cathode Location and the Size of Anode on Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Leg Motor Area in Healthy Humans Foerster, Águida S. Rezaee, Zeynab Paulus, Walter Nitsche, Michael A. Dutta, Anirban Front Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: Non-invasive brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) involves passing low currents through the brain and is a promising tool for the modulation of cortical excitability. In this study, we investigated the effects of cathode location and the size of anode for anodal tDCS of the right-leg area of the motor cortex, which is challenging due to its depth and orientation in the inter-hemispheric fissure. Methods: We first computationally investigated the effects of cathode location and the size of the anode to find the best montage for specificity of stimulation effects for the targeted leg motor area using finite element analysis (FEA). We then compared the best electrode montage found from FEA with the conventional montage (contralateral supraorbital cathode) via neurophysiological testing of both, the targeted as well as the contralateral leg motor area. Results: The conventional anodal tDCS electrode montage for leg motor cortex stimulation using a large-anode (5 cm × 7 cm, current strength 2 mA) affected the contralateral side more strongly in both the FEA and the neurophysiological testing when compared to other electrode montages. A small-anode (3.5 cm × 1 cm at 0.2 mA) with the same current density at the electrode surface and identical contralateral supraorbital cathode placement improved specificity. The best cathode location for the small-anode in terms of specificity for anodal tDCS of the right-leg motor area was T7 (10–10 EEG system). Conclusion: A small-anode (3.5 cm × 1 cm) with the same current density at the electrode surface as a large-anode (5 cm × 7 cm) resulted in similar cortical excitability alterations of the targeted leg motor cortex respresentation. In relation to the other stimulation conditions, the small-anode montage with the cathode positioned at T7 resulted in the best specificity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6039564/ /pubmed/30022928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00443 Text en Copyright © 2018 Foerster, Rezaee, Paulus, Nitsche and Dutta. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Foerster, Águida S.
Rezaee, Zeynab
Paulus, Walter
Nitsche, Michael A.
Dutta, Anirban
Effects of Cathode Location and the Size of Anode on Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Leg Motor Area in Healthy Humans
title Effects of Cathode Location and the Size of Anode on Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Leg Motor Area in Healthy Humans
title_full Effects of Cathode Location and the Size of Anode on Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Leg Motor Area in Healthy Humans
title_fullStr Effects of Cathode Location and the Size of Anode on Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Leg Motor Area in Healthy Humans
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Cathode Location and the Size of Anode on Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Leg Motor Area in Healthy Humans
title_short Effects of Cathode Location and the Size of Anode on Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Leg Motor Area in Healthy Humans
title_sort effects of cathode location and the size of anode on anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area in healthy humans
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30022928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00443
work_keys_str_mv AT foersteraguidas effectsofcathodelocationandthesizeofanodeonanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoverthelegmotorareainhealthyhumans
AT rezaeezeynab effectsofcathodelocationandthesizeofanodeonanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoverthelegmotorareainhealthyhumans
AT pauluswalter effectsofcathodelocationandthesizeofanodeonanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoverthelegmotorareainhealthyhumans
AT nitschemichaela effectsofcathodelocationandthesizeofanodeonanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoverthelegmotorareainhealthyhumans
AT duttaanirban effectsofcathodelocationandthesizeofanodeonanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationoverthelegmotorareainhealthyhumans