Cargando…

Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) for treating neck pain in patients with cervical spondylosis (CS). METHODS: One hundred and twenty four patients with neck pain of CS were included, and then they were r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miao, Qiang, Qiang, Jian-hong, Jin, Yan-li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011080
_version_ 1783338712908693504
author Miao, Qiang
Qiang, Jian-hong
Jin, Yan-li
author_facet Miao, Qiang
Qiang, Jian-hong
Jin, Yan-li
author_sort Miao, Qiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) for treating neck pain in patients with cervical spondylosis (CS). METHODS: One hundred and twenty four patients with neck pain of CS were included, and then they were randomly divided into a PNMES group and a control group in a ratio of 1:1. All patients received PNMES or sham PNMES 30 minutes daily, 3 times weekly for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were evaluated by the cervical range of motion (ROM), neck disability index (NDI) score, as well as the adverse events (AEs). All outcome measurements were measured at the end of 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up after treatment. RESULTS: At the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, the patients receiving PNMES exhibited more decrease in the mean VAS (P < .01), and NDI (P < .01) respectively, compared with the patients receiving sham PNMES. Additionally, the increase in the mean ROM was also significantly higher in the PNMES group than that in the sham PNMES group at the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, respectively (P < .01). No AEs were found in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that PNMES is more effective than Sham PNMES for neck pain relief in patients with CS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6039622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60396222018-07-16 Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis Miao, Qiang Qiang, Jian-hong Jin, Yan-li Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) for treating neck pain in patients with cervical spondylosis (CS). METHODS: One hundred and twenty four patients with neck pain of CS were included, and then they were randomly divided into a PNMES group and a control group in a ratio of 1:1. All patients received PNMES or sham PNMES 30 minutes daily, 3 times weekly for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were evaluated by the cervical range of motion (ROM), neck disability index (NDI) score, as well as the adverse events (AEs). All outcome measurements were measured at the end of 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up after treatment. RESULTS: At the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, the patients receiving PNMES exhibited more decrease in the mean VAS (P < .01), and NDI (P < .01) respectively, compared with the patients receiving sham PNMES. Additionally, the increase in the mean ROM was also significantly higher in the PNMES group than that in the sham PNMES group at the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, respectively (P < .01). No AEs were found in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that PNMES is more effective than Sham PNMES for neck pain relief in patients with CS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6039622/ /pubmed/29952946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011080 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Miao, Qiang
Qiang, Jian-hong
Jin, Yan-li
Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis
title Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis
title_full Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis
title_short Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis
title_sort effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011080
work_keys_str_mv AT miaoqiang effectivenessofpercutaneousneuromuscularelectricalstimulationforneckpainreliefinpatientswithcervicalspondylosis
AT qiangjianhong effectivenessofpercutaneousneuromuscularelectricalstimulationforneckpainreliefinpatientswithcervicalspondylosis
AT jinyanli effectivenessofpercutaneousneuromuscularelectricalstimulationforneckpainreliefinpatientswithcervicalspondylosis