Cargando…
Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) for treating neck pain in patients with cervical spondylosis (CS). METHODS: One hundred and twenty four patients with neck pain of CS were included, and then they were r...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011080 |
_version_ | 1783338712908693504 |
---|---|
author | Miao, Qiang Qiang, Jian-hong Jin, Yan-li |
author_facet | Miao, Qiang Qiang, Jian-hong Jin, Yan-li |
author_sort | Miao, Qiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) for treating neck pain in patients with cervical spondylosis (CS). METHODS: One hundred and twenty four patients with neck pain of CS were included, and then they were randomly divided into a PNMES group and a control group in a ratio of 1:1. All patients received PNMES or sham PNMES 30 minutes daily, 3 times weekly for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were evaluated by the cervical range of motion (ROM), neck disability index (NDI) score, as well as the adverse events (AEs). All outcome measurements were measured at the end of 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up after treatment. RESULTS: At the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, the patients receiving PNMES exhibited more decrease in the mean VAS (P < .01), and NDI (P < .01) respectively, compared with the patients receiving sham PNMES. Additionally, the increase in the mean ROM was also significantly higher in the PNMES group than that in the sham PNMES group at the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, respectively (P < .01). No AEs were found in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that PNMES is more effective than Sham PNMES for neck pain relief in patients with CS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6039622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60396222018-07-16 Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis Miao, Qiang Qiang, Jian-hong Jin, Yan-li Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (PNMES) for treating neck pain in patients with cervical spondylosis (CS). METHODS: One hundred and twenty four patients with neck pain of CS were included, and then they were randomly divided into a PNMES group and a control group in a ratio of 1:1. All patients received PNMES or sham PNMES 30 minutes daily, 3 times weekly for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were evaluated by the cervical range of motion (ROM), neck disability index (NDI) score, as well as the adverse events (AEs). All outcome measurements were measured at the end of 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up after treatment. RESULTS: At the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, the patients receiving PNMES exhibited more decrease in the mean VAS (P < .01), and NDI (P < .01) respectively, compared with the patients receiving sham PNMES. Additionally, the increase in the mean ROM was also significantly higher in the PNMES group than that in the sham PNMES group at the end of the 12-week treatment, and 4-week follow-up, respectively (P < .01). No AEs were found in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that PNMES is more effective than Sham PNMES for neck pain relief in patients with CS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6039622/ /pubmed/29952946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011080 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Miao, Qiang Qiang, Jian-hong Jin, Yan-li Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis |
title | Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis |
title_full | Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis |
title_short | Effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis |
title_sort | effectiveness of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation for neck pain relief in patients with cervical spondylosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miaoqiang effectivenessofpercutaneousneuromuscularelectricalstimulationforneckpainreliefinpatientswithcervicalspondylosis AT qiangjianhong effectivenessofpercutaneousneuromuscularelectricalstimulationforneckpainreliefinpatientswithcervicalspondylosis AT jinyanli effectivenessofpercutaneousneuromuscularelectricalstimulationforneckpainreliefinpatientswithcervicalspondylosis |