Cargando…

eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders and depression are frequent conditions in childhood and adolescence. eMental healthcare technologies may improve access to services, but their uptake within health systems is limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to examine and describe how the implementa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wozney, Lori, McGrath, Patrick J, Gehring, Nicole D, Bennett, Kathryn, Huguet, Anna, Hartling, Lisa, Dyson, Michele P, Soleimani, Amir, Newton, Amanda S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945858
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9655
_version_ 1783338741298888704
author Wozney, Lori
McGrath, Patrick J
Gehring, Nicole D
Bennett, Kathryn
Huguet, Anna
Hartling, Lisa
Dyson, Michele P
Soleimani, Amir
Newton, Amanda S
author_facet Wozney, Lori
McGrath, Patrick J
Gehring, Nicole D
Bennett, Kathryn
Huguet, Anna
Hartling, Lisa
Dyson, Michele P
Soleimani, Amir
Newton, Amanda S
author_sort Wozney, Lori
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders and depression are frequent conditions in childhood and adolescence. eMental healthcare technologies may improve access to services, but their uptake within health systems is limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to examine and describe how the implementation of eMental healthcare technologies for anxiety disorders and depression in children and adolescents has been studied. METHODS: We conducted a search of 5 electronic databases and gray literature. Eligible studies were those that assessed an eMental healthcare technology for treating or preventing anxiety or depression, included children or adolescents (<18 years), or their parents or healthcare providers and reported findings on technology implementation. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Outcomes of interest were based on 8 implementation outcomes: acceptability (satisfaction with a technology), adoption (technology uptake and utilization), appropriateness (“fitness for purpose”), cost (financial impact of technology implementation), feasibility (extent to which a technology was successfully used), fidelity (implementation as intended), penetration (“spread” or “reach” of the technology), and sustainability (maintenance or integration of a technology within a healthcare service). For extracted implementation outcome data, we coded favorable ratings on measurement scales as “positive results” and unfavorable ratings on measurement scales as “negative results.” Those studies that reported both positive and negative findings were coded as having “mixed results.” RESULTS: A total of 46 studies met the inclusion criteria, the majority of which were rated as very good to excellent in methodological quality. These studies investigated eMental healthcare technologies for anxiety (n=23), depression (n=18), or both anxiety and depression (n=5). Studies of technologies for anxiety evaluated the following: (1) acceptability (78%) reported high levels of satisfaction, (2) adoption (43%) commonly reported positive results, and (3) feasibility (43%) reported mixed results. Studies of technologies for depression evaluated the following: (1) appropriateness (56%) reported moderate helpfulness and (2) acceptability (50%) described a mix of both positive and negative findings. Studies of technologies designed to aid anxiety and depression commonly reported mixed experiences with acceptability and adoption and positive findings for appropriateness of the technologies for treatment. Across all studies, cost, fidelity, and penetration and sustainability were the least measured implementation outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability of eMental healthcare technology is high among users and is the most commonly investigated implementation outcome. Perceptions of the appropriateness and adoption of eMental healthcare technology were varied. Implementation research that identifies, evaluates, and reports on costs, sustainability, and fidelity to clinical guidelines is crucial for making high-quality eMental healthcare available to children and adolescents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6039769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60397692018-07-12 eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes Wozney, Lori McGrath, Patrick J Gehring, Nicole D Bennett, Kathryn Huguet, Anna Hartling, Lisa Dyson, Michele P Soleimani, Amir Newton, Amanda S JMIR Ment Health Review BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders and depression are frequent conditions in childhood and adolescence. eMental healthcare technologies may improve access to services, but their uptake within health systems is limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to examine and describe how the implementation of eMental healthcare technologies for anxiety disorders and depression in children and adolescents has been studied. METHODS: We conducted a search of 5 electronic databases and gray literature. Eligible studies were those that assessed an eMental healthcare technology for treating or preventing anxiety or depression, included children or adolescents (<18 years), or their parents or healthcare providers and reported findings on technology implementation. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Outcomes of interest were based on 8 implementation outcomes: acceptability (satisfaction with a technology), adoption (technology uptake and utilization), appropriateness (“fitness for purpose”), cost (financial impact of technology implementation), feasibility (extent to which a technology was successfully used), fidelity (implementation as intended), penetration (“spread” or “reach” of the technology), and sustainability (maintenance or integration of a technology within a healthcare service). For extracted implementation outcome data, we coded favorable ratings on measurement scales as “positive results” and unfavorable ratings on measurement scales as “negative results.” Those studies that reported both positive and negative findings were coded as having “mixed results.” RESULTS: A total of 46 studies met the inclusion criteria, the majority of which were rated as very good to excellent in methodological quality. These studies investigated eMental healthcare technologies for anxiety (n=23), depression (n=18), or both anxiety and depression (n=5). Studies of technologies for anxiety evaluated the following: (1) acceptability (78%) reported high levels of satisfaction, (2) adoption (43%) commonly reported positive results, and (3) feasibility (43%) reported mixed results. Studies of technologies for depression evaluated the following: (1) appropriateness (56%) reported moderate helpfulness and (2) acceptability (50%) described a mix of both positive and negative findings. Studies of technologies designed to aid anxiety and depression commonly reported mixed experiences with acceptability and adoption and positive findings for appropriateness of the technologies for treatment. Across all studies, cost, fidelity, and penetration and sustainability were the least measured implementation outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability of eMental healthcare technology is high among users and is the most commonly investigated implementation outcome. Perceptions of the appropriateness and adoption of eMental healthcare technology were varied. Implementation research that identifies, evaluates, and reports on costs, sustainability, and fidelity to clinical guidelines is crucial for making high-quality eMental healthcare available to children and adolescents. JMIR Publications 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6039769/ /pubmed/29945858 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9655 Text en ©Lori Wozney, Patrick J McGrath, Nicole D Gehring, Kathryn Bennett, Anna Huguet, Lisa Hartling, Michele P Dyson, Amir Soleimani, Amanda S Newton. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 26.06.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Wozney, Lori
McGrath, Patrick J
Gehring, Nicole D
Bennett, Kathryn
Huguet, Anna
Hartling, Lisa
Dyson, Michele P
Soleimani, Amir
Newton, Amanda S
eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes
title eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes
title_full eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes
title_fullStr eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes
title_short eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes
title_sort emental healthcare technologies for anxiety and depression in childhood and adolescence: systematic review of studies reporting implementation outcomes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29945858
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9655
work_keys_str_mv AT wozneylori ementalhealthcaretechnologiesforanxietyanddepressioninchildhoodandadolescencesystematicreviewofstudiesreportingimplementationoutcomes
AT mcgrathpatrickj ementalhealthcaretechnologiesforanxietyanddepressioninchildhoodandadolescencesystematicreviewofstudiesreportingimplementationoutcomes
AT gehringnicoled ementalhealthcaretechnologiesforanxietyanddepressioninchildhoodandadolescencesystematicreviewofstudiesreportingimplementationoutcomes
AT bennettkathryn ementalhealthcaretechnologiesforanxietyanddepressioninchildhoodandadolescencesystematicreviewofstudiesreportingimplementationoutcomes
AT huguetanna ementalhealthcaretechnologiesforanxietyanddepressioninchildhoodandadolescencesystematicreviewofstudiesreportingimplementationoutcomes
AT hartlinglisa ementalhealthcaretechnologiesforanxietyanddepressioninchildhoodandadolescencesystematicreviewofstudiesreportingimplementationoutcomes
AT dysonmichelep ementalhealthcaretechnologiesforanxietyanddepressioninchildhoodandadolescencesystematicreviewofstudiesreportingimplementationoutcomes
AT soleimaniamir ementalhealthcaretechnologiesforanxietyanddepressioninchildhoodandadolescencesystematicreviewofstudiesreportingimplementationoutcomes
AT newtonamandas ementalhealthcaretechnologiesforanxietyanddepressioninchildhoodandadolescencesystematicreviewofstudiesreportingimplementationoutcomes