Cargando…
The nociception level index (NOL) response to intubation and incision in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with and without thoracic epidural analgesia. A pilot study.
Background: The PMD100™ (Medasense Biometrics Ltd., Ramat Yishai, Israel) is a novel non-invasive nociception monitor that integrates physiological parameters to compute a real-time nociception level index (NOL) in the anesthetized patients. Thoracic epidural analgesia provides effective analgesia a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026938 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15279.1 |
_version_ | 1783338767243804672 |
---|---|
author | Bollag, Laurent Jelacic, Srdjan Delgado Upegui, Carlos Wu, Cynthia Richebe, Philippe |
author_facet | Bollag, Laurent Jelacic, Srdjan Delgado Upegui, Carlos Wu, Cynthia Richebe, Philippe |
author_sort | Bollag, Laurent |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The PMD100™ (Medasense Biometrics Ltd., Ramat Yishai, Israel) is a novel non-invasive nociception monitor that integrates physiological parameters to compute a real-time nociception level index (NOL) in the anesthetized patients. Thoracic epidural analgesia provides effective analgesia and improves surgical outcomes. Side effects include sympathectomy, hypotension, changes in skin temperature and a decreased cardiac accelerator fiber tone. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate changes in NOL values after incision in patients with and without epidural analgesia. Methods: Half of the patients scheduled for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) received a thoracic epidural catheter, placed and tested 2h before surgery and activated prior to incision. The other half of the patients received i.v. fentanyl (1 mcg/kg) five minutes before incision. Anesthesia and analgesia were maintained in a standardized manner. NOL and heart rate (HR) were compared before and after the nociceptive stimuli intubation and skin incision. Results: NOL significantly increased in all patients after intubation by 10.2 points (CI: 4.5-16.0; p=0.002) as well as HR by 9 beats per minute after intubation in all patients (CI: 3.3-15.6; p=0.01). After incision, in patients without epidural analgesia the NOL increased by 13.9 points (CI: 7.4-20.3; p=0.0001), compared to 5.4 points (CI: -6.3-17.1; p=0.29) in patients with epidural analgesia. HR did not significantly vary after incision in both groups. The area under the curve of delta NOL and delta HR variations after incision were significantly different (p<0.05) between groups and delta NOL variations were significantly different from baseline values but not the delta HR variations. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that the PMD100™ Monitor may be a useful tool to evaluate the efficacy of an intraoperative thoracic epidural analgesia. Clinical Trial Registry Number: ClinicalTrials.gov record ID: NCT01978379 registered 10/25/2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6039929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60399292018-07-18 The nociception level index (NOL) response to intubation and incision in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with and without thoracic epidural analgesia. A pilot study. Bollag, Laurent Jelacic, Srdjan Delgado Upegui, Carlos Wu, Cynthia Richebe, Philippe F1000Res Research Article Background: The PMD100™ (Medasense Biometrics Ltd., Ramat Yishai, Israel) is a novel non-invasive nociception monitor that integrates physiological parameters to compute a real-time nociception level index (NOL) in the anesthetized patients. Thoracic epidural analgesia provides effective analgesia and improves surgical outcomes. Side effects include sympathectomy, hypotension, changes in skin temperature and a decreased cardiac accelerator fiber tone. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate changes in NOL values after incision in patients with and without epidural analgesia. Methods: Half of the patients scheduled for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) received a thoracic epidural catheter, placed and tested 2h before surgery and activated prior to incision. The other half of the patients received i.v. fentanyl (1 mcg/kg) five minutes before incision. Anesthesia and analgesia were maintained in a standardized manner. NOL and heart rate (HR) were compared before and after the nociceptive stimuli intubation and skin incision. Results: NOL significantly increased in all patients after intubation by 10.2 points (CI: 4.5-16.0; p=0.002) as well as HR by 9 beats per minute after intubation in all patients (CI: 3.3-15.6; p=0.01). After incision, in patients without epidural analgesia the NOL increased by 13.9 points (CI: 7.4-20.3; p=0.0001), compared to 5.4 points (CI: -6.3-17.1; p=0.29) in patients with epidural analgesia. HR did not significantly vary after incision in both groups. The area under the curve of delta NOL and delta HR variations after incision were significantly different (p<0.05) between groups and delta NOL variations were significantly different from baseline values but not the delta HR variations. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that the PMD100™ Monitor may be a useful tool to evaluate the efficacy of an intraoperative thoracic epidural analgesia. Clinical Trial Registry Number: ClinicalTrials.gov record ID: NCT01978379 registered 10/25/2014. F1000 Research Limited 2018-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6039929/ /pubmed/30026938 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15279.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Bollag L et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bollag, Laurent Jelacic, Srdjan Delgado Upegui, Carlos Wu, Cynthia Richebe, Philippe The nociception level index (NOL) response to intubation and incision in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with and without thoracic epidural analgesia. A pilot study. |
title | The nociception level index (NOL) response to intubation and incision in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with and without thoracic epidural analgesia. A pilot study. |
title_full | The nociception level index (NOL) response to intubation and incision in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with and without thoracic epidural analgesia. A pilot study. |
title_fullStr | The nociception level index (NOL) response to intubation and incision in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with and without thoracic epidural analgesia. A pilot study. |
title_full_unstemmed | The nociception level index (NOL) response to intubation and incision in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with and without thoracic epidural analgesia. A pilot study. |
title_short | The nociception level index (NOL) response to intubation and incision in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with and without thoracic epidural analgesia. A pilot study. |
title_sort | nociception level index (nol) response to intubation and incision in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (vats) with and without thoracic epidural analgesia. a pilot study. |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026938 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15279.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bollaglaurent thenociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy AT jelacicsrdjan thenociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy AT delgadoupeguicarlos thenociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy AT wucynthia thenociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy AT richebephilippe thenociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy AT bollaglaurent nociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy AT jelacicsrdjan nociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy AT delgadoupeguicarlos nociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy AT wucynthia nociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy AT richebephilippe nociceptionlevelindexnolresponsetointubationandincisioninpatientsundergoingvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatswithandwithoutthoracicepiduralanalgesiaapilotstudy |