Cargando…

Real world evidence (RWE) – a disruptive innovation or the quiet evolution of medical evidence generation?

Stakeholders in healthcare are increasingly turning to real world evidence (RWE) to inform their decisions, alongside evidence from randomized controlled trials. RWE is generated by analysing data gathered from routine clinical practice, and can be used across the product lifecycle, providing insigh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khosla, Sajan, White, Robert, Medina, Jesús, Ouwens, Mario, Emmas, Cathy, Koder, Tim, Male, Gary, Leonard, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026923
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13585.2
_version_ 1783338770247974912
author Khosla, Sajan
White, Robert
Medina, Jesús
Ouwens, Mario
Emmas, Cathy
Koder, Tim
Male, Gary
Leonard, Sandra
author_facet Khosla, Sajan
White, Robert
Medina, Jesús
Ouwens, Mario
Emmas, Cathy
Koder, Tim
Male, Gary
Leonard, Sandra
author_sort Khosla, Sajan
collection PubMed
description Stakeholders in healthcare are increasingly turning to real world evidence (RWE) to inform their decisions, alongside evidence from randomized controlled trials. RWE is generated by analysing data gathered from routine clinical practice, and can be used across the product lifecycle, providing insights into areas including disease epidemiology, treatment effectiveness and safety, and health economic value and impact. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have stated their ambition for greater use of RWE to support applications for new indications, and are now consulting with their stakeholders to formalize standards and expected methods for generating RWE. Pharmaceutical companies are responding to the increasing demands for RWE by developing standards and processes for each stage of the evidence generation pathway. Some conventions are already in place for assuring quality, whereas other processes are specific to the research question and data sources available. As evidence generation increasingly becomes a core role of medical affairs divisions in large pharmaceutical companies, standards of rigour will continue to evolve and improve. Senior pharmaceutical leaders can drive this change by making RWE a core element of their corporate strategy, providing top-level direction on how their respective companies should approach RWE for maximum quality. Here, we describe the current and future areas of RWE application within the pharmaceutical industry, necessary access to data to generate RWE, and the challenges in communicating RWE. Supporting and building on viewpoints from industry and publicly funded research, our perspective is that at each stage of RWE generation, quality will be critical to the impact that RWE has on healthcare decision-makers; not only where RWE is an established and evolving tool, but also in new areas that have the potential to disrupt and to improve drug development pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6039945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60399452018-07-18 Real world evidence (RWE) – a disruptive innovation or the quiet evolution of medical evidence generation? Khosla, Sajan White, Robert Medina, Jesús Ouwens, Mario Emmas, Cathy Koder, Tim Male, Gary Leonard, Sandra F1000Res Opinion Article Stakeholders in healthcare are increasingly turning to real world evidence (RWE) to inform their decisions, alongside evidence from randomized controlled trials. RWE is generated by analysing data gathered from routine clinical practice, and can be used across the product lifecycle, providing insights into areas including disease epidemiology, treatment effectiveness and safety, and health economic value and impact. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have stated their ambition for greater use of RWE to support applications for new indications, and are now consulting with their stakeholders to formalize standards and expected methods for generating RWE. Pharmaceutical companies are responding to the increasing demands for RWE by developing standards and processes for each stage of the evidence generation pathway. Some conventions are already in place for assuring quality, whereas other processes are specific to the research question and data sources available. As evidence generation increasingly becomes a core role of medical affairs divisions in large pharmaceutical companies, standards of rigour will continue to evolve and improve. Senior pharmaceutical leaders can drive this change by making RWE a core element of their corporate strategy, providing top-level direction on how their respective companies should approach RWE for maximum quality. Here, we describe the current and future areas of RWE application within the pharmaceutical industry, necessary access to data to generate RWE, and the challenges in communicating RWE. Supporting and building on viewpoints from industry and publicly funded research, our perspective is that at each stage of RWE generation, quality will be critical to the impact that RWE has on healthcare decision-makers; not only where RWE is an established and evolving tool, but also in new areas that have the potential to disrupt and to improve drug development pathways. F1000 Research Limited 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6039945/ /pubmed/30026923 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13585.2 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Khosla S et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Opinion Article
Khosla, Sajan
White, Robert
Medina, Jesús
Ouwens, Mario
Emmas, Cathy
Koder, Tim
Male, Gary
Leonard, Sandra
Real world evidence (RWE) – a disruptive innovation or the quiet evolution of medical evidence generation?
title Real world evidence (RWE) – a disruptive innovation or the quiet evolution of medical evidence generation?
title_full Real world evidence (RWE) – a disruptive innovation or the quiet evolution of medical evidence generation?
title_fullStr Real world evidence (RWE) – a disruptive innovation or the quiet evolution of medical evidence generation?
title_full_unstemmed Real world evidence (RWE) – a disruptive innovation or the quiet evolution of medical evidence generation?
title_short Real world evidence (RWE) – a disruptive innovation or the quiet evolution of medical evidence generation?
title_sort real world evidence (rwe) – a disruptive innovation or the quiet evolution of medical evidence generation?
topic Opinion Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026923
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13585.2
work_keys_str_mv AT khoslasajan realworldevidencerweadisruptiveinnovationorthequietevolutionofmedicalevidencegeneration
AT whiterobert realworldevidencerweadisruptiveinnovationorthequietevolutionofmedicalevidencegeneration
AT medinajesus realworldevidencerweadisruptiveinnovationorthequietevolutionofmedicalevidencegeneration
AT ouwensmario realworldevidencerweadisruptiveinnovationorthequietevolutionofmedicalevidencegeneration
AT emmascathy realworldevidencerweadisruptiveinnovationorthequietevolutionofmedicalevidencegeneration
AT kodertim realworldevidencerweadisruptiveinnovationorthequietevolutionofmedicalevidencegeneration
AT malegary realworldevidencerweadisruptiveinnovationorthequietevolutionofmedicalevidencegeneration
AT leonardsandra realworldevidencerweadisruptiveinnovationorthequietevolutionofmedicalevidencegeneration