Cargando…

Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends

Abstract. Several fragrances are important contact allergens. Compared to the immense multitude of more than 2,500 fragrances used in cosmetics, the spectrum of single substances and natural extracts used for patch testing appears limited, albeit comprising the supposedly most important contact alle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Uter, W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30402616
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALX01604E
_version_ 1783338782432428032
author Uter, W.
author_facet Uter, W.
author_sort Uter, W.
collection PubMed
description Abstract. Several fragrances are important contact allergens. Compared to the immense multitude of more than 2,500 fragrances used in cosmetics, the spectrum of single substances and natural extracts used for patch testing appears limited, albeit comprising the supposedly most important contact allergens. The present review summarizes the most important results of the opinion of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety on fragrance allergens in cosmetic products from July 2012. Clinical results beyond abovementioned screening allergens, animal results in terms of the LLNA and structure activity considerations point to 100 single substances and extracts, respectively, which, in addition to those 26 already identified, must be considered contact allergens, and the presence of which should be declared in cosmetics. In case of the most commonly used fragrance terpenes limonene and linalool hydroperoxides resulting from autoxidation constitute the major allergens. These have become available as patch test material recently. Altogether 12 single substances have caused a (very) high number of published cases of sensitization. Thus their use concentration should be (further) reduced or, in case of hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC, e.g., Lyral(®)), use should be abandoned altogether. This is also recommended in case of oak moss and tree moss due to their content of the strong sensitizers atranol and chloroatranol. As generic maximum dose for the remaining 11 single substances 0.8 µg/cm(2) are suggested, which corresponds, under conservative assumptions, a maximum concentration of 100 ppm in the finished product.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6040011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60400112018-11-06 Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends Uter, W. Allergol Select Review Article Abstract. Several fragrances are important contact allergens. Compared to the immense multitude of more than 2,500 fragrances used in cosmetics, the spectrum of single substances and natural extracts used for patch testing appears limited, albeit comprising the supposedly most important contact allergens. The present review summarizes the most important results of the opinion of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety on fragrance allergens in cosmetic products from July 2012. Clinical results beyond abovementioned screening allergens, animal results in terms of the LLNA and structure activity considerations point to 100 single substances and extracts, respectively, which, in addition to those 26 already identified, must be considered contact allergens, and the presence of which should be declared in cosmetics. In case of the most commonly used fragrance terpenes limonene and linalool hydroperoxides resulting from autoxidation constitute the major allergens. These have become available as patch test material recently. Altogether 12 single substances have caused a (very) high number of published cases of sensitization. Thus their use concentration should be (further) reduced or, in case of hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC, e.g., Lyral(®)), use should be abandoned altogether. This is also recommended in case of oak moss and tree moss due to their content of the strong sensitizers atranol and chloroatranol. As generic maximum dose for the remaining 11 single substances 0.8 µg/cm(2) are suggested, which corresponds, under conservative assumptions, a maximum concentration of 100 ppm in the finished product. Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6040011/ /pubmed/30402616 http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALX01604E Text en © Dustri-Verlag Dr. K. Feistle http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Uter, W.
Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends
title Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends
title_full Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends
title_fullStr Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends
title_full_unstemmed Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends
title_short Contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends
title_sort contact allergy to fragrances: current clinical and regulatory trends
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30402616
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALX01604E
work_keys_str_mv AT uterw contactallergytofragrancescurrentclinicalandregulatorytrends