Cargando…

Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology – a retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the association between the most commonly used ovarian responsiveness markers – age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) – and ovarian responsiveness t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selcuk, Selcuk, Bilgic, Bulent Emre, Kilicci, Cetin, Kucukbas, Mehmet, Cam, Cetin, Kutlu, Huseyin Tayfun, Karateke, Ates
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002704
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.62447
_version_ 1783338802015633408
author Selcuk, Selcuk
Bilgic, Bulent Emre
Kilicci, Cetin
Kucukbas, Mehmet
Cam, Cetin
Kutlu, Huseyin Tayfun
Karateke, Ates
author_facet Selcuk, Selcuk
Bilgic, Bulent Emre
Kilicci, Cetin
Kucukbas, Mehmet
Cam, Cetin
Kutlu, Huseyin Tayfun
Karateke, Ates
author_sort Selcuk, Selcuk
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the association between the most commonly used ovarian responsiveness markers – age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) – and ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropin stimulation in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment using either a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or agonist protocol were enrolled in the study. Data of the patients were abstracted from the hospital’s database. Tests were compared for total number of retrieved oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, embryos, good quality embryos on day 1 and day 3, and ongoing pregnancies per cycle. RESULTS: The OSI was the ovarian response test that had the strongest relationship with the ART outcomes. The level of association between the ovarian response tests and poor ovarian response data was (in descending order): OSI, ORPI, AFC, AMH, and age (AUC(OSI) = 0.976, AUC(ORPI) = 0.905, AUC(AFC) = 0.899, AUC(AMH) = 0.864, AUC(age) = 0.617). The overall association between OSI and poor ovarian response was significantly higher than the other parameters (p (1) = 0.0023, p (2) = 0.0014, p (3) = 0.0001, p (4) ≤ 0.0001). In patients with high ovarian response data, OSI had the highest association, followed by AFC and ORPI age (AUC(OSI) = 0.984, AUC(AFC) = 0.907, AUC(ORPI) = 0.887). There was no statistically significant difference among the tests for the data of patients with ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, which is the first study comparing the five most frequently used ovarian responsiveness markers and the second study signifying the role of OSI in an antagonist protocol, OSI was found to be more convenient to calculate, and it could be superior to other ovarian responsiveness markers for poor and high ovarian responses on cycles with agonist or antagonist protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6040134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60401342018-07-12 Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology – a retrospective analysis Selcuk, Selcuk Bilgic, Bulent Emre Kilicci, Cetin Kucukbas, Mehmet Cam, Cetin Kutlu, Huseyin Tayfun Karateke, Ates Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the association between the most commonly used ovarian responsiveness markers – age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) – and ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropin stimulation in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment using either a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or agonist protocol were enrolled in the study. Data of the patients were abstracted from the hospital’s database. Tests were compared for total number of retrieved oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, embryos, good quality embryos on day 1 and day 3, and ongoing pregnancies per cycle. RESULTS: The OSI was the ovarian response test that had the strongest relationship with the ART outcomes. The level of association between the ovarian response tests and poor ovarian response data was (in descending order): OSI, ORPI, AFC, AMH, and age (AUC(OSI) = 0.976, AUC(ORPI) = 0.905, AUC(AFC) = 0.899, AUC(AMH) = 0.864, AUC(age) = 0.617). The overall association between OSI and poor ovarian response was significantly higher than the other parameters (p (1) = 0.0023, p (2) = 0.0014, p (3) = 0.0001, p (4) ≤ 0.0001). In patients with high ovarian response data, OSI had the highest association, followed by AFC and ORPI age (AUC(OSI) = 0.984, AUC(AFC) = 0.907, AUC(ORPI) = 0.887). There was no statistically significant difference among the tests for the data of patients with ongoing pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, which is the first study comparing the five most frequently used ovarian responsiveness markers and the second study signifying the role of OSI in an antagonist protocol, OSI was found to be more convenient to calculate, and it could be superior to other ovarian responsiveness markers for poor and high ovarian responses on cycles with agonist or antagonist protocols. Termedia Publishing House 2016-09-22 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6040134/ /pubmed/30002704 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.62447 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Selcuk, Selcuk
Bilgic, Bulent Emre
Kilicci, Cetin
Kucukbas, Mehmet
Cam, Cetin
Kutlu, Huseyin Tayfun
Karateke, Ates
Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology – a retrospective analysis
title Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology – a retrospective analysis
title_full Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology – a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology – a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology – a retrospective analysis
title_short Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology – a retrospective analysis
title_sort comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology – a retrospective analysis
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002704
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.62447
work_keys_str_mv AT selcukselcuk comparisonofovarianresponsivenesstestswithoutcomeofassistedreproductivetechnologyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT bilgicbulentemre comparisonofovarianresponsivenesstestswithoutcomeofassistedreproductivetechnologyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT kiliccicetin comparisonofovarianresponsivenesstestswithoutcomeofassistedreproductivetechnologyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT kucukbasmehmet comparisonofovarianresponsivenesstestswithoutcomeofassistedreproductivetechnologyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT camcetin comparisonofovarianresponsivenesstestswithoutcomeofassistedreproductivetechnologyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT kutluhuseyintayfun comparisonofovarianresponsivenesstestswithoutcomeofassistedreproductivetechnologyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT karatekeates comparisonofovarianresponsivenesstestswithoutcomeofassistedreproductivetechnologyaretrospectiveanalysis