Cargando…

Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies

During emergency queen rearing, worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) select several otherwise worker-destined larvae to instead rear as candidates to replace their dead or failing queen. This choice is crucial as the queen is the sole reproductive in the colony and her quality is essential to its succ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Withrow, James M., Tarpy, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199124
_version_ 1783338874982891520
author Withrow, James M.
Tarpy, David R.
author_facet Withrow, James M.
Tarpy, David R.
author_sort Withrow, James M.
collection PubMed
description During emergency queen rearing, worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) select several otherwise worker-destined larvae to instead rear as candidates to replace their dead or failing queen. This choice is crucial as the queen is the sole reproductive in the colony and her quality is essential to its success. Because honey bee queens mate with and store sperm from multiple drones, emergency queen selection presents workers with an opportunity to increase fitness by selecting full- (0.75 relatedness), rather than half- (0.25 relatedness), sisters as new queen candidates. Through patriline analysis of colonies along with large numbers of emergency queens reared by each we affirm the purported “royal” patriline theory that, instead of competing nepotistically, workers exhibit bias towards selecting individuals from particular “royal” subfamilies during emergency queen rearing events, Further, we show that these “royal” patrilines are cryptic in honey bee colonies; occurring in such low frequency in the overall colony population that they are frequently undetected in traditional tests of queen mating number and colony composition. The identification of these cryptic “royal” subfamilies reveals that honey bee queens, already considered “hyperpolyandrous,” are mating with even more males than has been previously recognized. These results alter our understanding of reproductive behavior in honey bees, raising questions about the evolutionary implications of this phenomenon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6040692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60406922018-07-19 Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies Withrow, James M. Tarpy, David R. PLoS One Research Article During emergency queen rearing, worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) select several otherwise worker-destined larvae to instead rear as candidates to replace their dead or failing queen. This choice is crucial as the queen is the sole reproductive in the colony and her quality is essential to its success. Because honey bee queens mate with and store sperm from multiple drones, emergency queen selection presents workers with an opportunity to increase fitness by selecting full- (0.75 relatedness), rather than half- (0.25 relatedness), sisters as new queen candidates. Through patriline analysis of colonies along with large numbers of emergency queens reared by each we affirm the purported “royal” patriline theory that, instead of competing nepotistically, workers exhibit bias towards selecting individuals from particular “royal” subfamilies during emergency queen rearing events, Further, we show that these “royal” patrilines are cryptic in honey bee colonies; occurring in such low frequency in the overall colony population that they are frequently undetected in traditional tests of queen mating number and colony composition. The identification of these cryptic “royal” subfamilies reveals that honey bee queens, already considered “hyperpolyandrous,” are mating with even more males than has been previously recognized. These results alter our understanding of reproductive behavior in honey bees, raising questions about the evolutionary implications of this phenomenon. Public Library of Science 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6040692/ /pubmed/29995879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199124 Text en © 2018 Withrow, Tarpy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Withrow, James M.
Tarpy, David R.
Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies
title Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies
title_full Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies
title_fullStr Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies
title_full_unstemmed Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies
title_short Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies
title_sort cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (apis mellifera) colonies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199124
work_keys_str_mv AT withrowjamesm crypticroyalsubfamiliesinhoneybeeapismelliferacolonies
AT tarpydavidr crypticroyalsubfamiliesinhoneybeeapismelliferacolonies