Cargando…
Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies
During emergency queen rearing, worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) select several otherwise worker-destined larvae to instead rear as candidates to replace their dead or failing queen. This choice is crucial as the queen is the sole reproductive in the colony and her quality is essential to its succ...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199124 |
_version_ | 1783338874982891520 |
---|---|
author | Withrow, James M. Tarpy, David R. |
author_facet | Withrow, James M. Tarpy, David R. |
author_sort | Withrow, James M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | During emergency queen rearing, worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) select several otherwise worker-destined larvae to instead rear as candidates to replace their dead or failing queen. This choice is crucial as the queen is the sole reproductive in the colony and her quality is essential to its success. Because honey bee queens mate with and store sperm from multiple drones, emergency queen selection presents workers with an opportunity to increase fitness by selecting full- (0.75 relatedness), rather than half- (0.25 relatedness), sisters as new queen candidates. Through patriline analysis of colonies along with large numbers of emergency queens reared by each we affirm the purported “royal” patriline theory that, instead of competing nepotistically, workers exhibit bias towards selecting individuals from particular “royal” subfamilies during emergency queen rearing events, Further, we show that these “royal” patrilines are cryptic in honey bee colonies; occurring in such low frequency in the overall colony population that they are frequently undetected in traditional tests of queen mating number and colony composition. The identification of these cryptic “royal” subfamilies reveals that honey bee queens, already considered “hyperpolyandrous,” are mating with even more males than has been previously recognized. These results alter our understanding of reproductive behavior in honey bees, raising questions about the evolutionary implications of this phenomenon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6040692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60406922018-07-19 Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies Withrow, James M. Tarpy, David R. PLoS One Research Article During emergency queen rearing, worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) select several otherwise worker-destined larvae to instead rear as candidates to replace their dead or failing queen. This choice is crucial as the queen is the sole reproductive in the colony and her quality is essential to its success. Because honey bee queens mate with and store sperm from multiple drones, emergency queen selection presents workers with an opportunity to increase fitness by selecting full- (0.75 relatedness), rather than half- (0.25 relatedness), sisters as new queen candidates. Through patriline analysis of colonies along with large numbers of emergency queens reared by each we affirm the purported “royal” patriline theory that, instead of competing nepotistically, workers exhibit bias towards selecting individuals from particular “royal” subfamilies during emergency queen rearing events, Further, we show that these “royal” patrilines are cryptic in honey bee colonies; occurring in such low frequency in the overall colony population that they are frequently undetected in traditional tests of queen mating number and colony composition. The identification of these cryptic “royal” subfamilies reveals that honey bee queens, already considered “hyperpolyandrous,” are mating with even more males than has been previously recognized. These results alter our understanding of reproductive behavior in honey bees, raising questions about the evolutionary implications of this phenomenon. Public Library of Science 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6040692/ /pubmed/29995879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199124 Text en © 2018 Withrow, Tarpy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Withrow, James M. Tarpy, David R. Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies |
title | Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies |
title_full | Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies |
title_fullStr | Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies |
title_full_unstemmed | Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies |
title_short | Cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies |
title_sort | cryptic “royal” subfamilies in honey bee (apis mellifera) colonies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT withrowjamesm crypticroyalsubfamiliesinhoneybeeapismelliferacolonies AT tarpydavidr crypticroyalsubfamiliesinhoneybeeapismelliferacolonies |