Cargando…

How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem

BACKGROUND: Assessment of people with dementia is challenging; with undetected and under treated symptoms and concerns resulting in avoidable distress, and few evidence-based interventions to support this. We aimed to understand the mechanisms of action of a measure to support comprehensive assessme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellis-Smith, Clare, Higginson, Irene J., Daveson, Barbara A., Henson, Lesley A., Evans, Catherine J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200240
_version_ 1783338888342798336
author Ellis-Smith, Clare
Higginson, Irene J.
Daveson, Barbara A.
Henson, Lesley A.
Evans, Catherine J.
author_facet Ellis-Smith, Clare
Higginson, Irene J.
Daveson, Barbara A.
Henson, Lesley A.
Evans, Catherine J.
author_sort Ellis-Smith, Clare
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of people with dementia is challenging; with undetected and under treated symptoms and concerns resulting in avoidable distress, and few evidence-based interventions to support this. We aimed to understand the mechanisms of action of a measure to support comprehensive assessment of people with dementia in care homes; and its acceptability, feasibility, and implementation requirements. METHODS: A qualitative study with an embedded quantitative component in three residential care homes, underpinned by an initial theoretical model of mechanisms of action. The measure, the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem), was introduced into the care of residents with dementia for 12 weeks. Qualitative data comprised focus groups and semi-structured interviews with family, care home staff, general practitioners and district nurses; and non-participant observations. Quantitative data comprised IPOS-Dem data. Directed content analysis for qualitative data, and descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data. FINDINGS: Key mechanisms of action were: improved observation and awareness of residents, collaborative assessment, comprehensive ‘picture of the person’, systematic record keeping, improved review and monitoring, care planning and changes to care provision, and facilitated multi-agency communication. Potential benefit included improved symptom management, improved comprehensive care, and increased family empowerment and engagement. IPOS-Dem was found to be acceptable and feasible. It was perceived as quick and easy to use, with proportion of overall missing data decreasing from 2.1% to 1.1% from baseline to final time points. ‘Trust’ in the measure was important; and leadership essential to ensure integration into care processes. CONCLUSIONS: In a population with complex care needs, with challenges to assessment and barriers to multi-agency working, a measure introduced into routine care is feasible and acceptable, and supports assessment and management of symptoms and concerns. A refined theoretical model demonstrating the likely mechanisms of action was developed. Further evaluation is required to test its effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6040756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60407562018-07-19 How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem Ellis-Smith, Clare Higginson, Irene J. Daveson, Barbara A. Henson, Lesley A. Evans, Catherine J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of people with dementia is challenging; with undetected and under treated symptoms and concerns resulting in avoidable distress, and few evidence-based interventions to support this. We aimed to understand the mechanisms of action of a measure to support comprehensive assessment of people with dementia in care homes; and its acceptability, feasibility, and implementation requirements. METHODS: A qualitative study with an embedded quantitative component in three residential care homes, underpinned by an initial theoretical model of mechanisms of action. The measure, the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem), was introduced into the care of residents with dementia for 12 weeks. Qualitative data comprised focus groups and semi-structured interviews with family, care home staff, general practitioners and district nurses; and non-participant observations. Quantitative data comprised IPOS-Dem data. Directed content analysis for qualitative data, and descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data. FINDINGS: Key mechanisms of action were: improved observation and awareness of residents, collaborative assessment, comprehensive ‘picture of the person’, systematic record keeping, improved review and monitoring, care planning and changes to care provision, and facilitated multi-agency communication. Potential benefit included improved symptom management, improved comprehensive care, and increased family empowerment and engagement. IPOS-Dem was found to be acceptable and feasible. It was perceived as quick and easy to use, with proportion of overall missing data decreasing from 2.1% to 1.1% from baseline to final time points. ‘Trust’ in the measure was important; and leadership essential to ensure integration into care processes. CONCLUSIONS: In a population with complex care needs, with challenges to assessment and barriers to multi-agency working, a measure introduced into routine care is feasible and acceptable, and supports assessment and management of symptoms and concerns. A refined theoretical model demonstrating the likely mechanisms of action was developed. Further evaluation is required to test its effectiveness. Public Library of Science 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6040756/ /pubmed/29995932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200240 Text en © 2018 Ellis-Smith et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ellis-Smith, Clare
Higginson, Irene J.
Daveson, Barbara A.
Henson, Lesley A.
Evans, Catherine J.
How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem
title How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem
title_full How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem
title_fullStr How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem
title_full_unstemmed How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem
title_short How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem
title_sort how can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? a mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of ipos-dem
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6040756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29995932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200240
work_keys_str_mv AT ellissmithclare howcanameasureimproveassessmentandmanagementofsymptomsandconcernsforpeoplewithdementiaincarehomesamixedmethodsfeasibilityandprocessevaluationofiposdem
AT higginsonirenej howcanameasureimproveassessmentandmanagementofsymptomsandconcernsforpeoplewithdementiaincarehomesamixedmethodsfeasibilityandprocessevaluationofiposdem
AT davesonbarbaraa howcanameasureimproveassessmentandmanagementofsymptomsandconcernsforpeoplewithdementiaincarehomesamixedmethodsfeasibilityandprocessevaluationofiposdem
AT hensonlesleya howcanameasureimproveassessmentandmanagementofsymptomsandconcernsforpeoplewithdementiaincarehomesamixedmethodsfeasibilityandprocessevaluationofiposdem
AT evanscatherinej howcanameasureimproveassessmentandmanagementofsymptomsandconcernsforpeoplewithdementiaincarehomesamixedmethodsfeasibilityandprocessevaluationofiposdem
AT howcanameasureimproveassessmentandmanagementofsymptomsandconcernsforpeoplewithdementiaincarehomesamixedmethodsfeasibilityandprocessevaluationofiposdem