Cargando…
Comparison of four scoring systems for risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the performances of the Glasgow–Blatchford Bleeding Score (GBS), pre-endoscopic Rockall score (PRS), complete Rockall score (CRS), and Cedars–Sinai Medical Center Predictive Index (CSMCPI) in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal...
Autores principales: | Tuncer, Hakan, Yardan, Turker, Akdemir, Hizir Ufuk, Ayyildiz, Talat |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6041537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034432 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.343.14956 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of the AIMS65 Score with Other Risk Stratification Scores in Upper Variceal and Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding
por: Alexandrino, Gonçalo, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Usefulness of the CHAMPS score for risk stratification in lower gastrointestinal bleeding
por: Tajika, Munehiko, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Rockall Score in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
por: Custovic, Nerma, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A Review of Risk Scores within Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
por: Orpen-Palmer, Josh, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Risk Stratification in Cancer Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65, and Development of a New Scoring System
por: Franco, Matheus Cavalcante, et al.
Publicado: (2022)