Cargando…

Infectious Diseases Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Injection Drug Use and Related Infections, United States, 2017

BACKGROUND: In the context of the opioid epidemic, injection drug use (IDU)–related infections are an escalating health issue for infectious diseases (ID) physicians in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods survey of the Infectious Diseases Society of America’s Emerging Infections...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rapoport, Alison B, Fischer, Leah S, Santibanez, Scott, Beekmann, Susan E, Polgreen, Philip M, Rowley, Christopher F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6041812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy132
_version_ 1783339051682627584
author Rapoport, Alison B
Fischer, Leah S
Santibanez, Scott
Beekmann, Susan E
Polgreen, Philip M
Rowley, Christopher F
author_facet Rapoport, Alison B
Fischer, Leah S
Santibanez, Scott
Beekmann, Susan E
Polgreen, Philip M
Rowley, Christopher F
author_sort Rapoport, Alison B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the context of the opioid epidemic, injection drug use (IDU)–related infections are an escalating health issue for infectious diseases (ID) physicians in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods survey of the Infectious Diseases Society of America’s Emerging Infections Network between February and April 2017 to evaluate perspectives relating to care of persons who inject drugs (PWID). Topics included the frequency of and management strategies for IDU-related infection, the availability of addiction services, and the evolving role of ID physicians in substance use disorder (SUD) management. RESULTS: More than half (53%, n = 672) of 1273 network members participated. Of these, 78% (n = 526) reported treating PWID. Infections frequently encountered included skin and soft tissue (62%, n = 324), bacteremia/fungemia (54%, n = 281), and endocarditis (50%, n = 263). In the past year, 79% (n = 416) reported that most IDU-related infections required ≥2 weeks of parenteral antibiotics; strategies frequently employed for prolonged treatment included completion of the entire course in the inpatient unit (41%, n = 218) or at another supervised facility (35%, n = 182). Only 35% (n = 184) of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that their health system offered comprehensive SUD management; 46% (n = 242) felt that ID providers should actively manage SUD. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of physicians surveyed treated PWID and reported myriad obstacles to providing care. Public health and health care systems should consider ways to support ID physicians caring for PWID, including (1) guidelines for providing complex care, including safe provision of multiweek parenteral antibiotics; (2) improved access to SUD management; and (3) strategies to assist those interested in roles in SUD management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6041812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60418122018-07-17 Infectious Diseases Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Injection Drug Use and Related Infections, United States, 2017 Rapoport, Alison B Fischer, Leah S Santibanez, Scott Beekmann, Susan E Polgreen, Philip M Rowley, Christopher F Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: In the context of the opioid epidemic, injection drug use (IDU)–related infections are an escalating health issue for infectious diseases (ID) physicians in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods survey of the Infectious Diseases Society of America’s Emerging Infections Network between February and April 2017 to evaluate perspectives relating to care of persons who inject drugs (PWID). Topics included the frequency of and management strategies for IDU-related infection, the availability of addiction services, and the evolving role of ID physicians in substance use disorder (SUD) management. RESULTS: More than half (53%, n = 672) of 1273 network members participated. Of these, 78% (n = 526) reported treating PWID. Infections frequently encountered included skin and soft tissue (62%, n = 324), bacteremia/fungemia (54%, n = 281), and endocarditis (50%, n = 263). In the past year, 79% (n = 416) reported that most IDU-related infections required ≥2 weeks of parenteral antibiotics; strategies frequently employed for prolonged treatment included completion of the entire course in the inpatient unit (41%, n = 218) or at another supervised facility (35%, n = 182). Only 35% (n = 184) of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that their health system offered comprehensive SUD management; 46% (n = 242) felt that ID providers should actively manage SUD. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of physicians surveyed treated PWID and reported myriad obstacles to providing care. Public health and health care systems should consider ways to support ID physicians caring for PWID, including (1) guidelines for providing complex care, including safe provision of multiweek parenteral antibiotics; (2) improved access to SUD management; and (3) strategies to assist those interested in roles in SUD management. Oxford University Press 2018-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6041812/ /pubmed/30018999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy132 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Rapoport, Alison B
Fischer, Leah S
Santibanez, Scott
Beekmann, Susan E
Polgreen, Philip M
Rowley, Christopher F
Infectious Diseases Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Injection Drug Use and Related Infections, United States, 2017
title Infectious Diseases Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Injection Drug Use and Related Infections, United States, 2017
title_full Infectious Diseases Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Injection Drug Use and Related Infections, United States, 2017
title_fullStr Infectious Diseases Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Injection Drug Use and Related Infections, United States, 2017
title_full_unstemmed Infectious Diseases Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Injection Drug Use and Related Infections, United States, 2017
title_short Infectious Diseases Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Injection Drug Use and Related Infections, United States, 2017
title_sort infectious diseases physicians’ perspectives regarding injection drug use and related infections, united states, 2017
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6041812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy132
work_keys_str_mv AT rapoportalisonb infectiousdiseasesphysiciansperspectivesregardinginjectiondruguseandrelatedinfectionsunitedstates2017
AT fischerleahs infectiousdiseasesphysiciansperspectivesregardinginjectiondruguseandrelatedinfectionsunitedstates2017
AT santibanezscott infectiousdiseasesphysiciansperspectivesregardinginjectiondruguseandrelatedinfectionsunitedstates2017
AT beekmannsusane infectiousdiseasesphysiciansperspectivesregardinginjectiondruguseandrelatedinfectionsunitedstates2017
AT polgreenphilipm infectiousdiseasesphysiciansperspectivesregardinginjectiondruguseandrelatedinfectionsunitedstates2017
AT rowleychristopherf infectiousdiseasesphysiciansperspectivesregardinginjectiondruguseandrelatedinfectionsunitedstates2017