Cargando…

Hemoglobin spray as adjunct therapy in complex wounds: Meta-analysis versus standard care alone in pooled data by wound type across three retrospective cohort controlled evaluations

OBJECTIVES: Low tissue oxygenation is a predictor of healing outcomes in complex wounds. Adjunct hemoglobin to aid oxygen diffusion has been demonstrated to achieve superior healing outcomes; however, the relative healing benefit across different wound types and evaluations has not yet been estimate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elg, Fredrik, Hunt, Sharon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6041853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118784313
_version_ 1783339060621737984
author Elg, Fredrik
Hunt, Sharon
author_facet Elg, Fredrik
Hunt, Sharon
author_sort Elg, Fredrik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Low tissue oxygenation is a predictor of healing outcomes in complex wounds. Adjunct hemoglobin to aid oxygen diffusion has been demonstrated to achieve superior healing outcomes; however, the relative healing benefit across different wound types and evaluations has not yet been estimated. This article does this for the first time. METHODS: Data were pooled from previously published real world controlled evaluations, three retrospective cohort controlled studies of a variety of wounds within standard care across hospital and primary care in the North of England in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (n = 40), chronic wounds (n = 100), and sloughy wounds (n = 200). Wounds were equally distributed between adjunct hemoglobin and control and the hemoglobin spray was used as per instructions for use and applied twice weekly, mostly for the duration of the wounds in all three evaluations. Wound healing over 26 weeks was the primary outcome in each of the evaluations, with additional healing and quality of life indicators including pain, wound size, slough coverage, wound exudate levels, adverse events, and dressing regimen used, over time. Each wound type with 10 or more patients in both the standard care alone and adjunctive hemoglobin groups (n = 257/73% of patients) was evaluated. RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards log-rank regressions demonstrated significantly higher weekly chance of healing in each wound type (β, 95% range, sample, p): trauma 1.55 (1.23–1.96, n = 110, p < 0.001), diabetic foot ulcers 2.39 (1.52–3.75, n = 60, p = 0.01), venous leg ulcers 4.98 (1.69–14.7, n = 33, p = 0.04), burns 1.82 (1.11–2.99, n = 30, p = 0.02), and post-surgical wounds 2.75 (1.53–4.96, n = 24, p = 0.001). Results on additional healing indicators were consistent with the main findings. Notably, controlling for ischemia in diabetic foot ulcers resulted in an increased β of 5.68 (2.33–13.86, n = 29, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adjunct hemoglobin spray, when implemented within standard care, is likely to achieve substantial healing benefits to patients, in particular for diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and post-surgical wounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6041853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60418532018-07-16 Hemoglobin spray as adjunct therapy in complex wounds: Meta-analysis versus standard care alone in pooled data by wound type across three retrospective cohort controlled evaluations Elg, Fredrik Hunt, Sharon SAGE Open Med Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: Low tissue oxygenation is a predictor of healing outcomes in complex wounds. Adjunct hemoglobin to aid oxygen diffusion has been demonstrated to achieve superior healing outcomes; however, the relative healing benefit across different wound types and evaluations has not yet been estimated. This article does this for the first time. METHODS: Data were pooled from previously published real world controlled evaluations, three retrospective cohort controlled studies of a variety of wounds within standard care across hospital and primary care in the North of England in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (n = 40), chronic wounds (n = 100), and sloughy wounds (n = 200). Wounds were equally distributed between adjunct hemoglobin and control and the hemoglobin spray was used as per instructions for use and applied twice weekly, mostly for the duration of the wounds in all three evaluations. Wound healing over 26 weeks was the primary outcome in each of the evaluations, with additional healing and quality of life indicators including pain, wound size, slough coverage, wound exudate levels, adverse events, and dressing regimen used, over time. Each wound type with 10 or more patients in both the standard care alone and adjunctive hemoglobin groups (n = 257/73% of patients) was evaluated. RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards log-rank regressions demonstrated significantly higher weekly chance of healing in each wound type (β, 95% range, sample, p): trauma 1.55 (1.23–1.96, n = 110, p < 0.001), diabetic foot ulcers 2.39 (1.52–3.75, n = 60, p = 0.01), venous leg ulcers 4.98 (1.69–14.7, n = 33, p = 0.04), burns 1.82 (1.11–2.99, n = 30, p = 0.02), and post-surgical wounds 2.75 (1.53–4.96, n = 24, p = 0.001). Results on additional healing indicators were consistent with the main findings. Notably, controlling for ischemia in diabetic foot ulcers resulted in an increased β of 5.68 (2.33–13.86, n = 29, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adjunct hemoglobin spray, when implemented within standard care, is likely to achieve substantial healing benefits to patients, in particular for diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and post-surgical wounds. SAGE Publications 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6041853/ /pubmed/30013783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118784313 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Elg, Fredrik
Hunt, Sharon
Hemoglobin spray as adjunct therapy in complex wounds: Meta-analysis versus standard care alone in pooled data by wound type across three retrospective cohort controlled evaluations
title Hemoglobin spray as adjunct therapy in complex wounds: Meta-analysis versus standard care alone in pooled data by wound type across three retrospective cohort controlled evaluations
title_full Hemoglobin spray as adjunct therapy in complex wounds: Meta-analysis versus standard care alone in pooled data by wound type across three retrospective cohort controlled evaluations
title_fullStr Hemoglobin spray as adjunct therapy in complex wounds: Meta-analysis versus standard care alone in pooled data by wound type across three retrospective cohort controlled evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Hemoglobin spray as adjunct therapy in complex wounds: Meta-analysis versus standard care alone in pooled data by wound type across three retrospective cohort controlled evaluations
title_short Hemoglobin spray as adjunct therapy in complex wounds: Meta-analysis versus standard care alone in pooled data by wound type across three retrospective cohort controlled evaluations
title_sort hemoglobin spray as adjunct therapy in complex wounds: meta-analysis versus standard care alone in pooled data by wound type across three retrospective cohort controlled evaluations
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6041853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118784313
work_keys_str_mv AT elgfredrik hemoglobinsprayasadjuncttherapyincomplexwoundsmetaanalysisversusstandardcarealoneinpooleddatabywoundtypeacrossthreeretrospectivecohortcontrolledevaluations
AT huntsharon hemoglobinsprayasadjuncttherapyincomplexwoundsmetaanalysisversusstandardcarealoneinpooleddatabywoundtypeacrossthreeretrospectivecohortcontrolledevaluations