Cargando…
A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction and its surgical treatment remain a controversial topic in spine surgery. Determining success after SIJ fusion may be difficult due to preexisting back pain, lumbar fusion (LF), and functional disability. We examine the utility of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7549 |
_version_ | 1783339087296462848 |
---|---|
author | Mao, Gordon Aldahak, Nouman Kusyk, Dorian Yeager, Matthew Cook, Daniel Cameron, Jeffrey Cheng, Boyle Oh, Michael |
author_facet | Mao, Gordon Aldahak, Nouman Kusyk, Dorian Yeager, Matthew Cook, Daniel Cameron, Jeffrey Cheng, Boyle Oh, Michael |
author_sort | Mao, Gordon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction and its surgical treatment remain a controversial topic in spine surgery. Determining success after SIJ fusion may be difficult due to preexisting back pain, lumbar fusion (LF), and functional disability. We examine the utility of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as a measure of clinical outcomes after minimally invasive SIJ fusion. A retrospective review of 24 patients with at least 12- months follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on presence of previous LF. Their post-operative ODI was compared with overall satisfaction, pain reduction, and return to work status. No difference in demographics was found in patients with and without prior LF with 92% of patients reporting lower post-operative pain and 96% being satisfied. Presence of LF did not show any statistically significant differences in pain or satisfaction. However, patient with prior LF reported lower ODI than those without LF at 1-year post-operatively (P=0.015). Postoperative ODI may give a falsely pessimistic impression of outcomes in SIJ fusion patients with prior LF, and its use and limitations should be carefully considered in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6042050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60420502018-07-27 A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion Mao, Gordon Aldahak, Nouman Kusyk, Dorian Yeager, Matthew Cook, Daniel Cameron, Jeffrey Cheng, Boyle Oh, Michael Orthop Rev (Pavia) Article Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction and its surgical treatment remain a controversial topic in spine surgery. Determining success after SIJ fusion may be difficult due to preexisting back pain, lumbar fusion (LF), and functional disability. We examine the utility of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as a measure of clinical outcomes after minimally invasive SIJ fusion. A retrospective review of 24 patients with at least 12- months follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on presence of previous LF. Their post-operative ODI was compared with overall satisfaction, pain reduction, and return to work status. No difference in demographics was found in patients with and without prior LF with 92% of patients reporting lower post-operative pain and 96% being satisfied. Presence of LF did not show any statistically significant differences in pain or satisfaction. However, patient with prior LF reported lower ODI than those without LF at 1-year post-operatively (P=0.015). Postoperative ODI may give a falsely pessimistic impression of outcomes in SIJ fusion patients with prior LF, and its use and limitations should be carefully considered in future studies. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6042050/ /pubmed/30057723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7549 Text en ©Copyright G. Mao et al., 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Mao, Gordon Aldahak, Nouman Kusyk, Dorian Yeager, Matthew Cook, Daniel Cameron, Jeffrey Cheng, Boyle Oh, Michael A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion |
title | A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion |
title_full | A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion |
title_fullStr | A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion |
title_short | A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion |
title_sort | consideration for the utility of the post-operative oswestry disability index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7549 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maogordon aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT aldahaknouman aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT kusykdorian aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT yeagermatthew aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT cookdaniel aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT cameronjeffrey aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT chengboyle aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT ohmichael aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT maogordon considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT aldahaknouman considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT kusykdorian considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT yeagermatthew considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT cookdaniel considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT cameronjeffrey considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT chengboyle considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion AT ohmichael considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion |