Cargando…

A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction and its surgical treatment remain a controversial topic in spine surgery. Determining success after SIJ fusion may be difficult due to preexisting back pain, lumbar fusion (LF), and functional disability. We examine the utility of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mao, Gordon, Aldahak, Nouman, Kusyk, Dorian, Yeager, Matthew, Cook, Daniel, Cameron, Jeffrey, Cheng, Boyle, Oh, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7549
_version_ 1783339087296462848
author Mao, Gordon
Aldahak, Nouman
Kusyk, Dorian
Yeager, Matthew
Cook, Daniel
Cameron, Jeffrey
Cheng, Boyle
Oh, Michael
author_facet Mao, Gordon
Aldahak, Nouman
Kusyk, Dorian
Yeager, Matthew
Cook, Daniel
Cameron, Jeffrey
Cheng, Boyle
Oh, Michael
author_sort Mao, Gordon
collection PubMed
description Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction and its surgical treatment remain a controversial topic in spine surgery. Determining success after SIJ fusion may be difficult due to preexisting back pain, lumbar fusion (LF), and functional disability. We examine the utility of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as a measure of clinical outcomes after minimally invasive SIJ fusion. A retrospective review of 24 patients with at least 12- months follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on presence of previous LF. Their post-operative ODI was compared with overall satisfaction, pain reduction, and return to work status. No difference in demographics was found in patients with and without prior LF with 92% of patients reporting lower post-operative pain and 96% being satisfied. Presence of LF did not show any statistically significant differences in pain or satisfaction. However, patient with prior LF reported lower ODI than those without LF at 1-year post-operatively (P=0.015). Postoperative ODI may give a falsely pessimistic impression of outcomes in SIJ fusion patients with prior LF, and its use and limitations should be carefully considered in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60420502018-07-27 A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion Mao, Gordon Aldahak, Nouman Kusyk, Dorian Yeager, Matthew Cook, Daniel Cameron, Jeffrey Cheng, Boyle Oh, Michael Orthop Rev (Pavia) Article Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction and its surgical treatment remain a controversial topic in spine surgery. Determining success after SIJ fusion may be difficult due to preexisting back pain, lumbar fusion (LF), and functional disability. We examine the utility of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as a measure of clinical outcomes after minimally invasive SIJ fusion. A retrospective review of 24 patients with at least 12- months follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on presence of previous LF. Their post-operative ODI was compared with overall satisfaction, pain reduction, and return to work status. No difference in demographics was found in patients with and without prior LF with 92% of patients reporting lower post-operative pain and 96% being satisfied. Presence of LF did not show any statistically significant differences in pain or satisfaction. However, patient with prior LF reported lower ODI than those without LF at 1-year post-operatively (P=0.015). Postoperative ODI may give a falsely pessimistic impression of outcomes in SIJ fusion patients with prior LF, and its use and limitations should be carefully considered in future studies. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6042050/ /pubmed/30057723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7549 Text en ©Copyright G. Mao et al., 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Mao, Gordon
Aldahak, Nouman
Kusyk, Dorian
Yeager, Matthew
Cook, Daniel
Cameron, Jeffrey
Cheng, Boyle
Oh, Michael
A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion
title A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion
title_full A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion
title_fullStr A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion
title_full_unstemmed A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion
title_short A consideration for the utility of the post-operative Oswestry Disability Index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion
title_sort consideration for the utility of the post-operative oswestry disability index for measuring outcomes after sacroiliac joint fusion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7549
work_keys_str_mv AT maogordon aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT aldahaknouman aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT kusykdorian aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT yeagermatthew aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT cookdaniel aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT cameronjeffrey aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT chengboyle aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT ohmichael aconsiderationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT maogordon considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT aldahaknouman considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT kusykdorian considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT yeagermatthew considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT cookdaniel considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT cameronjeffrey considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT chengboyle considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion
AT ohmichael considerationfortheutilityofthepostoperativeoswestrydisabilityindexformeasuringoutcomesaftersacroiliacjointfusion