Cargando…

Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to establish ventral glans length (VGL), meatus (M) size, and their ratio VGL/M (R) in normal Indian boys and to compare these with the respective equivalent dimensions in boys with distal and mid-penile hypospadias using anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Normal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhua, Anjan Kumar, Anand, Sachit, Agarwala, Sandeep, Bhatnagar, Veereshwar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050263
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_151_17
_version_ 1783339098832896000
author Dhua, Anjan Kumar
Anand, Sachit
Agarwala, Sandeep
Bhatnagar, Veereshwar
author_facet Dhua, Anjan Kumar
Anand, Sachit
Agarwala, Sandeep
Bhatnagar, Veereshwar
author_sort Dhua, Anjan Kumar
collection PubMed
description AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to establish ventral glans length (VGL), meatus (M) size, and their ratio VGL/M (R) in normal Indian boys and to compare these with the respective equivalent dimensions in boys with distal and mid-penile hypospadias using anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Normal boys were designated as Group A (n = 108), and the boys with hypospadias were designated as Group B (n = 81). The anatomical landmarks marked on the glans were measured using a digital camera and appropriate software. RESULTS: The mean age of the boys in Groups A and B was 4.26 ± 3.59 (range 0.5–12) and 3.82 ± 2.85 (0.7–11) years, respectively. The observed mean values in Group A for VGL-A, M-A, and R-A were 3.05 ± 1.27 (range 1.19–8.09), 4.3 ± 1.23 (range 1.61–7.04), and 0.8 ± 0.45 (range 0.27–2.1) mm, respectively. The observed mean values in Group B for VGL-B, M-B, and R-B were 3.77 ± 0.81 (range 12.41–5.2), 3.27 ± 0.71 (range 2.25–5.34), and 1.17 ± 0.26 (range 0.84–1.86) mm, respectively. Comparison of R-A and R-B showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The dimensions and the studied ratio between a hypospadiac glans and a normal glans differed significantly. The ratio between VGL and M was 0.8 in normal boys. In comparison, the ratio between the equivalent VGL and M in the hypospadiac boys was 1.17. During glansplasty in surgery for hypospadias, this factor should be taken into consideration to avoid the creation of long and tight ventral glans closure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60421692018-07-26 Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans Dhua, Anjan Kumar Anand, Sachit Agarwala, Sandeep Bhatnagar, Veereshwar J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to establish ventral glans length (VGL), meatus (M) size, and their ratio VGL/M (R) in normal Indian boys and to compare these with the respective equivalent dimensions in boys with distal and mid-penile hypospadias using anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Normal boys were designated as Group A (n = 108), and the boys with hypospadias were designated as Group B (n = 81). The anatomical landmarks marked on the glans were measured using a digital camera and appropriate software. RESULTS: The mean age of the boys in Groups A and B was 4.26 ± 3.59 (range 0.5–12) and 3.82 ± 2.85 (0.7–11) years, respectively. The observed mean values in Group A for VGL-A, M-A, and R-A were 3.05 ± 1.27 (range 1.19–8.09), 4.3 ± 1.23 (range 1.61–7.04), and 0.8 ± 0.45 (range 0.27–2.1) mm, respectively. The observed mean values in Group B for VGL-B, M-B, and R-B were 3.77 ± 0.81 (range 12.41–5.2), 3.27 ± 0.71 (range 2.25–5.34), and 1.17 ± 0.26 (range 0.84–1.86) mm, respectively. Comparison of R-A and R-B showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The dimensions and the studied ratio between a hypospadiac glans and a normal glans differed significantly. The ratio between VGL and M was 0.8 in normal boys. In comparison, the ratio between the equivalent VGL and M in the hypospadiac boys was 1.17. During glansplasty in surgery for hypospadias, this factor should be taken into consideration to avoid the creation of long and tight ventral glans closure. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6042169/ /pubmed/30050263 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_151_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dhua, Anjan Kumar
Anand, Sachit
Agarwala, Sandeep
Bhatnagar, Veereshwar
Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans
title Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans
title_full Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans
title_fullStr Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans
title_short Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans
title_sort comparison of anatomical landmarks and dimensions in a hypospadiac glans with those of a normal glans
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050263
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_151_17
work_keys_str_mv AT dhuaanjankumar comparisonofanatomicallandmarksanddimensionsinahypospadiacglanswiththoseofanormalglans
AT anandsachit comparisonofanatomicallandmarksanddimensionsinahypospadiacglanswiththoseofanormalglans
AT agarwalasandeep comparisonofanatomicallandmarksanddimensionsinahypospadiacglanswiththoseofanormalglans
AT bhatnagarveereshwar comparisonofanatomicallandmarksanddimensionsinahypospadiacglanswiththoseofanormalglans