Cargando…
Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans
AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to establish ventral glans length (VGL), meatus (M) size, and their ratio VGL/M (R) in normal Indian boys and to compare these with the respective equivalent dimensions in boys with distal and mid-penile hypospadias using anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Normal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050263 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_151_17 |
_version_ | 1783339098832896000 |
---|---|
author | Dhua, Anjan Kumar Anand, Sachit Agarwala, Sandeep Bhatnagar, Veereshwar |
author_facet | Dhua, Anjan Kumar Anand, Sachit Agarwala, Sandeep Bhatnagar, Veereshwar |
author_sort | Dhua, Anjan Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to establish ventral glans length (VGL), meatus (M) size, and their ratio VGL/M (R) in normal Indian boys and to compare these with the respective equivalent dimensions in boys with distal and mid-penile hypospadias using anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Normal boys were designated as Group A (n = 108), and the boys with hypospadias were designated as Group B (n = 81). The anatomical landmarks marked on the glans were measured using a digital camera and appropriate software. RESULTS: The mean age of the boys in Groups A and B was 4.26 ± 3.59 (range 0.5–12) and 3.82 ± 2.85 (0.7–11) years, respectively. The observed mean values in Group A for VGL-A, M-A, and R-A were 3.05 ± 1.27 (range 1.19–8.09), 4.3 ± 1.23 (range 1.61–7.04), and 0.8 ± 0.45 (range 0.27–2.1) mm, respectively. The observed mean values in Group B for VGL-B, M-B, and R-B were 3.77 ± 0.81 (range 12.41–5.2), 3.27 ± 0.71 (range 2.25–5.34), and 1.17 ± 0.26 (range 0.84–1.86) mm, respectively. Comparison of R-A and R-B showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The dimensions and the studied ratio between a hypospadiac glans and a normal glans differed significantly. The ratio between VGL and M was 0.8 in normal boys. In comparison, the ratio between the equivalent VGL and M in the hypospadiac boys was 1.17. During glansplasty in surgery for hypospadias, this factor should be taken into consideration to avoid the creation of long and tight ventral glans closure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6042169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60421692018-07-26 Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans Dhua, Anjan Kumar Anand, Sachit Agarwala, Sandeep Bhatnagar, Veereshwar J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study is to establish ventral glans length (VGL), meatus (M) size, and their ratio VGL/M (R) in normal Indian boys and to compare these with the respective equivalent dimensions in boys with distal and mid-penile hypospadias using anatomic landmarks. METHODS: Normal boys were designated as Group A (n = 108), and the boys with hypospadias were designated as Group B (n = 81). The anatomical landmarks marked on the glans were measured using a digital camera and appropriate software. RESULTS: The mean age of the boys in Groups A and B was 4.26 ± 3.59 (range 0.5–12) and 3.82 ± 2.85 (0.7–11) years, respectively. The observed mean values in Group A for VGL-A, M-A, and R-A were 3.05 ± 1.27 (range 1.19–8.09), 4.3 ± 1.23 (range 1.61–7.04), and 0.8 ± 0.45 (range 0.27–2.1) mm, respectively. The observed mean values in Group B for VGL-B, M-B, and R-B were 3.77 ± 0.81 (range 12.41–5.2), 3.27 ± 0.71 (range 2.25–5.34), and 1.17 ± 0.26 (range 0.84–1.86) mm, respectively. Comparison of R-A and R-B showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The dimensions and the studied ratio between a hypospadiac glans and a normal glans differed significantly. The ratio between VGL and M was 0.8 in normal boys. In comparison, the ratio between the equivalent VGL and M in the hypospadiac boys was 1.17. During glansplasty in surgery for hypospadias, this factor should be taken into consideration to avoid the creation of long and tight ventral glans closure. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6042169/ /pubmed/30050263 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_151_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dhua, Anjan Kumar Anand, Sachit Agarwala, Sandeep Bhatnagar, Veereshwar Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans |
title | Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans |
title_full | Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans |
title_short | Comparison of Anatomical Landmarks and Dimensions in a Hypospadiac Glans with Those of a Normal Glans |
title_sort | comparison of anatomical landmarks and dimensions in a hypospadiac glans with those of a normal glans |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050263 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_151_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhuaanjankumar comparisonofanatomicallandmarksanddimensionsinahypospadiacglanswiththoseofanormalglans AT anandsachit comparisonofanatomicallandmarksanddimensionsinahypospadiacglanswiththoseofanormalglans AT agarwalasandeep comparisonofanatomicallandmarksanddimensionsinahypospadiacglanswiththoseofanormalglans AT bhatnagarveereshwar comparisonofanatomicallandmarksanddimensionsinahypospadiacglanswiththoseofanormalglans |