Cargando…

Revision Surgery in the Management of Anorectal Malformations: Experience from a Tertiary Center of India

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the significant advancements in the management of anorectal malformations (ARMs), there are various surgical and functional complications reported. Complications are closely related with the surgical techniques adopted and the types of malformations. In this article, we p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Basant, Upadhyaya, Vijai Dutta, Gupta, Manish Kumar, Kishore, Srinivasa, Nijagal Mutt, J. B., Yadav, Rajanikant, Kumar, Sheo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050264
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_140_17
_version_ 1783339100440363008
author Kumar, Basant
Upadhyaya, Vijai Dutta
Gupta, Manish Kumar
Kishore, Srinivasa
Nijagal Mutt, J. B.
Yadav, Rajanikant
Kumar, Sheo
author_facet Kumar, Basant
Upadhyaya, Vijai Dutta
Gupta, Manish Kumar
Kishore, Srinivasa
Nijagal Mutt, J. B.
Yadav, Rajanikant
Kumar, Sheo
author_sort Kumar, Basant
collection PubMed
description AIM AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the significant advancements in the management of anorectal malformations (ARMs), there are various surgical and functional complications reported. Complications are closely related with the surgical techniques adopted and the types of malformations. In this article, we present our experiences with ARM patients who required reoperation after unsuccessful previous surgeries or who had developed complications related to the previous surgical techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and electronic records of all the patients with ARM who were operated for ARMs in our institute from June 2010 to May 2016. All ARM patients who needed reoperation were included in the study. These patients were previously operated outside our institute and referred to us with ongoing problems of constipation, stool impaction with overflow incontinence, perineal soiling, and difficult urination. RESULTS: There were 31 patients (M:F = 2.1:1) of ARM, reoperated for 38 indications during the above-mentioned period. Five patients had more than one problem. Presentation included neoanal stenosis (11), complete obliteration of neoanus (2), malpositioned neoanus (2), persistent/recurrent rectourethral fistula (3), iatrogenic rectovaginal fistula (4), rectal prolapse (5), large widened neoanus with soiling (2), and urethral stricture (2), which required revision interventions. Six patients had megarectum. All patients showed improvement in their symptoms after revision surgery, but 10 (41.7%) patients required further regular bowel management program (BMP) to avoid the soiling and constipation. Fourteen (58.3%) patients stayed clean without regular BMP. CONCLUSION: All these complications had clear explanations and are well described in the literature. Revision surgery in such patients had fair outcome, but some sort of BMP was required. Both posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and anterior sagittal anorectoplasty are excellent techniques for revision surgery with few simple modifications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60421762018-07-26 Revision Surgery in the Management of Anorectal Malformations: Experience from a Tertiary Center of India Kumar, Basant Upadhyaya, Vijai Dutta Gupta, Manish Kumar Kishore, Srinivasa Nijagal Mutt, J. B. Yadav, Rajanikant Kumar, Sheo J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the significant advancements in the management of anorectal malformations (ARMs), there are various surgical and functional complications reported. Complications are closely related with the surgical techniques adopted and the types of malformations. In this article, we present our experiences with ARM patients who required reoperation after unsuccessful previous surgeries or who had developed complications related to the previous surgical techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and electronic records of all the patients with ARM who were operated for ARMs in our institute from June 2010 to May 2016. All ARM patients who needed reoperation were included in the study. These patients were previously operated outside our institute and referred to us with ongoing problems of constipation, stool impaction with overflow incontinence, perineal soiling, and difficult urination. RESULTS: There were 31 patients (M:F = 2.1:1) of ARM, reoperated for 38 indications during the above-mentioned period. Five patients had more than one problem. Presentation included neoanal stenosis (11), complete obliteration of neoanus (2), malpositioned neoanus (2), persistent/recurrent rectourethral fistula (3), iatrogenic rectovaginal fistula (4), rectal prolapse (5), large widened neoanus with soiling (2), and urethral stricture (2), which required revision interventions. Six patients had megarectum. All patients showed improvement in their symptoms after revision surgery, but 10 (41.7%) patients required further regular bowel management program (BMP) to avoid the soiling and constipation. Fourteen (58.3%) patients stayed clean without regular BMP. CONCLUSION: All these complications had clear explanations and are well described in the literature. Revision surgery in such patients had fair outcome, but some sort of BMP was required. Both posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and anterior sagittal anorectoplasty are excellent techniques for revision surgery with few simple modifications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6042176/ /pubmed/30050264 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_140_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Basant
Upadhyaya, Vijai Dutta
Gupta, Manish Kumar
Kishore, Srinivasa
Nijagal Mutt, J. B.
Yadav, Rajanikant
Kumar, Sheo
Revision Surgery in the Management of Anorectal Malformations: Experience from a Tertiary Center of India
title Revision Surgery in the Management of Anorectal Malformations: Experience from a Tertiary Center of India
title_full Revision Surgery in the Management of Anorectal Malformations: Experience from a Tertiary Center of India
title_fullStr Revision Surgery in the Management of Anorectal Malformations: Experience from a Tertiary Center of India
title_full_unstemmed Revision Surgery in the Management of Anorectal Malformations: Experience from a Tertiary Center of India
title_short Revision Surgery in the Management of Anorectal Malformations: Experience from a Tertiary Center of India
title_sort revision surgery in the management of anorectal malformations: experience from a tertiary center of india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050264
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_140_17
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarbasant revisionsurgeryinthemanagementofanorectalmalformationsexperiencefromatertiarycenterofindia
AT upadhyayavijaidutta revisionsurgeryinthemanagementofanorectalmalformationsexperiencefromatertiarycenterofindia
AT guptamanishkumar revisionsurgeryinthemanagementofanorectalmalformationsexperiencefromatertiarycenterofindia
AT kishoresrinivasa revisionsurgeryinthemanagementofanorectalmalformationsexperiencefromatertiarycenterofindia
AT nijagalmuttjb revisionsurgeryinthemanagementofanorectalmalformationsexperiencefromatertiarycenterofindia
AT yadavrajanikant revisionsurgeryinthemanagementofanorectalmalformationsexperiencefromatertiarycenterofindia
AT kumarsheo revisionsurgeryinthemanagementofanorectalmalformationsexperiencefromatertiarycenterofindia