Cargando…

Performance of 6 HCV genotyping 9G test for HCV genotyping in clinical samples

BACKGROUND: A treatment of HCV infection depends on the genotype and sub-genotype. Therefore, accurate HCV genotyping is critical for selecting the appropriate treatment regimen. METHOD: This study included 280 plasma samples to evaluate the performance of 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test. The performance o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warkad, Shrikant Dasharath, Nimse, Satish Balasaheb, Song, Keum-Soo, Chantratita, Wasun, Pongthanapisith, Viroj, Nawale, Laxman Uddhav, Kim, Taisun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1017-4
_version_ 1783339129064390656
author Warkad, Shrikant Dasharath
Nimse, Satish Balasaheb
Song, Keum-Soo
Chantratita, Wasun
Pongthanapisith, Viroj
Nawale, Laxman Uddhav
Kim, Taisun
author_facet Warkad, Shrikant Dasharath
Nimse, Satish Balasaheb
Song, Keum-Soo
Chantratita, Wasun
Pongthanapisith, Viroj
Nawale, Laxman Uddhav
Kim, Taisun
author_sort Warkad, Shrikant Dasharath
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A treatment of HCV infection depends on the genotype and sub-genotype. Therefore, accurate HCV genotyping is critical for selecting the appropriate treatment regimen. METHOD: This study included 280 plasma samples to evaluate the performance of 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test. The performance of 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test for accurate detection of HCV 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4, and 6 genotypes was evaluated by comparing it with LiPA 2.0 assay and sequencing. RESULTS: 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test and LiPA 2.0 assay demonstrated 83.9% (n = 235) agreement. 39/45 samples that showed discrepant results between the two tests were analyzed by sequencing. Sequencing genotyped 39 discrepant samples as 0 (HCV 1a), 24 (HCV 1b), 1 (HCV 6f), 12 (HCV 6i), and 2 (HCV-negative). Results of 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test were very similar to the sequencing as it detected 1, 23, 1, 12, and 2 samples as HCV 1a, 1b, 3 & 6a or 6f, 6i or 6n, and negative, respectively. However, LiPA 2.0 assay showed complete disagreement with sequencing, as it did not detect any of these 39 samples correctly. These results indicate that LiPA 2.0 assay has limitations in identifying HCV genotypes 1b, and 6. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test were 99.5, 98.8, 99.5, and 98.8%, respectively. It is important to note that HCV Genotyping 9G test showed 98.3 and 100% sensitivity for HCV 1b and 6 genotyping, respectively. However, LiPA 2.0 assay demonstrated 57.9 and 71.7% sensitivity for these genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test identifies HCV 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 6 with good agreement with sequencing. Hence, 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test has a high clinical value because it can provide critical information to physicians and assist them to use the correct drug for efficient hepatitis C treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12985-018-1017-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60423302018-07-13 Performance of 6 HCV genotyping 9G test for HCV genotyping in clinical samples Warkad, Shrikant Dasharath Nimse, Satish Balasaheb Song, Keum-Soo Chantratita, Wasun Pongthanapisith, Viroj Nawale, Laxman Uddhav Kim, Taisun Virol J Research BACKGROUND: A treatment of HCV infection depends on the genotype and sub-genotype. Therefore, accurate HCV genotyping is critical for selecting the appropriate treatment regimen. METHOD: This study included 280 plasma samples to evaluate the performance of 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test. The performance of 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test for accurate detection of HCV 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4, and 6 genotypes was evaluated by comparing it with LiPA 2.0 assay and sequencing. RESULTS: 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test and LiPA 2.0 assay demonstrated 83.9% (n = 235) agreement. 39/45 samples that showed discrepant results between the two tests were analyzed by sequencing. Sequencing genotyped 39 discrepant samples as 0 (HCV 1a), 24 (HCV 1b), 1 (HCV 6f), 12 (HCV 6i), and 2 (HCV-negative). Results of 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test were very similar to the sequencing as it detected 1, 23, 1, 12, and 2 samples as HCV 1a, 1b, 3 & 6a or 6f, 6i or 6n, and negative, respectively. However, LiPA 2.0 assay showed complete disagreement with sequencing, as it did not detect any of these 39 samples correctly. These results indicate that LiPA 2.0 assay has limitations in identifying HCV genotypes 1b, and 6. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test were 99.5, 98.8, 99.5, and 98.8%, respectively. It is important to note that HCV Genotyping 9G test showed 98.3 and 100% sensitivity for HCV 1b and 6 genotyping, respectively. However, LiPA 2.0 assay demonstrated 57.9 and 71.7% sensitivity for these genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test identifies HCV 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 6 with good agreement with sequencing. Hence, 6 HCV Genotyping 9G test has a high clinical value because it can provide critical information to physicians and assist them to use the correct drug for efficient hepatitis C treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12985-018-1017-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6042330/ /pubmed/29996859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1017-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Warkad, Shrikant Dasharath
Nimse, Satish Balasaheb
Song, Keum-Soo
Chantratita, Wasun
Pongthanapisith, Viroj
Nawale, Laxman Uddhav
Kim, Taisun
Performance of 6 HCV genotyping 9G test for HCV genotyping in clinical samples
title Performance of 6 HCV genotyping 9G test for HCV genotyping in clinical samples
title_full Performance of 6 HCV genotyping 9G test for HCV genotyping in clinical samples
title_fullStr Performance of 6 HCV genotyping 9G test for HCV genotyping in clinical samples
title_full_unstemmed Performance of 6 HCV genotyping 9G test for HCV genotyping in clinical samples
title_short Performance of 6 HCV genotyping 9G test for HCV genotyping in clinical samples
title_sort performance of 6 hcv genotyping 9g test for hcv genotyping in clinical samples
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1017-4
work_keys_str_mv AT warkadshrikantdasharath performanceof6hcvgenotyping9gtestforhcvgenotypinginclinicalsamples
AT nimsesatishbalasaheb performanceof6hcvgenotyping9gtestforhcvgenotypinginclinicalsamples
AT songkeumsoo performanceof6hcvgenotyping9gtestforhcvgenotypinginclinicalsamples
AT chantratitawasun performanceof6hcvgenotyping9gtestforhcvgenotypinginclinicalsamples
AT pongthanapisithviroj performanceof6hcvgenotyping9gtestforhcvgenotypinginclinicalsamples
AT nawalelaxmanuddhav performanceof6hcvgenotyping9gtestforhcvgenotypinginclinicalsamples
AT kimtaisun performanceof6hcvgenotyping9gtestforhcvgenotypinginclinicalsamples