Cargando…

Radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of pelvic radiographs versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints in children with suspected sacroiliitis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of children with suspected or confirmed spondyloarthritis wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiss, Pamela F., Xiao, Rui, Brandon, Timothy G., Biko, David M., Maksymowych, Walter P., Lambert, Robert G., Jaremko, Jacob L., Chauvin, Nancy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1642-8
_version_ 1783339134934319104
author Weiss, Pamela F.
Xiao, Rui
Brandon, Timothy G.
Biko, David M.
Maksymowych, Walter P.
Lambert, Robert G.
Jaremko, Jacob L.
Chauvin, Nancy A.
author_facet Weiss, Pamela F.
Xiao, Rui
Brandon, Timothy G.
Biko, David M.
Maksymowych, Walter P.
Lambert, Robert G.
Jaremko, Jacob L.
Chauvin, Nancy A.
author_sort Weiss, Pamela F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of pelvic radiographs versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints in children with suspected sacroiliitis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of children with suspected or confirmed spondyloarthritis who underwent pelvic radiograph and MRI within 6 months of one another. Images were scored independently by five raters. Interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss’s kappa coefficient (κ). Test properties of radiographs for depiction of sacroiliitis were calculated using MRI global sacroiliitis impression as the reference standard. RESULTS: The interrater agreement for global impression was κ = 0.34 (95% CI 0.19–0.52) for radiographs and κ = 0.72 (95% CI 0.52–0.86) for MRI. Across raters, the sensitivity of radiographs ranged from 25 to 77.8% and specificity ranged from 60.8 to 92.2%. Positive and negative predictive values ranged from 25.9 to 52% and from 82.7 to 93.9%, respectively. The misclassification rate ranged from 6 to 17% for negative radiographs/positive MRI scans and from 48 to 74% for positive radiographs/negative MRI scans. When the reference standard was changed to structural lesions consistent with sacroiliitis on MRI, the misclassification rate was higher for negative radiographs/positive MRI scans (9–23%) and marginally improved for positive radiographs/negative MRI scans (33–52%). CONCLUSION: Interrater reliability of MRI was superior to radiographs for global sacroiliitis impression. Misclassification for both negative and positive radiographs was high across raters. Radiographs have limited utility in screening for sacroiliitis in children and result in a significant proportion of both false negative and positive findings versus MRI findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60423552018-07-13 Radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value? Weiss, Pamela F. Xiao, Rui Brandon, Timothy G. Biko, David M. Maksymowych, Walter P. Lambert, Robert G. Jaremko, Jacob L. Chauvin, Nancy A. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of pelvic radiographs versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints in children with suspected sacroiliitis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of children with suspected or confirmed spondyloarthritis who underwent pelvic radiograph and MRI within 6 months of one another. Images were scored independently by five raters. Interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss’s kappa coefficient (κ). Test properties of radiographs for depiction of sacroiliitis were calculated using MRI global sacroiliitis impression as the reference standard. RESULTS: The interrater agreement for global impression was κ = 0.34 (95% CI 0.19–0.52) for radiographs and κ = 0.72 (95% CI 0.52–0.86) for MRI. Across raters, the sensitivity of radiographs ranged from 25 to 77.8% and specificity ranged from 60.8 to 92.2%. Positive and negative predictive values ranged from 25.9 to 52% and from 82.7 to 93.9%, respectively. The misclassification rate ranged from 6 to 17% for negative radiographs/positive MRI scans and from 48 to 74% for positive radiographs/negative MRI scans. When the reference standard was changed to structural lesions consistent with sacroiliitis on MRI, the misclassification rate was higher for negative radiographs/positive MRI scans (9–23%) and marginally improved for positive radiographs/negative MRI scans (33–52%). CONCLUSION: Interrater reliability of MRI was superior to radiographs for global sacroiliitis impression. Misclassification for both negative and positive radiographs was high across raters. Radiographs have limited utility in screening for sacroiliitis in children and result in a significant proportion of both false negative and positive findings versus MRI findings. BioMed Central 2018-07-11 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6042355/ /pubmed/29996925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1642-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weiss, Pamela F.
Xiao, Rui
Brandon, Timothy G.
Biko, David M.
Maksymowych, Walter P.
Lambert, Robert G.
Jaremko, Jacob L.
Chauvin, Nancy A.
Radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value?
title Radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value?
title_full Radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value?
title_fullStr Radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value?
title_full_unstemmed Radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value?
title_short Radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value?
title_sort radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1642-8
work_keys_str_mv AT weisspamelaf radiographsinscreeningforsacroiliitisinchildrenwhatisthevalue
AT xiaorui radiographsinscreeningforsacroiliitisinchildrenwhatisthevalue
AT brandontimothyg radiographsinscreeningforsacroiliitisinchildrenwhatisthevalue
AT bikodavidm radiographsinscreeningforsacroiliitisinchildrenwhatisthevalue
AT maksymowychwalterp radiographsinscreeningforsacroiliitisinchildrenwhatisthevalue
AT lambertrobertg radiographsinscreeningforsacroiliitisinchildrenwhatisthevalue
AT jaremkojacobl radiographsinscreeningforsacroiliitisinchildrenwhatisthevalue
AT chauvinnancya radiographsinscreeningforsacroiliitisinchildrenwhatisthevalue