Cargando…

Quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern Switzerland

BACKGROUND: Quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become an important item for providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. Aim of this study is to present the results of some evidence-based quality indicators (QI) for prostate cancer (PC) at the population-based level and to compare the outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortelli, Laura, Spitale, Alessandra, Mazzucchelli, Luca, Bordoni, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4604-2
_version_ 1783339143098531840
author Ortelli, Laura
Spitale, Alessandra
Mazzucchelli, Luca
Bordoni, Andrea
author_facet Ortelli, Laura
Spitale, Alessandra
Mazzucchelli, Luca
Bordoni, Andrea
author_sort Ortelli, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become an important item for providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. Aim of this study is to present the results of some evidence-based quality indicators (QI) for prostate cancer (PC) at the population-based level and to compare the outcomes with data available in the literature. METHODS: The study included all PC diagnosed on a three years period analysis (01.01.2011–31.12.2013) in the population of Canton Ticino (Southern Switzerland) extracted from the Ticino Cancer Registry database. 13 QI, approved through the validated Delphi methodology, were calculated using the “available case” approach: 2 for diagnosis, 4 for pathology, 6 for treatment and 1 for outcome. The selection of the computed QI was based on the availability of medical documentation. QI are presented as proportion (%) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: 700 PC were detected during the three-year period 2011–2013: 78.3% of them were diagnosed through a prostatic biopsy and for 72.5% 8 or more biopsy cores were taken. 46.5% of the low risk PC patients underwent active surveillance, while 69.2% of high risk PC underwent a radical treatment (radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy or brachytherapy) and 73.5% of patients with metastatic PC were treated with hormonal therapy. The overall 30-day postoperative mortality was 0.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Results emerging from this study on the QoCC for PC in Canton Ticino are encouraging: the choice of treatment modalities seems to respect the international guidelines and our results are comparable to the scarce number of available international studies. Additional national and international standardisation of the QI and further QI population-based studies are needed in order to get a real picture of the PC diagnostic-therapeutic process progress through the definition of thresholds of minimal standard of care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4604-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60423902018-07-13 Quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern Switzerland Ortelli, Laura Spitale, Alessandra Mazzucchelli, Luca Bordoni, Andrea BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Quality of cancer care (QoCC) has become an important item for providers, regulators and purchasers of care worldwide. Aim of this study is to present the results of some evidence-based quality indicators (QI) for prostate cancer (PC) at the population-based level and to compare the outcomes with data available in the literature. METHODS: The study included all PC diagnosed on a three years period analysis (01.01.2011–31.12.2013) in the population of Canton Ticino (Southern Switzerland) extracted from the Ticino Cancer Registry database. 13 QI, approved through the validated Delphi methodology, were calculated using the “available case” approach: 2 for diagnosis, 4 for pathology, 6 for treatment and 1 for outcome. The selection of the computed QI was based on the availability of medical documentation. QI are presented as proportion (%) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: 700 PC were detected during the three-year period 2011–2013: 78.3% of them were diagnosed through a prostatic biopsy and for 72.5% 8 or more biopsy cores were taken. 46.5% of the low risk PC patients underwent active surveillance, while 69.2% of high risk PC underwent a radical treatment (radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy or brachytherapy) and 73.5% of patients with metastatic PC were treated with hormonal therapy. The overall 30-day postoperative mortality was 0.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Results emerging from this study on the QoCC for PC in Canton Ticino are encouraging: the choice of treatment modalities seems to respect the international guidelines and our results are comparable to the scarce number of available international studies. Additional national and international standardisation of the QI and further QI population-based studies are needed in order to get a real picture of the PC diagnostic-therapeutic process progress through the definition of thresholds of minimal standard of care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4604-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6042390/ /pubmed/29996904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4604-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ortelli, Laura
Spitale, Alessandra
Mazzucchelli, Luca
Bordoni, Andrea
Quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern Switzerland
title Quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern Switzerland
title_full Quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern Switzerland
title_fullStr Quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern Switzerland
title_short Quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern Switzerland
title_sort quality indicators of clinical cancer care for prostate cancer: a population-based study in southern switzerland
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29996904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4604-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ortellilaura qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareforprostatecancerapopulationbasedstudyinsouthernswitzerland
AT spitalealessandra qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareforprostatecancerapopulationbasedstudyinsouthernswitzerland
AT mazzucchelliluca qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareforprostatecancerapopulationbasedstudyinsouthernswitzerland
AT bordoniandrea qualityindicatorsofclinicalcancercareforprostatecancerapopulationbasedstudyinsouthernswitzerland