Cargando…

Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study

The scent detection prowess of dogs has prompted interest in their ability to detect cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dogs could use olfactory cues to discriminate urine samples collected from dogs that did or did not have urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorman, David C, Foster, Melanie L, Fernhoff, Katherine E, Hess, Paul R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050858
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S148594
_version_ 1783339164237824000
author Dorman, David C
Foster, Melanie L
Fernhoff, Katherine E
Hess, Paul R
author_facet Dorman, David C
Foster, Melanie L
Fernhoff, Katherine E
Hess, Paul R
author_sort Dorman, David C
collection PubMed
description The scent detection prowess of dogs has prompted interest in their ability to detect cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dogs could use olfactory cues to discriminate urine samples collected from dogs that did or did not have urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), at a rate greater than chance. Dogs with previous scent training (n=4) were initially trained to distinguish between a single control and a single TCC-positive urine sample. All dogs acquired this task (mean =15±7.9 sessions; 20 trials/session). The next training phase used four additional control urine samples (n=5) while maintaining the one original TCC-positive urine sample. All dogs quickly acquired this task (mean =5.3±1.5 sessions). The last training phase used multiple control (n=4) and TCC-positive (n=6) urine samples to pro-mote categorical training by the dogs. Only one dog was able to correctly distinguish multiple combinations of TCC-positive and control urine samples suggesting that it mastered categorical learning. The final study phase evaluated whether this dog would generalize this behavior to novel urine samples. However, during double-blind tests using two novel TCC-positive and six novel TCC-negative urine samples, this dog did not indicate canine TCC-positive cancer samples more frequently than expected by chance. Our study illustrates the need to consider canine olfactory memory and the use of double-blind methods to avoid erroneous conclusions regarding the ability of dogs to alert on specimens from canine cancer patients. Our results also suggest that sample storage, confounding odors, and other factors need to be considered in the design of future studies that evaluate the detection of canine cancers by scent detection dogs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60424822018-07-26 Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study Dorman, David C Foster, Melanie L Fernhoff, Katherine E Hess, Paul R Vet Med (Auckl) Original Research The scent detection prowess of dogs has prompted interest in their ability to detect cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dogs could use olfactory cues to discriminate urine samples collected from dogs that did or did not have urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), at a rate greater than chance. Dogs with previous scent training (n=4) were initially trained to distinguish between a single control and a single TCC-positive urine sample. All dogs acquired this task (mean =15±7.9 sessions; 20 trials/session). The next training phase used four additional control urine samples (n=5) while maintaining the one original TCC-positive urine sample. All dogs quickly acquired this task (mean =5.3±1.5 sessions). The last training phase used multiple control (n=4) and TCC-positive (n=6) urine samples to pro-mote categorical training by the dogs. Only one dog was able to correctly distinguish multiple combinations of TCC-positive and control urine samples suggesting that it mastered categorical learning. The final study phase evaluated whether this dog would generalize this behavior to novel urine samples. However, during double-blind tests using two novel TCC-positive and six novel TCC-negative urine samples, this dog did not indicate canine TCC-positive cancer samples more frequently than expected by chance. Our study illustrates the need to consider canine olfactory memory and the use of double-blind methods to avoid erroneous conclusions regarding the ability of dogs to alert on specimens from canine cancer patients. Our results also suggest that sample storage, confounding odors, and other factors need to be considered in the design of future studies that evaluate the detection of canine cancers by scent detection dogs. Dove Medical Press 2017-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6042482/ /pubmed/30050858 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S148594 Text en © 2017 Dorman et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dorman, David C
Foster, Melanie L
Fernhoff, Katherine E
Hess, Paul R
Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study
title Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study
title_full Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study
title_short Canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study
title_sort canine scent detection of canine cancer: a feasibility study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050858
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S148594
work_keys_str_mv AT dormandavidc caninescentdetectionofcaninecancerafeasibilitystudy
AT fostermelaniel caninescentdetectionofcaninecancerafeasibilitystudy
AT fernhoffkatherinee caninescentdetectionofcaninecancerafeasibilitystudy
AT hesspaulr caninescentdetectionofcaninecancerafeasibilitystudy