Cargando…
Integrating culturally informed approaches into physiotherapy assessment and treatment of chronic pain: a pilot randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient engagement with, and the feasibility of, a novel, culturally adapted physiotherapy pain management approach. DESIGN: A participant-blinded and assessor-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient physiotherapy departments at two public hospitals and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021999 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient engagement with, and the feasibility of, a novel, culturally adapted physiotherapy pain management approach. DESIGN: A participant-blinded and assessor-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient physiotherapy departments at two public hospitals and one district pain clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n=48) with chronic musculoskeletal pain (daily pain >3 months), who self-identified as Mandaean, Assyrian or Vietnamese, were randomised to one of two physiotherapy treatment conditions. INTERVENTIONS: 24 participants underwent combined group and individualised treatment described as ‘culturally adapted physiotherapy’, while 24 underwent evidence-informed ‘usual physiotherapy care’. Both treatment arms consisted of up to 10 sessions over a 3-month period. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient engagement was measured via participant attendance, adherence and satisfaction data. Secondary outcomes included clinical measures of pain severity, interference and suffering, physical function and negative emotional state. RESULTS: 96% of participants undergoing culturally adapted physiotherapy completed treatment, compared with 58% of the usual physiotherapy group. For the culturally adapted group attendance (87%±18%) and adherence (68%±32%) were higher relative to usual care (68%±32% and 55%±43%). Satisfaction was similar for the culturally adapted (82.7%±13.4%) and usual care (79.3±17.3) groups. For secondary outcomes, a significant between-group effect for pain-related suffering in favour of the culturally adapted group was observed with a medium effect size (partial η(2) 0.086, mean 3.56, 95% CI 0.11 to 7), while results for pain severity, interference, physical function and negative emotional state were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Aligning treatment with the beliefs and values of culturally and linguistically diverse communities enhances patient engagement with physiotherapy. These results support the feasibility of a larger, multisite trial to determine if improved engagement with culturally adapted physiotherapy translates to improved clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000857404; Pre-results. |
---|