Cargando…

Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To determine, using face-to-face diagnostic interviews, the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) in a cohort of adult Indigenous Australians, the cultural acceptability of the interviews, the rates of comorbid CMD and concordance with psychiatrists’ diagnoses. DESIGN: Cross-section...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasir, Bushra F, Toombs, Maree R, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas, Kisely, Steve, Gill, Neeraj S, Black, Emma, Hayman, Noel, Ranmuthugala, Geetha, Beccaria, Gavin, Ostini, Remo, Nicholson, Geoffrey C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29961007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020196
_version_ 1783339178473291776
author Nasir, Bushra F
Toombs, Maree R
Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas
Kisely, Steve
Gill, Neeraj S
Black, Emma
Hayman, Noel
Ranmuthugala, Geetha
Beccaria, Gavin
Ostini, Remo
Nicholson, Geoffrey C
author_facet Nasir, Bushra F
Toombs, Maree R
Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas
Kisely, Steve
Gill, Neeraj S
Black, Emma
Hayman, Noel
Ranmuthugala, Geetha
Beccaria, Gavin
Ostini, Remo
Nicholson, Geoffrey C
author_sort Nasir, Bushra F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine, using face-to-face diagnostic interviews, the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) in a cohort of adult Indigenous Australians, the cultural acceptability of the interviews, the rates of comorbid CMD and concordance with psychiatrists’ diagnoses. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study July 2014–November 2016. Psychologists conducted Structured Clinical Interviews for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) (n=544). Psychiatrists interviewed a subsample (n=78). SETTING: Four Aboriginal Medical Services and the general community located in urban, regional and remote areas of Southern Queensland and two Aboriginal Reserves located in New South Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Indigenous Australian adults. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cultural acceptability of SCID-I interviews, standardised rates of CMD, comorbid CMD and concordance with psychiatrist diagnoses. RESULTS: Participants reported that the SCID-I interviews were generally culturally acceptable. Standardised rates (95% CI) of current mood, anxiety, substance use and any mental disorder were 16.2% (12.2% to 20.2%), 29.2% (24.2% to 34.1%), 12.4% (8.8% to 16.1%) and 42.2% (38.8% to 47.7%), respectively—6.7-fold, 3.8-fold, 6.9-fold and 4.2-fold higher, respectively, than those of the Australian population. Differences between this Indigenous cohort and the Australian population were less marked for 12-month (2.4-fold) and lifetime prevalence (1.3-fold). Comorbid mental disorder was threefold to fourfold higher. In subgroups living on traditional lands in Indigenous reserves and in remote areas, the rate was half that of those living in mainstream communities. Moderate-to-good concordance with psychiatrist diagnoses was found. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of current CMD in this Indigenous population is substantially higher than previous estimates. The lower relative rates of non-current disorders are consistent with underdiagnosis of previous events. The lower rates among Reserve and remote area residents point to the importance of Indigenous peoples’ connection to their traditional lands and culture, and a potentially important protective factor. A larger study with random sampling is required to determine the population prevalence of CMD in Indigenous Australians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60425572018-07-16 Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional study Nasir, Bushra F Toombs, Maree R Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas Kisely, Steve Gill, Neeraj S Black, Emma Hayman, Noel Ranmuthugala, Geetha Beccaria, Gavin Ostini, Remo Nicholson, Geoffrey C BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: To determine, using face-to-face diagnostic interviews, the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) in a cohort of adult Indigenous Australians, the cultural acceptability of the interviews, the rates of comorbid CMD and concordance with psychiatrists’ diagnoses. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study July 2014–November 2016. Psychologists conducted Structured Clinical Interviews for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) (n=544). Psychiatrists interviewed a subsample (n=78). SETTING: Four Aboriginal Medical Services and the general community located in urban, regional and remote areas of Southern Queensland and two Aboriginal Reserves located in New South Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Indigenous Australian adults. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cultural acceptability of SCID-I interviews, standardised rates of CMD, comorbid CMD and concordance with psychiatrist diagnoses. RESULTS: Participants reported that the SCID-I interviews were generally culturally acceptable. Standardised rates (95% CI) of current mood, anxiety, substance use and any mental disorder were 16.2% (12.2% to 20.2%), 29.2% (24.2% to 34.1%), 12.4% (8.8% to 16.1%) and 42.2% (38.8% to 47.7%), respectively—6.7-fold, 3.8-fold, 6.9-fold and 4.2-fold higher, respectively, than those of the Australian population. Differences between this Indigenous cohort and the Australian population were less marked for 12-month (2.4-fold) and lifetime prevalence (1.3-fold). Comorbid mental disorder was threefold to fourfold higher. In subgroups living on traditional lands in Indigenous reserves and in remote areas, the rate was half that of those living in mainstream communities. Moderate-to-good concordance with psychiatrist diagnoses was found. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of current CMD in this Indigenous population is substantially higher than previous estimates. The lower relative rates of non-current disorders are consistent with underdiagnosis of previous events. The lower rates among Reserve and remote area residents point to the importance of Indigenous peoples’ connection to their traditional lands and culture, and a potentially important protective factor. A larger study with random sampling is required to determine the population prevalence of CMD in Indigenous Australians. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6042557/ /pubmed/29961007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020196 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Nasir, Bushra F
Toombs, Maree R
Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas
Kisely, Steve
Gill, Neeraj S
Black, Emma
Hayman, Noel
Ranmuthugala, Geetha
Beccaria, Gavin
Ostini, Remo
Nicholson, Geoffrey C
Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional study
title Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional study
title_full Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional study
title_short Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional study
title_sort common mental disorders among indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan australia: a cross-sectional study
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29961007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020196
work_keys_str_mv AT nasirbushraf commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT toombsmareer commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT kondalsamychennakesavansrinivas commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT kiselysteve commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT gillneerajs commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT blackemma commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT haymannoel commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT ranmuthugalageetha commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT beccariagavin commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT ostiniremo commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy
AT nicholsongeoffreyc commonmentaldisordersamongindigenouspeoplelivinginregionalremoteandmetropolitanaustraliaacrosssectionalstudy