Cargando…

Initial use of supplementary oxygen for trauma patients: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the evidence for supplementary oxygen for spontaneously breathing trauma patients, and for high (0.60–0.90) versus low (0.30–0.50) inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO(2)) for intubated trauma patients in the initial phase of treatment. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskesen, Trine Grodum, Baekgaard, Josefine Stokholm, Steinmetz, Jacob, Rasmussen, Lars S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29982208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020880
_version_ 1783339186427789312
author Eskesen, Trine Grodum
Baekgaard, Josefine Stokholm
Steinmetz, Jacob
Rasmussen, Lars S
author_facet Eskesen, Trine Grodum
Baekgaard, Josefine Stokholm
Steinmetz, Jacob
Rasmussen, Lars S
author_sort Eskesen, Trine Grodum
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the evidence for supplementary oxygen for spontaneously breathing trauma patients, and for high (0.60–0.90) versus low (0.30–0.50) inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO(2)) for intubated trauma patients in the initial phase of treatment. METHODS: Several databases were systematically searched in September 2017 for studies fulfilling the following criteria: trauma patients (Population); supplementary oxygen/high FiO(2) (Intervention) versus no supplementary oxygen/low FiO(2) (Control) for spontaneously breathing or intubated trauma patients, respectively, in the initial phase of treatment; mortality, complications, days on mechanical ventilation and/or length of stay (LOS) in hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) (Outcomes); prospective interventional trials (Study design). Two independent reviewers screened and identified studies and extracted data from included studies. RESULTS: 6142 citations were screened with an inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa) of 0.88. One interventional trial of intubated trauma patients was included. 68 trauma patients were randomised to receive an FiO(2) of 0.80 (intervention group) or 0.50 (control group) during mechanical ventilation (first 6 hours). There was no significant difference in hospital or ICU LOS between the groups. No patient died in either group. Another interventional trial, not strictly fulfilling the inclusion criteria, was presented for descriptive purposes. 21 trauma patients were alternately assigned to two types of mechanical ventilation (first 48 hours), both aiming at an FiO(2) of 0.40, but resulted in estimated mean FiO(2)s of 0.45 (intervention group) and 0.60 (control group). No difference in days on mechanical ventilation was found. Two patients in the control group died, none in the intervention group. No prospective, interventional trials on spontaneously breathing trauma patients were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the use of supplementary oxygen for spontaneously breathing trauma patients is lacking, and the evidence for low versus high FiO(2) for intubated trauma patients is limited. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 42016050552
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60425912018-07-16 Initial use of supplementary oxygen for trauma patients: a systematic review Eskesen, Trine Grodum Baekgaard, Josefine Stokholm Steinmetz, Jacob Rasmussen, Lars S BMJ Open Anaesthesia OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to identify and describe the evidence for supplementary oxygen for spontaneously breathing trauma patients, and for high (0.60–0.90) versus low (0.30–0.50) inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO(2)) for intubated trauma patients in the initial phase of treatment. METHODS: Several databases were systematically searched in September 2017 for studies fulfilling the following criteria: trauma patients (Population); supplementary oxygen/high FiO(2) (Intervention) versus no supplementary oxygen/low FiO(2) (Control) for spontaneously breathing or intubated trauma patients, respectively, in the initial phase of treatment; mortality, complications, days on mechanical ventilation and/or length of stay (LOS) in hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) (Outcomes); prospective interventional trials (Study design). Two independent reviewers screened and identified studies and extracted data from included studies. RESULTS: 6142 citations were screened with an inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa) of 0.88. One interventional trial of intubated trauma patients was included. 68 trauma patients were randomised to receive an FiO(2) of 0.80 (intervention group) or 0.50 (control group) during mechanical ventilation (first 6 hours). There was no significant difference in hospital or ICU LOS between the groups. No patient died in either group. Another interventional trial, not strictly fulfilling the inclusion criteria, was presented for descriptive purposes. 21 trauma patients were alternately assigned to two types of mechanical ventilation (first 48 hours), both aiming at an FiO(2) of 0.40, but resulted in estimated mean FiO(2)s of 0.45 (intervention group) and 0.60 (control group). No difference in days on mechanical ventilation was found. Two patients in the control group died, none in the intervention group. No prospective, interventional trials on spontaneously breathing trauma patients were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the use of supplementary oxygen for spontaneously breathing trauma patients is lacking, and the evidence for low versus high FiO(2) for intubated trauma patients is limited. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 42016050552 BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6042591/ /pubmed/29982208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020880 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Eskesen, Trine Grodum
Baekgaard, Josefine Stokholm
Steinmetz, Jacob
Rasmussen, Lars S
Initial use of supplementary oxygen for trauma patients: a systematic review
title Initial use of supplementary oxygen for trauma patients: a systematic review
title_full Initial use of supplementary oxygen for trauma patients: a systematic review
title_fullStr Initial use of supplementary oxygen for trauma patients: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Initial use of supplementary oxygen for trauma patients: a systematic review
title_short Initial use of supplementary oxygen for trauma patients: a systematic review
title_sort initial use of supplementary oxygen for trauma patients: a systematic review
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29982208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020880
work_keys_str_mv AT eskesentrinegrodum initialuseofsupplementaryoxygenfortraumapatientsasystematicreview
AT baekgaardjosefinestokholm initialuseofsupplementaryoxygenfortraumapatientsasystematicreview
AT steinmetzjacob initialuseofsupplementaryoxygenfortraumapatientsasystematicreview
AT rasmussenlarss initialuseofsupplementaryoxygenfortraumapatientsasystematicreview