Cargando…

Accuracy of colorectal cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

Objectives To assess the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision – Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes in identifying subjects with colorectal cancer. DESIGN: A diagnostic accuracy study comparing ICD-9-CM codes (index test) for colorectal cancers with medical chart (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cozzolino, Francesco, Bidoli, Ettore, Abraha, Iosief, Fusco, Mario, Giovannini, Gianni, Casucci, Paola, Orso, Massimiliano, Granata, Annalisa, De Giorgi, Marcello, Collarile, Paolo, Ciullo, Valerio, Vitale, Maria Francesca, Cirocchi, Roberto, Orlandi, Walter, Serraino, Diego, Montedori, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020630
_version_ 1783339190624190464
author Cozzolino, Francesco
Bidoli, Ettore
Abraha, Iosief
Fusco, Mario
Giovannini, Gianni
Casucci, Paola
Orso, Massimiliano
Granata, Annalisa
De Giorgi, Marcello
Collarile, Paolo
Ciullo, Valerio
Vitale, Maria Francesca
Cirocchi, Roberto
Orlandi, Walter
Serraino, Diego
Montedori, Alessandro
author_facet Cozzolino, Francesco
Bidoli, Ettore
Abraha, Iosief
Fusco, Mario
Giovannini, Gianni
Casucci, Paola
Orso, Massimiliano
Granata, Annalisa
De Giorgi, Marcello
Collarile, Paolo
Ciullo, Valerio
Vitale, Maria Francesca
Cirocchi, Roberto
Orlandi, Walter
Serraino, Diego
Montedori, Alessandro
author_sort Cozzolino, Francesco
collection PubMed
description Objectives To assess the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision – Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes in identifying subjects with colorectal cancer. DESIGN: A diagnostic accuracy study comparing ICD-9-CM codes (index test) for colorectal cancers with medical chart (as a reference standard). Case ascertainment based on neoplastic lesion(s) within the colon/rectum and histological documentation from a primary or metastatic site positive for colorectal cancer. SETTING: Administrative databases from the Umbria region, Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) Napoli 3 Sud (NA) region and Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG) region. PARTICIPANTS: We randomly selected 130 incident patients from each hospital discharge database, admitted between 2012 and 2014, having colorectal cancer ICD-9 codes located in primary position, and 94 non-cases, that is, patients having a diagnosis of cancer (ICD-9 140–239) other than colorectal cancer in primary position. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for 153.x code (colon cancer) and for 154.x code (rectal cancer). RESULTS: The positive predictive value (PPV) for colon cancer diagnoses was 80% for Umbria (95% CI 73% to 87%), 81% for NA (95% CI 73% to 88%) and 80% for FVG (95% CI 72% to 87%). The sensitivity ranged from 98% to 99%, while the specificity ranged from 78% to 80% in the three units. For rectal cancer, the PPV was 84% for Umbria (95% CI 77% to 90%), 80% for NA (95% CI 72% to 87%) and 81% for FVG (95% CI 73% to 87%). The sensitivities ranged from 98% to 100%, while the specificity estimates from 79% to 82%. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative databases in Italy can be a valuable tool for cancer surveillance as well as monitoring geographical and temporal variation of cancer practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60426112018-07-16 Accuracy of colorectal cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study Cozzolino, Francesco Bidoli, Ettore Abraha, Iosief Fusco, Mario Giovannini, Gianni Casucci, Paola Orso, Massimiliano Granata, Annalisa De Giorgi, Marcello Collarile, Paolo Ciullo, Valerio Vitale, Maria Francesca Cirocchi, Roberto Orlandi, Walter Serraino, Diego Montedori, Alessandro BMJ Open Oncology Objectives To assess the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision – Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes in identifying subjects with colorectal cancer. DESIGN: A diagnostic accuracy study comparing ICD-9-CM codes (index test) for colorectal cancers with medical chart (as a reference standard). Case ascertainment based on neoplastic lesion(s) within the colon/rectum and histological documentation from a primary or metastatic site positive for colorectal cancer. SETTING: Administrative databases from the Umbria region, Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) Napoli 3 Sud (NA) region and Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG) region. PARTICIPANTS: We randomly selected 130 incident patients from each hospital discharge database, admitted between 2012 and 2014, having colorectal cancer ICD-9 codes located in primary position, and 94 non-cases, that is, patients having a diagnosis of cancer (ICD-9 140–239) other than colorectal cancer in primary position. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for 153.x code (colon cancer) and for 154.x code (rectal cancer). RESULTS: The positive predictive value (PPV) for colon cancer diagnoses was 80% for Umbria (95% CI 73% to 87%), 81% for NA (95% CI 73% to 88%) and 80% for FVG (95% CI 72% to 87%). The sensitivity ranged from 98% to 99%, while the specificity ranged from 78% to 80% in the three units. For rectal cancer, the PPV was 84% for Umbria (95% CI 77% to 90%), 80% for NA (95% CI 72% to 87%) and 81% for FVG (95% CI 73% to 87%). The sensitivities ranged from 98% to 100%, while the specificity estimates from 79% to 82%. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative databases in Italy can be a valuable tool for cancer surveillance as well as monitoring geographical and temporal variation of cancer practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6042611/ /pubmed/29980543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020630 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Cozzolino, Francesco
Bidoli, Ettore
Abraha, Iosief
Fusco, Mario
Giovannini, Gianni
Casucci, Paola
Orso, Massimiliano
Granata, Annalisa
De Giorgi, Marcello
Collarile, Paolo
Ciullo, Valerio
Vitale, Maria Francesca
Cirocchi, Roberto
Orlandi, Walter
Serraino, Diego
Montedori, Alessandro
Accuracy of colorectal cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
title Accuracy of colorectal cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_full Accuracy of colorectal cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_fullStr Accuracy of colorectal cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of colorectal cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_short Accuracy of colorectal cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_sort accuracy of colorectal cancer icd-9-cm codes in italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020630
work_keys_str_mv AT cozzolinofrancesco accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT bidoliettore accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT abrahaiosief accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT fuscomario accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT giovanninigianni accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT casuccipaola accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT orsomassimiliano accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT granataannalisa accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT degiorgimarcello accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT collarilepaolo accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT ciullovalerio accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT vitalemariafrancesca accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT cirocchiroberto accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT orlandiwalter accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT serrainodiego accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT montedorialessandro accuracyofcolorectalcancericd9cmcodesinitalianadministrativehealthcaredatabasesacrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy