Cargando…
The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective
BACKGROUND: The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199186 |
_version_ | 1783339199100878848 |
---|---|
author | Amparo, Anna Charinna B. Jayme, Sarah I. Roces, Maria Concepcion R. Quizon, Maria Consorcia L. Villalon, Ernesto E. S. Quiambao, Beatriz P. Baquilod, Mario S. Hernandez, Leda M. Taylor, Louise H. Nel, Louis H. |
author_facet | Amparo, Anna Charinna B. Jayme, Sarah I. Roces, Maria Concepcion R. Quizon, Maria Consorcia L. Villalon, Ernesto E. S. Quiambao, Beatriz P. Baquilod, Mario S. Hernandez, Leda M. Taylor, Louise H. Nel, Louis H. |
author_sort | Amparo, Anna Charinna B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant interviews and surveys in sample ABTCs to determine the cost-effectiveness of this network in preventing human rabies deaths. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: One urban and one rural ABTC in each of three selected provinces were studied in more detail. PEP delivery generally followed national guidance based on best practices, but there was evidence of operational challenges in supplying all ABTCs with adequate biologics and recently trained staff. Funding was contributed by different levels of government and in some clinics, patients paid for a significant fraction of the total cost. From a health provider perspective including both fixed and variable costs, the average PEP course delivered cost USD 32.91 /patient across urban ABTCs (with higher patient throughput) and USD 57.21 /patient across rural ABTCs. These costs suggests that PEP provision in the Philippines cost USD 37.6 million in 2016, with a cost per life saved of USD 8,290. An analysis of the 2,239 suspected rabies deaths from 2008 to 2016 showed no significant decline, and from 2014–16 an average of 8,534 years of life were lost annually. The incidence of rabies deaths from 2014–16 was not clearly related to the provision of ABTCs (per 100,000 population) or human population density, but deaths were more common in higher income provinces. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In the context of comprehensive rabies control (including dog vaccination and public awareness) ways to reduce this high expenditure on PEP should be explored, to most cost-effectively reach the elimination of human rabies deaths. This paper is accompanied by another containing data on the operation of ABTCs network from a patient perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6042697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60426972018-07-19 The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective Amparo, Anna Charinna B. Jayme, Sarah I. Roces, Maria Concepcion R. Quizon, Maria Consorcia L. Villalon, Ernesto E. S. Quiambao, Beatriz P. Baquilod, Mario S. Hernandez, Leda M. Taylor, Louise H. Nel, Louis H. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant interviews and surveys in sample ABTCs to determine the cost-effectiveness of this network in preventing human rabies deaths. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: One urban and one rural ABTC in each of three selected provinces were studied in more detail. PEP delivery generally followed national guidance based on best practices, but there was evidence of operational challenges in supplying all ABTCs with adequate biologics and recently trained staff. Funding was contributed by different levels of government and in some clinics, patients paid for a significant fraction of the total cost. From a health provider perspective including both fixed and variable costs, the average PEP course delivered cost USD 32.91 /patient across urban ABTCs (with higher patient throughput) and USD 57.21 /patient across rural ABTCs. These costs suggests that PEP provision in the Philippines cost USD 37.6 million in 2016, with a cost per life saved of USD 8,290. An analysis of the 2,239 suspected rabies deaths from 2008 to 2016 showed no significant decline, and from 2014–16 an average of 8,534 years of life were lost annually. The incidence of rabies deaths from 2014–16 was not clearly related to the provision of ABTCs (per 100,000 population) or human population density, but deaths were more common in higher income provinces. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In the context of comprehensive rabies control (including dog vaccination and public awareness) ways to reduce this high expenditure on PEP should be explored, to most cost-effectively reach the elimination of human rabies deaths. This paper is accompanied by another containing data on the operation of ABTCs network from a patient perspective. Public Library of Science 2018-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6042697/ /pubmed/30001378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199186 Text en © 2018 Amparo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Amparo, Anna Charinna B. Jayme, Sarah I. Roces, Maria Concepcion R. Quizon, Maria Consorcia L. Villalon, Ernesto E. S. Quiambao, Beatriz P. Baquilod, Mario S. Hernandez, Leda M. Taylor, Louise H. Nel, Louis H. The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective |
title | The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective |
title_full | The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective |
title_short | The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective |
title_sort | evaluation of operating animal bite treatment centers in the philippines from a health provider perspective |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amparoannacharinnab theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT jaymesarahi theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT rocesmariaconcepcionr theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT quizonmariaconsorcial theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT villalonernestoes theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT quiambaobeatrizp theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT baquilodmarios theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT hernandezledam theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT taylorlouiseh theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT nellouish theevaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT amparoannacharinnab evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT jaymesarahi evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT rocesmariaconcepcionr evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT quizonmariaconsorcial evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT villalonernestoes evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT quiambaobeatrizp evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT baquilodmarios evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT hernandezledam evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT taylorlouiseh evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective AT nellouish evaluationofoperatinganimalbitetreatmentcentersinthephilippinesfromahealthproviderperspective |